Literature DB >> 29889288

Factors Associated With Residual Astigmatism After Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation Reported in an Online Toric Intraocular Lens Back-calculator.

Richard Potvin, Brent A Kramer, David R Hardten, John P Berdahl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate factors associated with residual astigmatism after toric intraocular lens implantation based on data from an online toric intraocular lens (IOL) back-calculator.
METHODS: This was a retrospective data review of an online toric IOL back-calculator, which allows users to input preoperative toric planning information and postoperative lens orientation and refractive results. These data were used to determine the optimal orientation of the IOL to minimize residual refractive astigmatism. Aggregate data were extracted from this calculator to investigate factors associated with relative magnitudes of residual astigmatic refractive error after implantation of toric IOLs.
RESULTS: A total of 3,159 validated records with an average reported postoperative refractive astigmatism of 1.85 diopters (D) were analyzed; 566 included data allowing calculation of surgically induced astigmatism. The relative magnitude of reported residual astigmatism appeared similar whether a femtosecond laser system was used or not. Significant differences relative to the use of intraoperative aberrometry were observed, as were differences by toric calculator. Higher measured surgically induced astigmatism was most associated with higher levels of reported residual astigmatism. A significant potential decrease in the mean refractive astigmatism was expected with IOL reorientation; in 1,416 cases (44.8%), the expected residual refractive astigmatism after lens reorientation was less than 0.50 D, with a mean reduction of 56% ± 31%.
CONCLUSIONS: When present after cataract surgery, higher levels of residual refractive astigmatism were most associated with large differences in measured preoperative to postoperative keratometry. To a lesser degree, intraoperative aberrometry was associated with lower levels. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(6):366-371.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29889288     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20180327-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  5 in total

1.  Association between axial length and toric intraocular lens rotation according to an online toric back-calculator.

Authors:  Jennifer L Patnaik; Malik Y Kahook; John P Berdahl; David R Hardten; Brandie D Wagner; Leonard K Seibold; Brent A Kramer
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparing Visual Acuity, Low Contrast Acuity and Refractive Error After Implantation of a Low Cylinder Power Toric Intraocular Lens or a Non-Toric Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Kjell Gunnar Gundersen; Richard Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-30

3.  Rotation Characteristics of Three Toric Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Brent A Kramer; David R Hardten; John P Berdahl
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-16

4.  Accuracy of OCT-derived net corneal astigmatism measurement.

Authors:  Clara Llorens-Quintana; Elias Pavlatos; Omkar Thaware; Seema Gupta; Daniel Gradin; Denzil Romfh; Yan Li; David Huang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  [Monte Carlo simulation of biometric effect sizes and their influence on the translational ratio of corneal astigmatism in the cylinders of toric intraocular lenses].

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Jens Schrecker; Michael Schwemm; Timo Eppig; S Schröder; Nóra Szentmáry
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.059

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.