Jeremy D Hill1,2, Viviana Zuluaga-Ramirez1, Sachin Gajghate1, Malika Winfield1, Yuri Persidsky1,2. 1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Center for Substance Abuse Research, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The cannabinoid system exerts functional regulation of neural stem cell (NSC) proliferation and adult neurogenesis, yet not all effects of cannabinoid-like compounds seen can be attributed to the cannabinoid 1 (CB1 ) or CB2 receptor. The recently de-orphaned GPR55 has been shown to be activated by numerous cannabinoid ligands suggesting that GPR55 is a third cannabinoid receptor. Here, we examined the role of GPR55 activation in NSC proliferation and early adult neurogenesis. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of GPR55 agonists (LPI, O-1602, ML184) on human (h) NSC proliferation in vitro were assessed by flow cytometry. Human NSC differentiation was determined by flow cytometry, qPCR and immunohistochemistry. Immature neuron formation in the hippocampus of C57BL/6 and GPR55-/- mice was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. KEY RESULTS: Activation of GPR55 significantly increased proliferation rates of hNSCs in vitro. These effects were attenuated by ML193, a selective GPR55 antagonist. ML184 significantly promoted neuronal differentiation in vitro while ML193 reduced differentiation rates as compared to vehicle treatment. Continuous administration of O-1602 into the hippocampus via a cannula connected to an osmotic pump resulted in increased Ki67+ cells within the dentate gyrus. O-1602 increased immature neuron generation, as assessed by DCX+ and BrdU+ cells, as compared to vehicle-treated animals. GPR55-/- animals displayed reduced rates of proliferation and neurogenesis within the hippocampus while O-1602 had no effect as compared to vehicle controls. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Together, these findings suggest GPR55 activation as a novel target and strategy to regulate NSC proliferation and adult neurogenesis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The cannabinoid system exerts functional regulation of neural stem cell (NSC) proliferation and adult neurogenesis, yet not all effects of cannabinoid-like compounds seen can be attributed to the cannabinoid 1 (CB1 ) or CB2 receptor. The recently de-orphaned GPR55 has been shown to be activated by numerous cannabinoid ligands suggesting that GPR55 is a third cannabinoid receptor. Here, we examined the role of GPR55 activation in NSC proliferation and early adult neurogenesis. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of GPR55 agonists (LPI, O-1602, ML184) on human (h) NSC proliferation in vitro were assessed by flow cytometry. Human NSC differentiation was determined by flow cytometry, qPCR and immunohistochemistry. Immature neuron formation in the hippocampus of C57BL/6 and GPR55-/- mice was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. KEY RESULTS: Activation of GPR55 significantly increased proliferation rates of hNSCs in vitro. These effects were attenuated by ML193, a selective GPR55 antagonist. ML184 significantly promoted neuronal differentiation in vitro while ML193 reduced differentiation rates as compared to vehicle treatment. Continuous administration of O-1602 into the hippocampus via a cannula connected to an osmotic pump resulted in increased Ki67+ cells within the dentate gyrus. O-1602 increased immature neuron generation, as assessed by DCX+ and BrdU+ cells, as compared to vehicle-treated animals. GPR55-/- animals displayed reduced rates of proliferation and neurogenesis within the hippocampus while O-1602 had no effect as compared to vehicle controls. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Together, these findings suggest GPR55 activation as a novel target and strategy to regulate NSC proliferation and adult neurogenesis.
Authors: N A Balenga; E Martínez-Pinilla; J Kargl; R Schröder; M Peinhaupt; W Platzer; Z Bálint; M Zamarbide; I G Dopeso-Reyes; A Ricobaraza; J M Pérez-Ortiz; E Kostenis; M Waldhoer; A Heinemann; R Franco Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Andrew J Brown; Dion A Daniels; Mumta Kassim; Sue Brown; Carl P Haslam; Victoria R Terrell; Jason Brown; Paula L Nichols; Penny C Staton; Alan Wise; Simon J Dowell Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Francisco Molina-Holgado; Ana Rubio-Araiz; Daniel García-Ovejero; Robert J Williams; Jonathan D Moore; Angel Arévalo-Martín; Oscar Gómez-Torres; Eduardo Molina-Holgado Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Kunlin Jin; Lin Xie; Sun Hee Kim; Sophie Parmentier-Batteur; Yunjuan Sun; Xiao Ou Mao; Jocelyn Childs; David A Greenberg Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Claudia Compagnucci; Sara Di Siena; Maria Blaire Bustamante; Daniele Di Giacomo; Monia Di Tommaso; Mauro Maccarrone; Paola Grimaldi; Claudio Sette Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: P Efstathopoulos; A Kourgiantaki; K Karali; K Sidiropoulou; A N Margioris; A Gravanis; I Charalampopoulos Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Luciana M Leo; Boluwatife Familusi; Michelle Hoang; Raymond Smith; Kristen Lindenau; Kevin T Sporici; Eugen Brailoiu; Mary E Abood; G Cristina Brailoiu Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Eva Martínez-Pinilla; David Aguinaga; Gemma Navarro; Alberto J Rico; Julen Oyarzábal; Juan A Sánchez-Arias; José Luis Lanciego; Rafael Franco Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Adam Stasiulewicz; Katarzyna Znajdek; Monika Grudzień; Tomasz Pawiński; And Joanna I Sulkowska Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Dina Medina-Vera; Cristina Rosell-Valle; Antonio J López-Gambero; Juan A Navarro; Emma N Zambrana-Infantes; Patricia Rivera; Luis J Santín; Juan Suarez; Fernando Rodríguez de Fonseca Journal: Biology (Basel) Date: 2020-11-05