| Literature DB >> 29888150 |
Adam Garber1, Purnima M Rao2, Chandrew Rajakumar3, George A Dumitrascu2, Genevieve Rousseau1, Glenn D Posner4.
Abstract
This case is one of an eight-case multidisciplinary curriculum designed and implemented at the University of Ottawa by simulation educators with specialty training in obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) and anesthesiology. Consultation with a nurse educator maintained the quality and relevance of objectives for nursing participants. The curriculum was prepared to train OB/GYN and anesthesiology residents and labor and delivery nurses to hone crisis resource management skills and to recognize and manage rare/critical medical events in an obstetrical setting. Obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and nurses often work together in acute, high-stakes situations and this curriculum provides a safe environment to practice team-based management of such emergencies. Over an eight-year period, this curriculum has been executed in scenario couplets in a four-year cycle to allow OB/GYN and anesthesiology residents exposure to all scenarios during a five-year residency, beginning in their second year. Prospective evaluative data has been positive. For example, over 90% of participants rated these simulations to be 5 out of 5 for "Was an effective use of my educational time" and "Will influence/enhance my future practice." In this scenario, participants must evaluate and treat a postpartum preeclamptic woman who is being treated with magnesium sulfate for the purpose of seizure prophylaxis. The patient experiences magnesium sulfate toxicity and subsequent respiratory arrest. Any mannequin that can display vital signs can be used for this scenario. This simulation case includes a case template, critical actions checklist, debriefing guide, summary of key medical content, and an evaluation form for learners to provide feedback.Entities:
Keywords: adverse drug reactions; anesthesiology; crisis resource management; nursing; obstetrics and gynecology; postgraduate medical education; preeclampsia; simulation scenario
Year: 2018 PMID: 29888150 PMCID: PMC5991930 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
OB/GYN Anesthesiology Nursing Simulation Curriculum
MgSO4: magnesium sulfate; OB/GYN: obstetrics/gynecology
| YEAR | TOPIC 1 | TOPIC 2 |
| 1 | Autonomic Dysreflexia | Twin Breech Delivery |
| 2 | MgSO4 Toxicity | Difficult Airway, Emergent Delivery |
| 3 | Thyroid Storm | Amniotic Fluid Embolism |
| 4 | Cord Prolapse with Abnormal Fetal Heart Rate | Postpartum Hemorrhage |
Initial Parameters
BPM: beats per minute; HPI: history of present illness; PO: per os; Q8H: every eight hours; HEENT: head, eyes, ears, nose, throat; GU: genitourinary
| Initial Presentation | |||
| Initial vital signs | Blood Pressure 110/70; Heart Rate 88 BPM; Respiratory Rate: Seven breaths per minute; SaO2 89%; Temperature: 36.5 degrees Celsius | ||
| Overall appearance | The patient (mannequin) is lying flat on her back. Blood pressure monitor, saturation probe, and Foley catheter have been applied and the monitor is next to the patient. An intravenous (IV) bag labeled magnesium sulfate is infusing for the purpose of seizure prophylaxis. The patient’s partner/supporter is by her side, looking anxious. The patient is minimally responsive. | ||
| Actors and roles in the room at case start | Patient – high fidelity mannequin - voiced by simulation actor who is watching the simulation from the control room. Partner/supporter – confederate actor – can be played by any willing member, including a junior resident or nurse. | ||
| HPI | The nurse is privately pre-briefed prior to scenario start (see Learner Preparation). The patient’s partner/supporter will state that he/she has found the patient less responsive. When asked, the patient’s husband/sister will state that the patient is 32 year' old, delivered vaginally 10 hours ago, it was her second pregnancy, and she is otherwise healthy except for the preeclampsia for which the patient had her labor induced. | ||
| Past Medical/Surgical History | Medications | Allergies | Family History |
| Preeclampsia in this pregnancy. Oral labetalol started one week ago for hypertension. | Prenatal vitamins, Labetalol 200 mg PO Q8H | None | None |
| Physical Examination | |||
| General | Patient is very drowsy and minimally responsive with vague groans | ||
| HEENT | Normal | ||
| Neck | Normal | ||
| Lungs | Decreased breath sounds due to minimal effort | ||
| Cardiovascular | Normal | ||
| Abdomen | Postpartum | ||
| Neurological | Absent deep tendon reflexes – MAY NEED PROMPTING for this | ||
| Skin | Normal | ||
| GU | Foley to urometer with minimal concentrated urine in bag | ||
| Psychiatric | Minimally responsive | ||
Flow of the Scenario
bpm: beats per minute; MgSO4: magnesium sulfate; OB/GYN: obstetrician/gynecologist.
| Instructor Notes – Changes and Case Branch Points | ||
| Intervention/Time point | Change in Case | Additional Information |
| 0-5 Minutes – initial assessment by nurse, calling for help, and handover | Obstetrical nurse in to assess patient | Patient’s partner/supporter states: “She won’t wake up!” Patient groaning |
| If the nurse does not call the OB/GYN or anesthesiologist | The confederate partner/supporter will say “Please get help for her” | |
| 5-10 Minutes – assessment by OB/GYN resident and attending, diagnosis, and initial management | Patient groaning; Possible MgSO4 discontinuation; Possible calcium gluconate given | |
| 7-10 Minutes – patient becomes apneic | Resp. rate decreases to zero; Oxygen Saturation decreases to 80% over two minutes; Blood pressure decreases to 90/60; Heart Rate increases to 110 bpm. | Patient stops groaning |
| 8 minutes | Phone call from the lab providing critical results of elevated creatinine and elevated magnesium on blood work that was drawn following delivery one hour prior to the patient’s deterioration. | |
| If the team does not recognize the respiratory arrest by the time the saturation reaches 80% | The confederate family member will say “Her lips are blue. Is she okay? What’s happening?” | |
| If the patient is bag-mask ventilated or intubated and ventilated | Saturation improves over one minute to 96% | |
| If phenylephrine is given | Blood pressure will increase to 100/68 Heart rate will decrease to 98 bpm | |
| If ephedrine is given | Blood pressure will increase to 100/68 Heart rate will increase to 115 bpm | |
| 10-15 Minutes – ongoing ventilatory, hemodynamic, and specific management | Possible intubation; Possible MgSO4 discontinuation; Possible calcium gluconate given | |
| If the team calls to request more help (ICU, respiratory therapist, anesthesia assistant, second anesthesiologist) | They will be told that help will not be available for 10 minutes | |
| 15 Minutes | Team discussion about post-event monitoring; Counseling patient’s supporter | Scenario ends |
Common Errors and Debriefing Strategies
SBAR: Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation.
| Error Type | Common Errors Observed | Solutions (Teaching Points) |
| Technical Skills (Medical Knowledge, Clinical Skills) | Does not recognize or late to recognize respiratory depression/arrest | Allow learner to explore and reflect on possible reasons for delay and the potential impact of delay. Opportunity for advocacy inquiry technique. |
| Does not recognize or late to recognize magnesium sulfate overdose | Directive feedback or group collaborative effort to develop a differential diagnosis for postpartum decreased level of consciousness. | |
| Does not discontinue magnesium sulfate infusion and/or does not provide IV calcium gluconate | Allow learners to reflect on possible reasons for not stopping magnesium sulfate. directive feedback regarding purpose, dose, and route of calcium gluconate administration. | |
| Non-Technical Skills (Crisis Resource Management) | Situational awareness error – eg. manages the scenario in the dark without the room lights on. | Allow learners to reflect on strategies to maintain situational awareness. |
| Resource allocation error – eg. manages the medical crisis without attending to the patient’s partner/supporter | Allow learners to reflect on the optimal way to allocate human resources. | |
| Communication error – eg. newly entering team members not aware of the suspicion of magnesium sulfate toxicity | Use of video playback to discuss communication techniques used or not used. Description of handover tools, such as SBAR. Discuss sharing one’s mental model or cognitive frame with specific examples. | |
| Fixation error – eg. team does not consider alternate causes of the decreased level of consciousness | Discuss strategies to avoid fixation error. |
Evaluation Data (n = 26 Participants)
CanMEDS: Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists
| 1 (strongly disagree) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 (strongly agree) | |
| The objectives were made clear | 2 | 3 | 21 | ||
| The scenarios were relevant to my practice | 2 | 4 | 20 | ||
| The simulation team behaved in an appropriate and believable manner during the scenario | 3 | 2 | 21 | ||
| There was sufficient time allotted for hands-on participation and group interaction | 2 | 4 | 20 | ||
| The staff met the stated learning objectives | 2 | 2 | 22 | ||
| The staff were knowledgeable and informed | 0 | 5 | 21 | ||
| The staff provided adequate and appropriate feedback | 2 | 4 | 20 | ||
| The debriefing sessions were logically organized and clarified important issues | 1 | 4 | 21 | ||
| The knowledge gained from this session will enhance/influence my practice | 0 | 3 | 23 | ||
| The session helped increase my confidence in treating patients when a crisis occurs | 3 | 4 | 19 | ||
| I would like to attend additional simulation sessions | 2 | 24 | |||
| Of the 26 participants, the following identified these CanMEDS 2005 roles as having been addressed during the session | |||||
| Medical Expert | 21 | ||||
| Collaborator | 8 | ||||
| Professional | 9 | ||||
| Health Advocate | 4 | ||||
| Communicator | 26 | ||||
| Manager | 2 | ||||
| Scholar | 0 | ||||
| Please take a moment to reflect on your previous experience in both simulation and clinical practice. Do you think that simulation has helped your clinical practice? | |||||
| Yes | 26 | ||||
| No | 0 | ||||