| Literature DB >> 28959508 |
Purnima M Rao1, Adam Garber2, Chandrew Rajakumar3, Genevieve Rousseau2, George Dumitrascu1, Glenn D Posner4.
Abstract
This case is one of an eight-case multidisciplinary curriculum designed and implemented at the University of Ottawa by simulation educators with specialty training in obstetrics and gynecology (ob/gyn) and anesthesiology. Consultation with a nurse educator maintained quality and relevance of objectives for nursing participants. The curriculum was prepared to train ob/gyn and anesthesiology residents and nurses to hone crisis resource management skills and to recognize and manage rare/critical medical events in an obstetrical setting. Obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and nurses often work together in acute, high-stakes situations and this curriculum provides a safe environment to practice team-based management of such emergencies. Over an eight-year period, this curriculum has been executed in scenario couplets on a four-year cycle to allow ob/gyn and anesthesiology residents exposure to all scenarios during a five-year residency beginning in their second year. Prospective evaluation data has been positive. For example, over 90% of participants rated these simulations to be 5 out of 5 for "Was an effective use of my educational time" and "Will influence/enhance my future practice". In this scenario, participants must recognize and manage a parturient with spinal cord injury in active labour who develops autonomic dysreflexia. The fetal heart tracing becomes abnormal and the team must respond with urgent delivery. This scenario requires a mannequin for a pelvic exam and a pregnant abdomen. This simulation case includes a case template, critical actions checklist, debriefing guide, summary of key medical content, and an evaluation form for learners to provide feedback.Entities:
Keywords: anesthesiology; crisis resource management; nursing; obstetrics and gynecology; postgraduate medical education; simulation scenario
Year: 2017 PMID: 28959508 PMCID: PMC5612564 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Initial Parameters
BPM: beats per minutes; HPI: history of present illness; PMHx: past medical history; HEENT: heads, eyes, ears, nose, throat; GU: genitourinary.
| Initial Presentation | |||
| Initial vital signs | Blood Pressure: 170/105; Heart Rate: 70; Respiratory Rate: 14; Saturation: 98% on room air; Fetal Heart Rate: 120-140BPM | ||
| Overall Appearance | The patient is lying flat on her back with a cold cloth on their forehead. Blood pressure monitor, saturation probe, and fetal heart monitor have been applied and the monitor is beside the patient. The patient’s partner is by her side looking anxious. The patient is awake, alert, but anxious. | ||
| Actors and roles in the room at case start | Patient – High fidelity mannequin, being voiced from control room, with pregnant abdomen Partner – Confederate actor (could be played by an extra resident or simulation instructor) | ||
| HPI | When asked, the patient will state that she is 26 years old and 37 weeks pregnant with her first pregnancy. She woke up this morning with a headache that worsened throughout the day. She is also sweating and has had a small amount of vaginal spotting. She has no visual changes, epigastric pain or swelling of her legs. She does not feel fetal movements due to her spinal cord injury. She has not noticed any leakage of fluid or rupture of membranes. Her husband will volunteer that they were seen in the pre anesthetic clinic and were told by the anesthesiologist that they needed an early epidural when she went into labour. | ||
| Past Medical/Surgical History | Medications | Allergies | Family History |
| OB – Her pregnancy has been uncomplicated. Her previous ultrasounds were normal. She had several urinary tract infections during her first and second trimesters but none recently. PMHx- She was involved in a motor vehicle accident 2 years ago which resulted in a T5 spinal cord injury (will provide level if asked). Because of her paraplegia she has recurrent urinary tract infections due to self- catheterization. She has had episodes of autonomic dysreflexia in the past due to urinary tract infections. She has no history of head trauma or migraines or previous headache. No previous surgery. | Prenatal vitamins | None | None, including no history of problems with anesthetics. |
| Physical Examination | |||
| General | Awake, alert, anxious. Flushed and diaphoretic. | ||
| HEENT | Normal | ||
| Neck | Normal | ||
| Lungs | Breath sounds equal bilaterally and clear to auscultation | ||
| Cardiovascular | Hypertensive, tachycardic, normal heart sounds, equal pulses bilaterally. | ||
| Abdomen | Pregnant | ||
| Neurological | No movement of lower extremities Hyperreflexic in lower extremities | ||
| Skin | Diaphoretic | ||
| GU | N/A | ||
| Psychiatric | Anxious | ||
Flow of the Scenario
BP: blood pressure; FHR: fetal heart rate; PVCs: premature ventricular contractions; NICU: neonatal intensive care team;
| Instructor Notes – Changes and Case Branch Points | ||
| Intervention / Time point | Change in Case | Additional Information |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Common Errors and Debriefing Strategies
| Error Type | Common Errors Observed | Solutions (Teaching Points) |
| Technical Skills (Medical Knowledge, Clinical Skills) | Does not include Autonomic Dysreflexia (AD) in the differential diagnosis | Directive feedback or group discussion during the debriefing session. Provide reference article on the management of a parturient with a spinal cord injury. |
| Does not know correct antihypertensives or doses | Directive feedback or group discussion during the debriefing session. Provide reference article on the management of autonomic dysreflexia. | |
| Does not recognize or discuss regional anesthesia as an option in a stable patient with AD | Directive feedback or group discussion during the debriefing session. Provide reference article on the management of a parturient with a spinal cord injury. | |
| Uses succinylcholine during induction of General Anesthesia | Directive feedback during the debriefing session. Refer to reference article or textbook chapter on the contraindications to succinylcholine. | |
| Fails to recognize patient’s antepartum anesthesiology consult | Increased awareness of the possibility of this diagnosis through simulation. Ensuring thorough review of patient’s chart. Active listening to patient and her support. | |
| Non Technical Skills (Crisis Resource Management) | Fixation on gestational hypertension/preeclampsia | Discuss three types of fixation errors. Discuss tools for avoiding fixation errors, for example, voicing the differential diagnosis out loud, asking for input from other team members, using a systematic and broad approach to the differential diagnosis. |
| Lack of resource utilization and mobilization of extra resources - Does not call for help from Attending Obstetrician, Anesthesia Assistant, NICU, etc | Discuss available resources (will be centre specific). | |
| Lack of communication between team members | Discuss shared mental model regarding the differential diagnosis and/or management plan. Discuss critical moments for sharing a mental model – for example, before/after transfer to the OR, prior to induction of anesthesia. Discuss closed loop communication. | |
| Failure to recognize changes in Fetal Heart Tracing | Discuss situation monitoring – for example, scanning of monitors at critical moments, before/after transfer to the OR, before/after any significant procedure, during any acute change in vital signs. |
Evaluation Data
| 1 (strongly disagree) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 (strongly agree) | |
| The objectives were made clear | 3 | 13 | |||
| The scenarios were relevant to my practice | 16 | ||||
| The simulation team behaved in an appropriate and believable manner during the scenario | 3 | 13 | |||
| There was sufficient time allotted for hands-on participation and group interaction | 16 | ||||
| The staff met the stated learning objectives | 1 | 15 | |||
| The staff were knowledgeable and informed | 16 | ||||
| The staff provided adequate and appropriate feedback | 1 | 15 | |||
| The debriefing sessions were logically organized and clarified important issues | 16 | ||||
| The knowledge gained from this session will enhance/influence my practice | 16 | ||||
| The session helped increase my confidence in treating patients when a crisis occurs | 2 | 14 | |||
| I would like to attend additional simulation sessions | 1 | 1 | 14 |
Appendix E: Ob/Gyn Anesthesiology Nursing Simulation Curriculum
| YEAR 1 | Autonomic Dysreflexia | Twin Breech Delivery |
| YEAR 2 | MgSO4 Toxicity | Difficult Airway, Emergent Delivery |
| YEAR 3 | Thyroid Storm | Amniotic Fluid Embolism |
| YEAR 4 | Cord Prolapse with Abnormal Fetal Heart Rate | Post Partum Hemorrhage |