| Literature DB >> 29887872 |
Jianwei Lv1,2,3, Nian Liu1, Jianbin Guo1, Zhijun Xu3, Xinping Li1, Zhendong Li1, Huaiyong Luo1, Xiaoping Ren1, Li Huang1, Xiaojing Zhou1, Yuning Chen1, Weigang Chen1, Yong Lei1, Jinxing Tu2, Huifang Jiang1, Boshou Liao1.
Abstract
The peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important grain legume extensively cultivated worldwide, supplying edible oil and protein for human consumption. As in many other crops, plant height is a crucial factor in determining peanut architecture traits and has a unique effect on resistance to lodging and efficiency of mechanized harvesting as well as yield. Currently, the genetic basis underlying plant height remains unclear in peanut, which have hampered marker-assisted selection in breeding. In this study, we conducted a quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis for peanut plant height by using two recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations including "Yuanza 9102 × Xuzhou 68-4 (YX)" and "Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6 (XZ)". In the YX population, 38 QTLs including 10 major QTLs from 9 chromosomes were detected in 4 environments, and 8 consensus QTLs integrated by meta-analysis expressed stably across multiple environments. In the XZ population, 3 major QTLs and seven minor QTLs from 6 chromosomes were detected across 3 environments. Generally, most major QTLs from the two populations were located on pseudomolecule chromosome 9 of Arachis duranesis (A09), indicating there would be key genes on A09 controlling plant height. Further analysis revealed that qPHA09.1a from the XZ population and one consensus QTL, cqPHA09.d from the YX population were co-localized in a reliable 3.4 Mb physical interval on A09, which harbored 161 genes including transcription factors and enzymes related to signaling transduction and cell wall formation. The major and stable QTLs identified in this study may be useful for further gene cloning and identification of molecular markers applicable for breeding.Entities:
Keywords: QTL analysis; RIL population; cultivated peanut; meta-analysis; plant height
Year: 2018 PMID: 29887872 PMCID: PMC5982159 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00684
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Descriptive statistical analysis for plant height (cm) in two RIL populations.
| YX | YX2013 | 29.22 | 53.50 | 25.80–74.38 | 42.09 | 8.16 | −0.38 | 0.41 | 0.98 (0.005) |
| YX2014 | 34.57 | 58.14 | 25.80–61.50 | 41.55 | 6.47 | 0.03 | 0.47 | 0.98 (0.013) | |
| YX2015 | 32.62 | 46.85 | 28.40–60.30 | 41.04 | 5.75 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.96 (0.000) | |
| YX2016 | 32.50 | 47.85 | 26.70–48.70 | 35.14 | 4.17 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.99 (0.088) | |
| XZ | XZ2014 | 32.64 | 31.63 | 28.00–66.70 | 44.00 | 7.38 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 0.99 (0.162) |
| XZ2015 | 34.00 | 37.25 | 21.86–61.54 | 38.24 | 7.02 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.99 (0.192) | |
| XZ2016 | 35.83 | 42.38 | 17.68–51.41 | 33.29 | 5.91 | 0.07 | 0.26 | 0.99 (0.429) |
Pop, population; Env, environment; P1, female parent; P2, male parent; SD, standard deviation; Kurt, kurtosis; Skew, skewness; w, Shariro-Wilk statistic value; Sig, significance; YX, “Yuanza9102 × Xuzhou 68-4”RIL population; XZ, “Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6” RIL population.
Figure 1Phenotype distribution of plant height in two RIL populations. The y-axis represents frequency; the x-axis represents value of plant height. YX “Yuanza9102 × Xuzhou 68-4” RIL population, XZ “Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6” RIL population. Red and blue arrows denote female and male parents, respectively.
Two-way ANOVA of variance for plant height in two RIL populations across multiple environments.
| YX | Genotype | 194 | 31,363.47 | 161.67 | 11.35 | < 0.001 |
| Environment | 3 | 11,021.13 | 3673.71 | 258.00 | < 0.001 | |
| Genotype × Environment | 578 | 17,812.32 | 30.82 | 2.16 | < 0.001 | |
| Error | 585 | 8,329.96 | 14.24 | |||
| XZ | Genotype | 186 | 31,449.29 | 169.08 | 8.61 | < 0.001 |
| Environment | 2 | 14,262.94 | 7,131.47 | 363.25 | < 0.001 | |
| Genotype × Environment | 370 | 6,389.14 | 17.27 | 0.88 | 0.89 | |
| Error | 360 | 7,067.75 | 19.63 |
YX, “Yuanza9102 × Xuzhou 68-4” RIL population; XZ,“Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6” RIL population.
QTLs of plant height were detected in two populations across multiple environments.
| YX | 2013 | A09 | 21.01 | 11.27 | 20.70–21.20 | 3.68 | 19.67 | |
| 2013 | A09 | 24.91 | 16.34 | 24.50–25.00 | 4.18 | 25.73 | ||
| 2013 | A09 | 26.91 | 16.72 | 26.60–27.00 | 4.21 | 26.27 | ||
| 2013 | A09 | 33.91 | 11.59 | 32.90–41.40 | 3.96 | 23.22 | ||
| 2013 | B03 | 44.71 | 6.89 | 41.90–52.20 | 2.48 | 9.13 | ||
| 2013 | B05 | 39.91 | 5.88 | 39.60–40.20 | 2.54 | 8.53 | ||
| 2013 | B05 | 47.41 | 9.12 | 46.80–47.80 | 3.30 | 12.49 | ||
| 2013 | B05 | 54.91 | 5.46 | 54.10–56.10 | 2.49 | 7.78 | ||
| 2014 | A01 | 0.01 | 4.51 | 0.00–1.70 | 1.51 | 4.90 | ||
| 2014 | A01 | 32.71 | 3.64 | 31.40–33.80 | 1.34 | 3.99 | ||
| 2014 | A05 | 83.71 | 4.42 | 82.90–86.40 | 1.48 | 4.84 | ||
| 2014 | A09 | 21.01 | 6.30 | 19.90–22.10 | 1.94 | 8.33 | ||
| 2014 | A09 | 26.91 | 7.09 | 26.60–27.40 | 2.04 | 9.32 | ||
| 2014 | A09 | 29.41 | 7.95 | 29.00–29.60 | 2.12 | 10.25 | ||
| 2014 | A09 | 33.91 | 4.52 | 31.30–34.90 | 1.93 | 8.17 | ||
| 2014 | B02 | 57.31 | 3.83 | 56.50–59.00 | 1.39 | 4.17 | ||
| 2014 | B03 | 40.91 | 7.79 | 33.80–44.30 | 2.15 | 9.96 | ||
| 2014 | B04 | 49.71 | 4.88 | 47.80–49.90 | 1.85 | 6.27 | ||
| 2014 | B04 | 51.71 | 5.42 | 51.30–52.00 | 1.95 | 6.79 | ||
| 2014 | B04 | 55.51 | 4.64 | 55.00–56.00 | 1.74 | 5.86 | ||
| 2014 | B05 | 70.81 | 5.27 | 69.30–71.40 | 1.85 | 6.92 | ||
| 2014 | B05 | 80.31 | 7.71 | 80.00–81.80 | 2.49 | 12.85 | ||
| 2014 | B08 | 16.81 | 4.19 | 13.40–19.50 | 1.51 | 4.68 | ||
| 2014 | B08 | 22.11 | 4.45 | 21.10–24.90 | 1.64 | 5.51 | ||
| 2015 | A05 | 86.41 | 4.50 | 84.10–86.90 | 1.54 | 6.88 | ||
| 2015 | A05 | 91.21 | 4.67 | 90.30–91.30 | 1.64 | 7.97 | ||
| 2015 | A09 | 24.51 | 3.08 | 23.40–25.20 | 1.29 | 4.64 | ||
| 2015 | B08 | 9.01 | 4.03 | 1.10–13.40 | 1.77 | 9.18 | ||
| 2015 | B08 | 21.11 | 5.85 | 19.50–22.80 | 1.76 | 8.96 | ||
| 2016 | A05 | 93.51 | 3.83 | 92.50–98.80 | 0.97 | 5.10 | ||
| 2016 | A09 | 21.21 | 13.15 | 20.60–21.40 | 2.03 | 22.28 | ||
| 2016 | A09 | 24.41 | 14.97 | 24.10–24.50 | 2.13 | 24.74 | ||
| 2016 | A09 | 27.71 | 4.26 | 27.40–28.10 | 1.41 | 6.23 | ||
| 2016 | B05 | 56.11 | 6.03 | 54.40–56.40 | 1.35 | 8.37 | ||
| 2016 | B05 | 60.01 | 7.57 | 59.30–60.70 | 1.45 | 10.31 | ||
| 2016 | B10 | 49.11 | 3.59 | 48.60–49.50 | −0.94 | 4.83 | ||
| 2016 | B10 | 55.81 | 4.50 | 55.50–56.20 | −1.05 | 5.96 | ||
| 2016 | B10 | 62.31 | 3.67 | 61.70–64.30 | −0.96 | 4.92 | ||
| XZ | 2014 | A09 | 34.91 | 3.73 | 29.80–36.10 | 2.04 | 7.52 | |
| 2014 | B10 | 86.61 | 3.42 | 83.20–108.20 | −1.88 | 6.41 | ||
| 2015 | A05 | 89.21 | 4.29 | 87.90–89.50 | 2.02 | 8.16 | ||
| 2015 | B04 | 15.81 | 5.11 | 9.80–18.10 | 2.50 | 11.97 | ||
| 2015 | B04 | 22.11 | 5.64 | 18.10–25.40 | 2.53 | 12.03 | ||
| 2016 | A09 | 37.41 | 5.51 | 36.40–38.40 | 1.95 | 10.63 | ||
| 2016 | A09 | 42.91 | 5.50 | 42.10–45.40 | 1.90 | 9.91 | ||
| 2016 | B03 | 37.01 | 3.59 | 34.90–40.60 | −1.75 | 8.60 | ||
| 2016 | B03 | 51.31 | 3.88 | 50.90–52.30 | −1.57 | 6.91 | ||
| 2016 | B08 | 1.01 | 3.70 | 0.00–6.00 | −1.54 | 6.73 |
YX,“Yuanza9102 × Xuzhou 68-4” RIL population; XZ, “Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6” RIL population; LG, linkage group; LOD, logarithm of odds; CI, 2-LOD confidence interval; PVE, phenotypic variation explained.
Figure 2Distribution of QTLs for plant height in the genetic map of the YX population. Consistent QTLs obtained through meta-analysis are highlighted in red color on bars of linkage groups. A dashed box denotes a hot spot QTL region. YX “Yuanza9102 × Xuzhou 68-4” RIL population.
Consensus QTLs of plant height through meta-analysis in multiple environments.
| A05 | 85.54 | 84.55–86.53 | ||
| A09 | 21.04 | 20.87–21.22 | ||
| A09 | 24.60 | 24.44–24.75 | ||
| A09 | 26.91 | 26.73–27.08 | ||
| A09 | 33.90 | 32.25–35.56 | ||
| B03 | 42.84 | 39.17–46.52 | ||
| B05 | 55.51 | 54.80–56.21 | ||
| B08 | 21.53 | 20.29–22.78 |
LG, linkage group; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3Distribution of QTLs for plant height in the genetic map of XZ population. Dashed box denoted hot spot QTL region. XZ “Xuhua 13 × Zhonghua 6” RIL population.
Figure 4Overview of genetic and physical co-localized region on chromosome A09. (A) Genetic linkage groups mapping on physical chromosome A09. (B–D) The top ten terms of GO annotation among biological process (B), molecular function (C) and cellular component (D). (E) Hierarchical clustering of expression pattern in different organisms of the cultivated peanut. The values of transcript abundance were taken from (Clevenger et al., 2016).