| Literature DB >> 29887775 |
Doo-San Shin1, Gwang-Il Heo1, Soo-Hyeong Son1, Chang-Sik Oh2, Young-Kee Lee3, Jae-Soon Cha1.
Abstract
Fast and accurate diagnosis is needed to eradicate and manage economically important and invasive diseases like fire blight. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is known as the best on-site diagnostic, because it is fast, highly specific to a target, and less sensitive to inhibitors in samples. In this study, LAMP assay that gives more consistent results for on-site diagnosis of fire blight than the previous developed LAMP assays was developed. Primers for new LAMP assay (named as DS-LAMP) were designed from a histidine-tRNA ligase gene (EAMY_RS32025) of E. amylovora CFBP1430 genome. The DS-LAMP amplified DNA (positive detection) only from genomic DNA of E. amylovora strains, not from either E. pyrifoliae (causing black shoot blight) or from Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae (causing shoot blight on apple trees). The detection limit of DS-LAMP was 10 cells per LAMP reaction, equivalent to 104 cells per ml of the sample extract. DS-LAMP successfully diagnosed the pathogens on four fire-blight infected apple and pear orchards. In addition, it could distinguish black shoot blight from fire blight. The Bühlmann-LAMP, developed previously for on-site diagnosis of fire blight, did not give consistent results for specificity to E. amylovora and on-site diagnosis; it gave positive reactions to three strains of E. pyrifoliae and two strains of P. syringae pv. syringae. It also, gave positive reactions to some healthy sample extracts. DS-LAMP, developed in this study, would give more accurate on-site diagnosis of fire blight, especially in the Republic of Korea, where fire blight and black shoot blight coexist.Entities:
Keywords: LAMP assay; apple; fire blight; on-site diagnosis; pear
Year: 2018 PMID: 29887775 PMCID: PMC5985645 DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.FT.03.2018.0055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Pathol J ISSN: 1598-2254 Impact factor: 1.795
Bacterial strains used in this study and their reaction by LAMP assays
| Bacterial species | Strains | Disease/Host | Source | LAMP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| DS | Bühlmann | ||||
| YKB 12316 | FB/pear | RDA | + | + | |
| YKB 12317 | FB/pear | RDA | + | + | |
| YKB 12318 | FB/apple | RDA | + | + | |
| YKB 12319 | FB/apple | RDA | + | + | |
| YKB 12320 | FB/pear | RDA | + | + | |
| YKB 12321 | FB/pear | RDA | + | + | |
| YKB 12322 | FB/apple | RDA | + | + | |
| YKB 12323 | FB/apple | RDA | + | + | |
| KACC 13945 | BSB/nk | KACC | − | − | |
| KACC 13947 | BSB/nk | KACC | − | +(1/3) | |
| KACC 13948 | BSB/nk | KACC | − | − | |
| KACC 13949 | BSB/nk | KACC | − | − | |
| KACC 13952 | BSB/nk | KACC | − | +(3/3) | |
| YKB 12324 | BSB/apple | RDA | − | − | |
| YKB 12325 | BSB/apple | RDA | − | +(2/3) | |
| YKB 12326 | BSB/apple | RDA | − | − | |
| YKB 12327 | BSB/apple | RDA | − | − | |
| YKB 12328 | BSB/apple | RDA | − | − | |
| SHPS 005 | SB/apple | ANU | − | − | |
| SHPS 007 | SB/apple | ANU | − | − | |
| SHPS 022 | SB/apple | ANU | − | +(1/3) | |
| SHPS 0056 | SB/apple | ANU | − | − | |
| WSPS 039 | SB/apple | ANU | − | +(1/3) | |
| WSPS 042 | SB/apple | ANU | − | − | |
| WSPS 048 | SB/apple | ANU | − | − | |
| WSPS 050 | SB/apple | ANU | − | − | |
FB, Fire blight; BSB, Black shoot blight; SB, Shoot blight; nk, not known.
KACC, Korean Agricultural Culture Collection; RDA, Rural Development Administration; ANU, Andong National University.
DS-LAMP, this study; Bühlmann-LAMP (Bühlmann et al., 2013): +, positive reaction with 3 replications; −, negative reaction with 3 replications.
LAMP primers used in this study
| Target | Primer | Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| EAMY_RS32025 (DS primers) | F3 | ATAATAAGAGAATGGCGCTATG |
| B3 | TCTACATCTCCACCTTTGG | |
| FIP | TAATGAAGTTGAATCTCAGGCATGAGAAAAAATCCATTGTAAAACCTTCG | |
| BIP | GATGGATTGCTTAGTGAGCTCAGCCAATCTCTCCACAACCG | |
| LoopF | AAAGTTGTTTTCATCCCACGGA | |
| EAMY RS32035 (Bühlmann’s primers | F3 | TCAAGATCGTGTGGCTATG |
| B3 | CTAAAAACCGGGGCAAAC | |
| FIP | ACGRTTCTACCCTTCCTGTCTACTTCTCTGGGGTTTCAGTC | |
| BIP | ATGTCACCTGATTCTACAGCCGCAATCATTCATGGTTCTGGAC | |
| LoopF | ACATTAGCGGCCCGACCAA | |
| LoopR | CTRTTAAGATGGCATGCAGA |
Bühlmann et al (2013).
F3 and B3, outer primers; FIP and BIP, inner primers; loopF and loopR, forward and reverse loop primers.
Fig. 1DNA amplification curves of representative strains of Erwinia amylovora (Ea), E. pyrifoliae (Ep), and Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae (Pss) by DS-LAMP (A) and Bühlmann-LAMP (B) carried out with Genie III (OptiGene Ltd, West Sussex, UK). Purified genomic DNA (10 ng) was used; Ea YKB 12316 (black circle), Ea YKB 12317 (hollow Circle), Ep KACC 13952 (black square), Ep YKB 12325 (hollow square), Pss SHPS 022 (black triangle), Pss WSPS 039 (hollow triangle). Distilled water was as a negative control (black line).
Fig. 2DNA amplification curves with different concentration of the inner primer in DS-LAMP (A) and Bühlmann-LAMP (B). Concentrations of outer primers and loop primers were fixed at 0.2 μM and 0.8 μM, respectively. The genomic DNA of Ea YKB12316 was used as a DNA template, and LAMP assays were carried out at 65°C for 30 min.
Fig. 3DS-LAMP detection sensitivity to Erwinia amylovora from the sample extracts. The 0.5 ml of serially diluted suspensions of E. amylovora YKB 12316 (108–104 cells/ml) was pitched in 4.5 ml antioxidant maceration buffer containing subcortical tissues (0.1–0.2 g) of a healthy pear twig placed in a plastic bag. Outside of the plastic bag was hammered lightly with the lubber hammer, and 1 μl of the extract was used for DS LAMP (A). Regression curve (B) was y = −2.285x + 23.325, and R2 was 0.9836.
On-site diagnosis of fire blight with DS-LAMP and Bühlmann-LAMP assays
| Location | Host | Sample | LAMP | Isolation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Bühlmann | DS | ||||
| Anseong, Seoun 1 | pear | Twig with canker-1 | + | + | Ea |
| Twig with canker-2 | + | + | Ea | ||
| Twig with canker-3 | + | + | Ea | ||
| Healthy twig | − | − | |||
| Sejong, Bugang | pear | Twig with canker-1 | − | − | − |
| Twig with canker-2 | − | − | − | ||
| Twig with canker-3 | − | − | − | ||
| Branch with canker-4 | − | − | − | ||
| Branch with canker-5 | − | − | − | ||
| Anseong, Seoun 2 | pear | Twig with canker -1 | + | + | Ea |
| Twig with canker -2 | + | + | Ea | ||
| Healthy twig -1 | − | − | − | ||
| Healthy twig -2 | − | − | − | ||
| Anseong, Miyang | pear | Blacken Leafstalk | + | + | Ea |
| Twig with canker | + | + | Ea | ||
| Trunk with canker | + | + | Ea | ||
| Healthy leafstalk | − | − | |||
| Healthy twig | − | − | − | ||
| Healthy leafstalk | − | − | − | ||
| Healthy branch | − | − | − | ||
| Cheonan, Seobuk | apple | Ooze on fruitlet | + | + | Ea |
| Twig with canker | + | + | Ea | ||
| Trunk with canker | + | + | Ea | ||
| Ooze on twig | + | + | Ea | ||
| Blacken leafstalk | + | + | Ea | ||
| Healthy twig | − | − | − | ||
| Kwangju, Namjong | apple | Twig with canker | − | − | Ep |
| Blacken leafstalk | − | − | Ep | ||
| Twig with canker | − | − | Ep | ||
| Branch with canker | − | − | Ep | ||
| Healthy twig-1 | − | − | − | ||
| Healthy twig-2 | − | − | − | ||
Healthy plant samples collected from healthy trees near diseased trees with typical symptoms
+, DNA amplification within 30 min by LAMP assays; −, no DNA amplification within 30 min by LAMP assays
Isolated pathogens from the sample extracts. Ea, E. amylovora; Ep, E. pyrifoliae; −, no pathogen isolated