Literature DB >> 29887359

How Reliable Is the Cell Count Analysis in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection?

Akos Zahar1, Christian Lausmann1, Camila Cavalheiro2, Anoop C Dhamangaonkar3, Tommaso Bonanzinga4, Thorsten Gehrke1, Mustafa Citak1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Synovial analysis of joint aspirates is a key diagnostic tool; all major diagnostic algorithms include cell count (CC) and polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%) as important criteria to make the diagnosis. In this context, we conducted this study to analyze the overall accuracy of CC and PMN%.
METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed with clinical data of included patients, with a total of 524 preoperative joint aspirations (255 hips, 269 knees). From the aspirated synovial fluid, we tested the leukocyte esterase activity, leukocyte CC, and PMN%, and sent specimens for aerobic and anaerobic bacterial culture. Depending on the clinical results in accordance with the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for prosthetic joint infection (PJI), 203 patients were then admitted for aseptic revision and 134 patients for septic exchange.
RESULTS: In 337 cases (64.3% of the study patients), it was possible to measure the CC. The best cutoff level for PJI of all study patients was 2582 leukocytes/μL (sensitivity [SE] 80.6%, specificity [SP] 85.2%) and a PMN% of 66.1% (SE 80.6%, SP 83.3%). The chosen cutoff levels for PJI of total knee and total hip arthroplasty were 1630 leukocytes/μL (SE 83.6%, SP 82.2%) and a PMN% of 60.5% (SE 80.3%, SP 77.1%) and 3063 leukocytes/μL (SE 78.1%, SP 80.0%) and a PMN% of 66.1% (SE 82.2%, SP 82.4%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CC and PMN% are sensitive methods for diagnosing PJI of total hip and total knee arthroplasty. However, there are differences in cutoff levels between knees and hips. International guidelines and diagnostic criteria need revisions in terms of these parameters.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell count; cutoff level; joint aspiration; prosthetic joint infection (PJI); synovial analysis; total joint arthroplasty (TJA)

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29887359     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of implant debris-associated inflammation.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Jiri Gallo; Emmanuel Gibon; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 2.  Twenty common errors in the diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Nora Renz; Andrej Trampuz; Cristina Ojeda-Thies
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Soluble Pecam-1 as a Biomarker in Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Michael Fuchs; Andrej Trampuz; Stephanie Kirschbaum; Tobias Winkler; F Andrea Sass
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Combination of Synovial Fluid IL-4 and Polymorphonuclear Cell Percentage Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Jiaxing Huang; Jiawei Wang; Leilei Qin; Bo Zhu; Wei Huang; Ning Hu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.