Literature DB >> 29887307

Division of Labor during Biofilm Matrix Production.

Anna Dragoš1, Heiko Kiesewalter2, Marivic Martin1, Chih-Yu Hsu3, Raimo Hartmann4, Tobias Wechsler5, Carsten Eriksen6, Susanne Brix6, Knut Drescher7, Nicola Stanley-Wall3, Rolf Kümmerli5, Ákos T Kovács8.   

Abstract

Organisms as simple as bacteria can engage in complex collective actions, such as group motility and fruiting body formation. Some of these actions involve a division of labor, where phenotypically specialized clonal subpopulations or genetically distinct lineages cooperate with each other by performing complementary tasks. Here, we combine experimental and computational approaches to investigate potential benefits arising from division of labor during biofilm matrix production. We show that both phenotypic and genetic strategies for a division of labor can promote collective biofilm formation in the soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis. In this species, biofilm matrix consists of two major components, exopolysaccharides (EPSs) and TasA. We observed that clonal groups of B. subtilis phenotypically segregate into three subpopulations composed of matrix non-producers, EPS producers, and generalists, which produce both EPSs and TasA. This incomplete phenotypic specialization was outperformed by a genetic division of labor, where two mutants, engineered as specialists, complemented each other by exchanging EPSs and TasA. The relative fitness of the two mutants displayed a negative frequency dependence both in vitro and on plant roots, with strain frequency reaching a stable equilibrium at 30% TasA producers, corresponding exactly to the population composition where group productivity is maximized. Using individual-based modeling, we show that asymmetries in strain ratio can arise due to differences in the relative benefits that matrix compounds generate for the collective and that genetic division of labor can be favored when it breaks metabolic constraints associated with the simultaneous production of two matrix components.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus subtilis; EPS; TasA; biofilm; competition; cooperation; division of labor; pellicle; phenotypic heterogeneity; plant colonization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29887307      PMCID: PMC6331042          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  58 in total

Review 1.  Social evolution theory for microorganisms.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin; Andy Gardner; Stephen P Diggle
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  The sociobiology of biofilms.

Authors:  Carey D Nadell; Joao B Xavier; Kevin R Foster
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 16.408

3.  Life after death: the critical role of extracellular DNA in microbial biofilms.

Authors:  N S Jakubovics; R C Shields; N Rajarajan; J G Burgess
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.858

4.  Plasmid-encoded ComI inhibits competence in the ancestral 3610 strain of Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Melissa A Konkol; Kris M Blair; Daniel B Kearns
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Osmotic pressure can regulate matrix gene expression in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Shmuel M Rubinstein; Ilana Kolodkin-Gal; Anna McLoon; Liraz Chai; Roberto Kolter; Richard Losick; David A Weitz
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 7.  Exploiting social evolution in biofilms.

Authors:  Kerry E Boyle; Silja Heilmann; Dave van Ditmarsch; Joao B Xavier
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  Bistability and biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Yunrong Chai; Frances Chu; Roberto Kolter; Richard Losick
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  The Black Queen Hypothesis: evolution of dependencies through adaptive gene loss.

Authors:  J Jeffrey Morris; Richard E Lenski; Erik R Zinser
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Impact of Salt and Nutrient Content on Biofilm Formation by Vibrio fischeri.

Authors:  Anne E Marsden; Kevin Grudzinski; Jakob M Ondrey; Cindy R DeLoney-Marino; Karen L Visick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  58 in total

1.  Positive linkage between bacterial social traits reveals that homogeneous rather than specialised behavioral repertoires prevail in natural Pseudomonas communities.

Authors:  Jos Kramer; Miguel Ángel López Carrasco; Rolf Kümmerli
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 2.  Biofilms 2018: A diversity of microbes and mechanisms.

Authors:  Clay Fuqua; Alain Filloux; Jean-Marc Ghigo; Karen L Visick
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Emerging Roles of Functional Bacterial Amyloids in Gene Regulation, Toxicity, and Immunomodulation.

Authors:  Nir Salinas; Tatyana L Povolotsky; Meytal Landau; Ilana Kolodkin-Gal
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Individual- versus group-optimality in the production of secreted bacterial compounds.

Authors:  Konstanze T Schiessl; Adin Ross-Gillespie; Daniel M Cornforth; Michael Weigert; Colette Bigosch; Sam P Brown; Martin Ackermann; Rolf Kümmerli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation and social interactions.

Authors:  Sofia Arnaouteli; Natalie C Bamford; Nicola R Stanley-Wall; Ákos T Kovács
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Defining the Expression, Production, and Signaling Roles of Specialized Metabolites during Bacillus subtilis Differentiation.

Authors:  Alexi A Schoenborn; Sarah M Yannarell; E Diane Wallace; Haley Clapper; Ilon C Weinstein; Elizabeth A Shank
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  6S-2 RNA deletion in the undomesticated B. subtilis strain NCIB 3610 causes a biofilm derepression phenotype.

Authors:  Marietta Thüring; Sweetha Ganapathy; M Amri C Schlüter; Marcus Lechner; Roland K Hartmann
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 8.  Metabolic Heterogeneity and Cross-Feeding in Bacterial Multicellular Systems.

Authors:  Christopher R Evans; Christopher P Kempes; Alexa Price-Whelan; Lars E P Dietrich
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 17.079

9.  Cryptic surface-associated multicellularity emerges through cell adhesion and its regulation.

Authors:  Jordi van Gestel; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Deletion of Rap-Phr systems in Bacillus subtilis influences in vitro biofilm formation and plant root colonization.

Authors:  Mathilde Nordgaard; Rasmus Møller Rosenbek Mortensen; Nikolaj Kaae Kirk; Ramses Gallegos-Monterrosa; Ákos T Kovács
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.