Literature DB >> 32862759

6S-2 RNA deletion in the undomesticated B. subtilis strain NCIB 3610 causes a biofilm derepression phenotype.

Marietta Thüring1, Sweetha Ganapathy1, M Amri C Schlüter1, Marcus Lechner2, Roland K Hartmann1.   

Abstract

Bacterial 6S RNA regulates transcription via binding to the active site of RNA polymerase holoenzymes. 6S RNA has been identified in the majority of bacteria, in most cases encoded by a single gene. Firmicutes including Bacillus subtilis encode two 6S RNA paralogs, 6S-1 and 6S-2 RNA. Hypothesizing that the regulatory role of 6S RNAs may be particularly important under natural, constantly changing environmental conditions, we constructed 6S RNA deletion mutants of the undomesticated B. subtilis wild-type strain NCIB 3610. We observed a strong phenotype for the ∆6S-2 RNA strain that showed increased biofilm formation on solid media and the ability to form surface-attached biofilms in liquid culture. This phenotype remained undetected in derived laboratory strains (168, PY79) that are defective in biofilm formation. Quantitative RT-PCR data revealed transcriptional upregulation of biofilm marker genes such as tasA, epsA and bslA in the ∆6S-2 RNA strain, particularly during transition from exponential to stationary growth phase. Salt stress, which blocks sporulation at a very early stage, was found to override the derepressed biofilm phenotype of the ∆6S-2 RNA strain. Furthermore, the ∆6S-2 RNA strain showed retarded swarming activity and earlier spore formation. Finally, the ∆6S-1&2 RNA double deletion strain showed a prolonged lag phase of growth under oxidative, high salt and alkaline stress conditions, suggesting that the interplay of both 6S RNAs in B. subtilis optimizes and fine-tunes transcriptomic adaptations, thereby contributing to the fitness of B. subtilis under the unsteady and temporarily harsh conditions encountered in natural habitats.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bslA ; epsA ; tasA ; 6S-1 and 6S-2 RNA deletions; biofilm derepression phenotype; biofilm marker genes; high osmolarity stress; oxidative stress; salt stress; undomesticated B. subtilis NCIB 3610 strain

Year:  2020        PMID: 32862759      PMCID: PMC7834083          DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2020.1795408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA Biol        ISSN: 1547-6286            Impact factor:   4.652


  66 in total

Review 1.  SigB-dependent general stress response in Bacillus subtilis and related gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Michael Hecker; Jan Pané-Farré; Uwe Völker
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 15.500

2.  Legionella pneumophila 6S RNA optimizes intracellular multiplication.

Authors:  Sébastien P Faucher; Gilgi Friedlander; Jonathan Livny; Hanah Margalit; Howard A Shuman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Construction of a cloning site near one end of Tn917 into which foreign DNA may be inserted without affecting transposition in Bacillus subtilis or expression of the transposon-borne erm gene.

Authors:  P Youngman; J B Perkins; R Losick
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Two distinct types of 6S RNA in Prochlorococcus.

Authors:  Ilka M Axmann; Julia Holtzendorff; Björn Voss; Philip Kensche; Wolfgang R Hess
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  6S RNA Mimics B-Form DNA to Regulate Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase.

Authors:  James Chen; Karen M Wassarman; Shili Feng; Katherine Leon; Andrey Feklistov; Jared T Winkelman; Zongli Li; Thomas Walz; Elizabeth A Campbell; Seth A Darst
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Regulation of 6S RNA by pRNA synthesis is required for efficient recovery from stationary phase in E. coli and B. subtilis.

Authors:  Amy T Cavanagh; Jamie M Sperger; Karen M Wassarman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Experimental RNomics in Aquifex aeolicus: identification of small non-coding RNAs and the putative 6S RNA homolog.

Authors:  Dagmar K Willkomm; Jens Minnerup; Alexander Hüttenhofer; Roland K Hartmann
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Factors that mediate and prevent degradation of the inactive and unstable GudB protein in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Lorena Stannek; Katrin Gunka; Rachel A Care; Ulf Gerth; Fabian M Commichau
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Initiating nucleotide identity determines efficiency of RNA synthesis from 6S RNA templates in Bacillus subtilis but not Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ignacio J Cabrera-Ostertag; Amy T Cavanagh; Karen M Wassarman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Mechanistic comparison of Bacillus subtilis 6S-1 and 6S-2 RNAs--commonalities and differences.

Authors:  Olga Y Burenina; Philipp G Hoch; Katrin Damm; Margarita Salas; Timofei S Zatsepin; Marcus Lechner; Tatiana S Oretskaya; Elena A Kubareva; Roland K Hartmann
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.942

View more
  3 in total

1.  6S RNA-Dependent Susceptibility to RNA Polymerase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Marick Esberard; Marc Hallier; Wenfeng Liu; Claire Morvan; Lionello Bossi; Nara Figueroa-Bossi; Brice Felden; Philippe Bouloc
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 5.938

2.  A Sporulation-Specific sRNA Bvs196 Contributing to the Developing Spore in Bacillus velezensis.

Authors:  Tingting Xu; Xiangying Li; Kerong Chen; Haoxin Qin; Zhengkai Yi; Yuan Meng; Zhenyu Liu
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Involvement of E. coli 6S RNA in Oxidative Stress Response.

Authors:  Olga Y Burenina; Daria A Elkina; Anna Ovcharenko; Valeria A Bannikova; M Amri C Schlüter; Tatiana S Oretskaya; Roland K Hartmann; Elena A Kubareva
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.