Chi Sun1, Hongli Wang1, Jianyuan Jiang2, Feizhou Lu3, Xiaosheng Ma1, Xinlei Xia1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Orthopedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: jjyfudanspine@126.com. 3. Department of Orthopedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; The Fifth People' s Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To radiologically measure the parameters of endplates and the apophyseal ring and to suggest an applicable length for a lumbar interbody cage for Chinese patients. METHODS: Twenty-four volunteers were enrolled to undergo lumbar computed tomography (CT). On the endplate plane, the diameters of the endplates (L1-S1) were measured along the axis of the cage with different lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Whereas the mid-oblique diameter (mid-OD) and maximum oblique diameter (max-OD) were defined as the minimal and maximal diameters of the endplates in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), side-sagittal diameter (side-SD), mid-sagittal diameter (mid-SD), and transverse diameter (TD) represented the diameters of endplates in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF); and oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF)/extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), /direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF), respectively. R1-R10 were the widths of the apophyseal ring covered by diameters at both ends. We used the proposed formula to calculate the cage length: 1) minimal length of TLIF cage = mid-OD - ½ (R1 + R2), 2) maximal length of TLIF cage = max-OD - ½ (R3 + R4), 3) length of PLIF cage = side-SD - ½ (R5 + R6), 4) length of OLIF/XLIF/DLIF cage = TD - ½ (R7 + R8), and 5) length of ALIF cage = mid-SD - ½ (R9 + R10). RESULTS: The lengths of the TLIF cage were more than 30 mm for men and 26 mm for women in L1/2-L4/5, with a large range in L5-S1. For PLIF, the lengths were 28 to 30 mm for men and 24 to 26 mm for women in L1/2-L4/5, with 26 mm and 22 mm, respectively, in L5-S1. For the OLIF/XLIF/DLIF cage, the lengths were 38 mm in L1/2 and 41 to 43 mm in L2/3-L4/5 for men and 35 mm in L1/2-L2/3 and 38 mm in L3/4-L4/5 for women. The ALIF cage lengths were 27 mm in L1/2 and L5-S1 and 29 mm in L2/3-L4/5 for men and 23 mm in L1/2 and L5-S1 and 25 mm in L2/3-L4/5 for women. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of an appropriate length for a lumbar interbody cage should be based on the procedure and fusion level, which can match the endplates anatomically. The size of the lumbar interbody cage is affected by many factors, and a simple calculation may not be clinically relevant.
OBJECTIVE: To radiologically measure the parameters of endplates and the apophyseal ring and to suggest an applicable length for a lumbar interbody cage for Chinese patients. METHODS: Twenty-four volunteers were enrolled to undergo lumbar computed tomography (CT). On the endplate plane, the diameters of the endplates (L1-S1) were measured along the axis of the cage with different lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Whereas the mid-oblique diameter (mid-OD) and maximum oblique diameter (max-OD) were defined as the minimal and maximal diameters of the endplates in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), side-sagittal diameter (side-SD), mid-sagittal diameter (mid-SD), and transverse diameter (TD) represented the diameters of endplates in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF); and oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF)/extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), /direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF), respectively. R1-R10 were the widths of the apophyseal ring covered by diameters at both ends. We used the proposed formula to calculate the cage length: 1) minimal length of TLIF cage = mid-OD - ½ (R1 + R2), 2) maximal length of TLIF cage = max-OD - ½ (R3 + R4), 3) length of PLIF cage = side-SD - ½ (R5 + R6), 4) length of OLIF/XLIF/DLIF cage = TD - ½ (R7 + R8), and 5) length of ALIF cage = mid-SD - ½ (R9 + R10). RESULTS: The lengths of the TLIF cage were more than 30 mm for men and 26 mm for women in L1/2-L4/5, with a large range in L5-S1. For PLIF, the lengths were 28 to 30 mm for men and 24 to 26 mm for women in L1/2-L4/5, with 26 mm and 22 mm, respectively, in L5-S1. For the OLIF/XLIF/DLIF cage, the lengths were 38 mm in L1/2 and 41 to 43 mm in L2/3-L4/5 for men and 35 mm in L1/2-L2/3 and 38 mm in L3/4-L4/5 for women. The ALIF cage lengths were 27 mm in L1/2 and L5-S1 and 29 mm in L2/3-L4/5 for men and 23 mm in L1/2 and L5-S1 and 25 mm in L2/3-L4/5 for women. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of an appropriate length for a lumbar interbody cage should be based on the procedure and fusion level, which can match the endplates anatomically. The size of the lumbar interbody cage is affected by many factors, and a simple calculation may not be clinically relevant.