Literature DB >> 2988317

Reproducibility of T1 and T2 relaxation times calculated from routine MR imaging sequences: phantom study.

B O Kjos, R L Ehman, M Brant-Zawadzki.   

Abstract

Measurement of T1 and T2 relaxation times has been sought as one fundamental way to characterize tissue. Relaxation times can be calculated from routine spin-echo (SE) imaging sequences using two distinct repetition times (TRs), each with two SE samplings of signal intensity. Previous reports have quantified relaxation times without discussing the variation in their measurements. By imaging a phantom containing different samples with known T1 and T2 relaxation times on three separate occasions, the variation in relaxation time measurements inherent in different routine imaging sequences was studied. For the present study a more complete and accurate equation was used to calculate T1 values. The variation in T1 and T2 relaxation times for samples with relaxation times similar to solid tissue was 2%-4%. The amount of variability in calculated relaxation times was found to be dependent on the magnitude of the relaxation times themselves. However, the mean values were independent of the imaging sequences used to calculate the relaxation times. No significant differences were seen between left-to-right or section-to-section position within the same study or between studies performed on different occasions. The variability in the calculated T1 was dependent on the pair of TR sequences used to calculate T1. Samples with long T1 and T2 relaxation times, similar to many body fluids, had much larger variability. A computer simulation of measurement error was created to explain these results. This study indicates that properly performed routine imaging studies do yield reproducible T1 and T2 measurements.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2988317     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.144.6.1157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Age distribution and iron dependency of the T2 relaxation time in the globus pallidus and putamen.

Authors:  C Schenker; D Meier; W Wichmann; P Boesiger; A Valavanis
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  MRI of pituitary macroadenomas with reference to hormonal activity.

Authors:  P Lundin; R Nyman; P Burman; P O Lundberg; C Muhr
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance update.

Authors:  E Schneider; M Nessaiver
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  T2 Distribution in the Forearm Muscles and the T2 Threshold for Defining Activated Muscle.

Authors:  Masayoshi Takamori; Sumikazu Akiyama; Kazuya Yoshida; Hidefumi Wakashin; Yoshiteru Seo
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 5.  Multinuclear MRI in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Dorota Bartusik-Aebisher; Zuzanna Bober; Jolanta Zalejska-Fiolka; Aleksandra Kawczyk-Krupka; David Aebisher
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.927

6.  Improving the Detection of Cholangiocarcinoma: In vitro MRI-Based Study Using Local Coils and T2 Mapping.

Authors:  Narong Khuntikeo; Attapol Titapun; Nittaya Chamadol; Wuttisak Boonphongsathien; Prakasit Sa-Ngiamwibool; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Christopher A Wadsworth; Shuo Zhang; Evdokia M Kardoulaki; Ian R Young; Richard R A Syms
Journal:  Hepat Med       Date:  2020-03-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.