| Literature DB >> 29882844 |
Yinghui Wu1,2, Wei Chen3, Guo Chen4, Liyu Liu5, Zhubing He6, Ruchuan Liu7.
Abstract
Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have been intensively investigated over the last several years. Unprecedented progress has been made in improving their power conversion efficiency; however, the stability of perovskite materials and devices remains a major obstacle for the future commercialization of PSCs. In this review, recent progress in PSCs is summarized in terms of the hybridization of compositions and device architectures for PSCs, with special attention paid to device stability. A brief history of the development of PSCs is given, and their chemical structures, optoelectronic properties, and the different types of device architectures are discussed. Then, perovskite composition engineering is reviewed in detail, with particular emphasis on the cationic components and their impact on film morphology, the optoelectronic properties, device performance, and stability. In addition, the impact of two-dimensional and/or one-dimensional and nanostructured perovskites on structural and device stability is surveyed. Finally, a future outlook is proposed for potential resolutions to overcome the current issues.Entities:
Keywords: 2 dimensional; Cs-based perovskite; bulk heterojunctions; composite-structured; layered structure; perovskite solar cells; polymer
Year: 2018 PMID: 29882844 PMCID: PMC6027407 DOI: 10.3390/nano8060356
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Introduction of (a) power conversion efficiency of perovskite solar cells over the years [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]; (b) the structure of the hybrid perovskite solar cells.
Figure 2Physical properties of perovskites. (a) Schematic illustration of an ideal perovskite structure. The correlation between the Goldschmidt tolerance factor and the perovskite structure of (b) a typical perovskite and (c) Cs-FA cation perovskite. Reprinted with permission from ref. [41] Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3Energy-level diagram showing the valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB) levels of several typical perovskites [43,44,45,46,47,48].
Figure 4Solar cells can be described by an (a) equivalent circuit; (b) Example of a current density-voltage profile.
Figure 5Structures of (a) inverted (p-i-n) and (b) normal planar structure (n-i-p) perovskite solar cells, (c) mesoporous structured (c) inverted (p-i-n) and (d) normal planar structure (n-i-p) perovskite solar cells. ETL and HTL represent the electron transport layer and hole transport layer, respectively.
Summary of perovskite solar cell performances employing Cs–MA cations. FTO: fluorine-doped tin oxide; ITO: indium oxide; PCBM: phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester; PCE: power conversion efficiency; PEDOT:PSS: poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate; Spiro-OMeTAD: 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis-(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)9,9′-spirobifluorene.
| Device Structure | Perovskite | Year | Ref. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskie/PCBM/Al | Cs0.1MA0.9PbI3 | 10.10 | 1.05 | 0.73 | 7.68 | 2014 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | Cs | / | / | / | / | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | Cs0.1MA0.9PbI3 | 20.97 | 1.10 | 0.74 | 17.08 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.09MA0.91PbI3 | 22.57 | 1.06 | 0.76 | 18.1 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.1MA0.9PbI3 | 19.20 | 0.96 | 0.70 | 13.0 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | (CsBr)0.1 | 22.60 | 0.93 | 0.65 | 13.6 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | (MAPbI3)0.9 | 22.8 | 1.05 | 0.73 | 17.6 | 2016 | [ |
Summary of perovskite solar cell performances employing Cs-FA cations.
| Device Structure | Perovskite | FF (%) | Year | Ref. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | Cs0.1FA0.9PbI3 | 23.5 | 1.06 | 0.66 | 16.5 | 2015 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.2FA0.8PbI3 | 21.5 | 1.01 | 0.7 | 15.69 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mTiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.2FA0.8PbI2.84Br0.16 | 21.9 | 1.07 | 0.74 | 17.35 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/NiO/perovskite/PCBM/PFN-Br/Ag | Cs0.2FA0.8PbI3 | 19.85 | 1.01 | 0.71 | 15.38 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/SnO2/C60-SAM/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.2FA0.8PbI3 | 21.85 | 1.06 | 0.76 | 17.61 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/SnO2/C60-SAM/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.2FA0.8PbI3 & 0.6% Pb(SCN)2 | 22.25 | 1.09 | 0.81 | 19.57 | 2016 | [ |
| ITO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | FA0.83Cs0.17Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 | 18.34 | 1.23 | 0.79 | 17.8 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/SnO2/PCBM/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | FA0.83Cs0.17Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 | 19.4 | 1.19 | 0.78 | 17.9 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | Cs0.15FA0.85PbI3 | 22.85 | 0.91 | 0.69 | 14.46 | 2017 | [ |
| ITO/SnO2/C60/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | FA0.85Cs0.15Pb(I0.95Br0.05)3 | 22.4 | 1.01 | 0.72 | 16.2 | 2016 | [ |
| ITO/TPD/perovskite/C60/Ag | Cs0.15FA0.85PbI3 | 23.36 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 15.18 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | FA0.85Cs0.15PbI3 | 21.50 | 1.08 | 0.75 | 17.3 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/SnO2/C60/perovskite/spiro-OMeTAD/Au | (HC(NH2)2)0.83Cs0.17Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 | 23.0 | 1.06 | 0.75 | 18.3 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.07FA0.93PbI3 | 21.9 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 15.3 | 2018 | [ |
Performance summary of perovskite solar cells employing multiple cations.
| Device Structure | Perovskite | Year | Ref. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | MA-FAPb-Br-I | 25.00 | 1.10 | 0.80 | 22.1 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/SnO2/C60/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | (FA0.83MA0.17)0.95 Cs0.05Pb(I0.9Br0.1)3 | 22.6 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 18.0 | 2016 | [ |
| ITO/NiOx/F6TCNNQ/perovskite/PCBM/Zracc/Ag | Cs-FA-MAPb-Br-I | 23.18 | 1.12 | 0.80 | 20.86 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/SnO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.056FA0.76MA0.15PbI2.42Br0.48 | 22.03 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 19.56 | 2018 | [ |
| ITO/PEN/QD-SnO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.05(MA0.17FA0.83)0.95Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3 | 23.05 | 1.13 | 0.79 | 20.79 | 2018 | [ |
| ITO/SnO2/Perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | FA0.945MA0.025Cs0.03 Pb(I0.975Br0.025)3 | 24.94 | 1.12 | 0.73 | 20.51 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/QD-SnO2/perovskite/PBDBT/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | (CsPbI3)0.04(FAPb I3)0.82(MAPbBr3)0.14 | 22.39 | 1.12 | 0.79 | 19.85 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs-FA-MAPb-Br-I | 21.77 | 1.13 | 0.76 | 18.76 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.06FA0.79MA0.15 Pb(I0.85Br0.15)3 & KI | 23.2 | 1.17 | 0.79 | 21.5 | 2018 | [ |
| ITO/PTAA/perovskite/C60/BCP/Cu | MA0.6FA0.38Cs0.02PbI2.975Br0.025 & 5 mol% MACl | 22.70 | 1.10 | 0.73 | 19.2 | 2017 | [ |
| ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PC61BM/Bphen/Al | FA0.7MA0.2Cs0.1Pb (I5/6Br1/6)3 & Pb(SCN)2 | 18.21 | 1.06 | 0.73 | 16.09 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | (FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05) Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3 | 21.5 | 1.15 | 0.73 | 18.10 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.05(MA0.15FA0.85)0.95 | 21.7 | 1.05 | 0.75 | 17.1 | 2017 | [ |
| ITO/ZnO/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | Cs6(MA0.17FA0.83)94Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3 | 22.5 | 1.12 | 0.73 | 18.6 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/bl-TiO2/Li-mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | (FAPbI3)0.83(MAPbBr3)0.17 | 23.50 | 1.07 | 0.74 | 21.1 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/Li-mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Rb5(Cs5MAFA)0.95Pb(IBr)x | 22.8 | 1.18 | 0.81 | 21.8 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Rb0.05Cs0.05[(FA0.83MA0.17)]0.9 Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3 | 20.65 | 1.47 | 0.72 | 17.02 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | FA0.80MA0.15Rb0.05 PbI2.55Br0.45 | 23.2 | 1.17 | 0.73 | 20.0 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | Rb-MA-FA-Pb-I-Br | 23.24 | 1.12 | 0.72 | 18.80 | 2016 | [ |
Performance summary of one-dimensional (1-D), two-dimensional (2-D), and three-dimensional (3-D) perovskite solar cells.
| Device Sintructure | Perovskite | Year | Ref. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PCBM/Al | CH3NH3PbI3/A10C60 | 19.41 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 13.97 | 2015 | [ |
| FTO/SnO2/PC61BM/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | BA0.05(FA0.83 Cs0.17)0.95Pb(I0.8Br0.2)3 | 22.7 | 1.14 | 0.8 | 20.6 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD /Au | CsPbI3•0.025EDAPbI4 | 14.53 | 1.15 | 0.71 | 11.86 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/bl-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD /Au | MAPbI3/MA3Bi2I9 | 23.03 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 18.97 | 2018 | [ |
| ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Al | FASnI3/PEAI | 24.1 | 0.52 | 0.71 | 9.01 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/TBP/Au | Cs0.04MA0.16FA0.8PbI0.85Br0.15/PZPY | 21.70 | 1.08 | 0.77 | 18.10 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI3/(HOOC(CH2)4 NH3)2PbI4 | 18.84 | 1.02 | 0.75 | 14.6 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/ZrO2/Carbon | CH3NH3PbI3/(HOOC(CH2)4 NH3)2PbI4 | 23.99 | 0.85 | 0.63 | 12.71 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | (MAPbI3)1−x/ | 20.10 | 1.07 | 0.73 | 15.60 | 2015 | [ |
| ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/PCBM/LiF/Ag | [(PEI)2PbI4]x/ | 19.95 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 25.27 | 2015 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | (IC2H4NH3)2 (CH3NH3)n−1PbnI3n+1:CH3NH3PbI3 | 14.88 | 0.83 | 0.69 | 9.03 | 2016 | [ |
| ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | (PEA,FA)SnI3 | 20.07 | 0.47 | 0.74 | 6.98 | 2018 | [ |
Performance summary of graded hybrid perovskite solar cells.
| Device Sintructure | Perovskite | Year | Ref. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PCBM/Rhodamine 101/LiF/Ag | CA2PbI4/MAPbI | 19.29 | 0.92 | 0.77 | 13.86 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI3 (TMA) | 20.10 | 0.99 | 0.65 | 13.00 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI3 (TEA) | 19.60 | 0.99 | 0.67 | 12.89 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/CuSCN/Au | (5AVA)2PbI4/(FAPbI3)0.88(Cs PbBr3)0.12 & HI | 21.93 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 16.75 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.05(FA0.83 MA0.17)0.95Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3 | 22.89 | 1.11 | 0.73 | 18.51 | 2018 | [ |
| ITO/PTAA/perovskite/PCBM/C60/BCP/Cu | MAPbI3/BA | 22.49 | 1.11 | 0.78 | 19.56 | 2018 | [ |
| ITO/PTAA/perovskite/PCBM/C60/BCP/Cu | MAPbI3/BAI | 22.59 | 1.09 | 0.77 | 18.85 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | FAPbI3/MAPbI3 | 20.97 | 1.03 | 0.74 | 16.01 | 2014 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | (FAPbI3)0.85(MAPbBr3)0.15/FAPbBr3− | 23.18 | 1.16 | 0.79 | 21.31 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | Cs0.1FA0.74MA0.13PbI2.48Br0.39/PEIA | 22.73 | 1.14 | 0.76 | 20.08 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 3-D/2-D/0-D CsPbBrI2 | 12.93 | 1.19 | 0.80 | 12.39 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/NiO | MAPbI3/PEAI | 21.8 | 1.17 | 0.78 | 19.89 | 2017 | [ |
Summary of hybrid composite perovskite/material-based solar cells (PSCs).
| Device Structure | Perovskite | Year | Ref. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-Li-TiO2/perovskit/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | Cs0.05(MA0.17FA0.83)0.95 Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3:carbon nanoparticles | 22.10 | 1.16 | 0.72 | 18.30 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/P61BM/perovskit/P3HT/Mo3/Ag | CH3NH3PbI3:PC 61BM | 26.86 | 0.9 | 0.53 | 12.78 | 2015 | [ |
| FTO/SnO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD /Au | (CsPbI3)0.04(FAPbI3) | 22.39 | 1.11 | 0.78 | 19.38 | 2018 | [ |
| ITO/Mixing graphene oxide/perovskite/PCBM/Ag | MAPbI3:Mixing graphene oxide | 20.71 | 0.96 | 0.76 | 15.20 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskit/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | FA0.85 MA0.15 Pb(I0.85 Br0.15)3:reduced graphene oxides | 21.80 | 1.15 | 0.74 | 18.73 | 2016 | [ |
| ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/Ca/PC71BM/Al | CH3NH3PbI3:PC61BM | 20.20 | 0.97 | 0.82 | 16.0 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskit/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI3:4-ABPACl | 21.98 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 15.38 | 2015 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | MAI:(Pb(Ac)2):PCBM | 18.0 | 1.08 | 0.75 | 14.4 | 2015 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI3− | 19.60 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 11.7 | 2013 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | (FAI)0.81(PbI2)0.85 | 23.73 | 1.11 | 0.73 | 20.80 | 2017 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI:PC61BM | 22.5 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 15.4 | 2016 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI:J71 | 22.31 | 1.11 | 0.78 | 19.19 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI:J50 | 22.28 | 1.10 | 0.76 | 18.81 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI:J51 | 22.11 | 1.10 | 0.77 | 18.92 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI:J61 | 22.35 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 18.69 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI:N2200 | 22.27 | 1.10 | 0.77 | 19.07 | 2018 | [ |
| FTO/c-TiO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au | CH3NH3PbI:PMMA | 21.71 | 1.11 | 0.76 | 18.40 | 2018 | [ |