Literature DB >> 29882736

Complications following pediatric cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a multicenter retrospective study.

Brandon G Rocque1, Bonita S Agee1, Eric M Thompson2, Mark Piedra3, Lissa C Baird4, Nathan R Selden4, Stephanie Greene5, Christopher P Deibert6, Todd C Hankinson7, Sean M Lew8, Bermans J Iskandar9, Taryn M Bragg10, David Frim11, Gerald Grant12, Nalin Gupta13, Kurtis I Auguste13, Dimitrios C Nikas14, Michael Vassilyadi15, Carrie R Muh2, Nicholas M Wetjen16, Sandi K Lam17.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE In children, the repair of skull defects arising from decompressive craniectomy presents a unique set of challenges. Single-center studies have identified different risk factors for the common complications of cranioplasty resorption and infection. The goal of the present study was to determine the risk factors for bone resorption and infection after pediatric cranioplasty. METHODS The authors conducted a multicenter retrospective case study that included all patients who underwent cranioplasty to correct a skull defect arising from a decompressive craniectomy at 13 centers between 2000 and 2011 and were less than 19 years old at the time of cranioplasty. Prior systematic review of the literature along with expert opinion guided the selection of variables to be collected. These included: indication for craniectomy; history of abusive head trauma; method of bone storage; method of bone fixation; use of drains; size of bone graft; presence of other implants, including ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt; presence of fluid collections; age at craniectomy; and time between craniectomy and cranioplasty. RESULTS A total of 359 patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients' mean age was 8.4 years, and 51.5% were female. Thirty-eight cases (10.5%) were complicated by infection. In multivariate analysis, presence of a cranial implant (primarily VP shunt) (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.17-4.98), presence of gastrostomy (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.03-5.79), and ventilator dependence (OR 8.45, 95% CI 1.10-65.08) were significant risk factors for cranioplasty infection. No other variable was associated with infection. Of the 240 patients who underwent a cranioplasty with bone graft, 21.7% showed bone resorption significant enough to warrant repeat surgical intervention. The most important predictor of cranioplasty bone resorption was age at the time of cranioplasty. For every month of increased age the risk of bone flap resorption decreased by 1% (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001). Other risk factors for resorption in multivariate models were the use of external ventricular drains and lumbar shunts. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest study of pediatric cranioplasty outcomes performed to date. Analysis included variables found to be significant in previous retrospective reports. Presence of a cranial implant such as VP shunt is the most significant risk factor for cranioplasty infection, whereas younger age at cranioplasty is the dominant risk factor for bone resorption.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CI = confidence interval; EVD = external ventricular drain; OR = odds ratio; VP = ventriculoperitoneal; bone resorption; complication; cranioplasty; infection; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29882736     DOI: 10.3171/2018.3.PEDS17234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  19 in total

1.  Craniocerebral disproportion after decompressive craniectomy in infants: The hidden enemy of cranial repair?

Authors:  Paolo Frassanito; Federico Bianchi; Vito Stifano; Flavia Fraschetti; Luca Massimi; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Massimo Caldarelli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Management and prevention of cranioplasty infections.

Authors:  Paolo Frassanito; Flavia Fraschetti; Federico Bianchi; Francesca Giovannenze; Massimo Caldarelli; Giancarlo Scoppettuolo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  The growth of the neurocranium: literature review and implications in cranial repair.

Authors:  Paolo Frassanito; Federico Bianchi; Giovanni Pennisi; Luca Massimi; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Massimo Caldarelli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Cranioplasty in children: time for a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Paolo Frassanito
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review.

Authors:  Vicente Mirabet; Daniel García; Nuria Yagüe; Luis Roberto Larrea; Cristina Arbona; Carlos Botella
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 6.  [The latest study on biomimetic mineralized collagen-based bone materials for pediatric skull regeneration and repair].

Authors:  Bo Li; Shuo Wang; Yonggang Zhao; Xiumei Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-03-15

7.  Cranioplasties following craniectomies in children-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Vita M Klieverik; Kai J Miller; Kuo Sen Han; Ash Singhal; Michael Vassilyadi; Charles J Touchette; Alexander G Weil; Peter A Woerdeman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  From decompressive craniectomy to cranioplasty and beyond-a pediatric neurosurgery perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Beez; Christopher Munoz-Bendix; Sebastian Alexander Ahmadi; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Kerim Beseoglu
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 9.  Cranioplasty after craniectomy in pediatric patients-a systematic review.

Authors:  Vita M Klieverik; Kai J Miller; Ash Singhal; Kuo Sen Han; Peter A Woerdeman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 10.  Greenstick fracture-hinge decompressive craniotomy in infants: illustrative case and literature review of techniques for decompressive craniotomy without bone removal.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yokota; Tadashi Sugimoto; Mitsuhisa Nishiguchi; Hiroyuki Hashimoto
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.