| Literature DB >> 26198354 |
Papa M Drame1,2,3, Anne Poinsignon4, Célia Dechavanne5,6, Gilles Cottrell7,8, Manon Farce9, Rodolphe Ladekpo10, Achille Massougbodji11,12, Sylvie Cornélie13, David Courtin14,15,16, Florence Migot-Nabias17,18, André Garcia19,20, Franck Remoué21,22.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The estimates of risk of malaria in early childhood are imprecise given the current entomologic and parasitological tools. Thus, the utility of anti-Anopheles salivary gSG6-P1 peptide antibody responses in measuring exposure to Anopheles bites during early infancy has been assessed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26198354 PMCID: PMC4511589 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0800-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1IgG and IgM responses to gSG6-P1 salivary peptide, intensity of Plasmodium falciparum transmission and Anopheles exposure level in the first year of life. Individual IgG (1a) and IgM (1b) responses to the Anopheles gSG6-P1 peptide biomarker are represented for infants in months 3 (white), 6 (light-grey), 9 (dark-grey) and 12 (black box) after their birth. Boxes locate the middle 50% of the data; horizontal lines in the boxes indicate median values; lengths of boxes correspond to the inter-quartile ranges. Horizontal black dotted lines represent the cut-off of IgG (0.204) and IgM (0.288) responder. The intensity of P. falciparum infection (1c) and the entomological risk of malaria (1d) are also represented for the same four age-sampling periods. Vertical lines indicate confidence intervals of the mean values. Statistical significant differences between all age groups (multivariate linear mixed model analysis) are indicated.
Percentages of IgG and IgM responders according to age and the place of birth/residence
| Variables | Groups | Individual Ab responders to gSG6-P1 peptide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage (%) of IgG responders | Percentage (%) of IgM responders | ||
| Age | M3 | 93.98 (125/133) | 41.35 (55/133) |
| M6 | 97.74 (130/133) | 50.37 (67/133) | |
| M9 | 98.96 (131/133) | 56.39 (75/133) | |
| M12 | 98.96 (131/133) | 65.41 (87/133) | |
| Maternity hospitals | Avame | 97.87 (230/235) | 17.02 (40/235) |
| Gare | 93.11 (108/116) | 89.65 (104/116) | |
| Cada | 98.37 (181/184) | 76.63 (141/184) | |
The place of birth/residence was studied by combining infants of all ages (n = 532).
Figure 2Evolution of gSG6-P1-specific IgG and IgM in the maternity hospital of infants’ birth. The evolution of IgG (solid line) and IgM (dotted line) responses to gSG6-P1 Anopheles antigen is represented for infants in Tori Avame (a), Tori Gare (b) and Tori Cada (c). The significance level of the difference of specific Ab level between two successive age-periods is indicated by “*” (“*”, “**” and “***” mean p < 0.05, p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively).
Linear Mixed-Effects (LME) model to study anti-gSG6-P1 response according to age, gender, seasonality, vector control, location and Plasmodium falciparum infection
| Anti-gSG6-P1 IgG response | Anti-gSG6-P1 IgM response | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated coefficient (SE) | P-value | Estimated coefficient (SE) | P-value | |
| Fixed effects | ||||
| Intercept |
|
|
|
|
| Age (months) | ||||
| 3 (n = 133) | – | – | – | – |
| 6 (n = 133) |
|
|
| 0.0117 |
| 9 (n = 133) |
|
|
| 0.0000 |
| 12 (n = 133) |
|
|
| 0.0000 |
| Season | ||||
| Dry season 1 | – | – | – | – |
| Dry season 2 | 0.57 (0.09) | 0.1445 | -0.001 (0.028) | 0.9561 |
| Rain season 1 | 0.57 (0.09) | 0.3689 | -0.040 (0.044) | 0.3590 |
| Rain season 2 | 0.57 (0.09) | 0.7927 | -0.029 (0.030) | 0.3218 |
| Vector control | ||||
| No ITN | – | – | – | – |
| ITN | − |
| −0.023 (0.027) | 0.3904 |
| | ||||
| Not infected | – | – | – | – |
| Infected | 0.016 (0.064) | 0.8084 | 0.089 (0.068) | 0.1943 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Entomological risk of exposure | −0.003 (0.004) | 0.4677 |
|
|
| Random effects | ||||
| Village level | 0.074 (0.045) | – | 0.091 (0.086) | – |
| Individual level | 0.241(0.183) | – | 0.157 (0.202) | – |
The classes of variables with significant p value are highlighted in italic
The intercept is the constant value when all independent variables are zeros (e.g. the value of median Ab response in someone with no risk factors). Random effects of the model were estimated at individual and village levels in the form of standard deviation. The estimated coefficient, its confidence interval and the degree of signification (P-value) are indicated. A positive regression coefficient means that the explanatory variable increases the probability of Ab response to gSG6-P1, while a negative regression coefficient means the contrary.
Figure 3Correlations between specific IgG levels in the mothers’ peripheral blood, umbilical cord blood and blood of M3-infants. Anti-gSG6-P1 IgG individual levels (black points) in the mothers’ peripheral blood (MPB) are correlated to those detected in the infants’ umbilical cord (IUCB; Figure 2a) and in the M3-infants’ blood (Figure 2c). Specific IgG in the IUCB are correlated to those in M3-infant blood (Figure 2b). The black solid line indicates the correlation line. The significance of the linear association between two compared parameters is indicated (Spearman correlation method).