Literature DB >> 29882475

Transverse venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Safety and feasibility.

Jerry Me Koovor1, Gloria V Lopez1, Kalen Riley1, Juan Tejada1.   

Abstract

Purpose Transverse sinus stenosis is commonly seen in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. It is not clear whether it is the cause or the result of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension has been carried out in several prior series. Our goal was to evaluate the clinical and imaging follow-up results of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension that underwent stenting for this condition at our center. Materials and Methods We reviewed the clinical, venographic and follow-up imaging data in patients who underwent elective transverse sinus stenting during the period from 2011 to 2017. Results In total, 18 patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension were identified. The mean lumbar cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure recorded was 408 mmH20. Overall, 16 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent transverse sinus stenting. At venography, the mean pressure gradient across the dominant transverse sinus stenosis was 21 mmHg. The pressure gradient immediately after stenting in all of those measured was negligible. Following stenting, headaches improved in 10 of the 16 cases, with persistent headaches in four patients, one of which had persistent baseline migraines. All cases showed resolution of the papilledema on follow up. Follow-up imaging with computed tomography venography showed that the stents remained widely patent. The follow up in clinic was done for a mean period of 35.5 months. Follow up with computed tomography venography was done for a mean of 10.3 months. Conclusion Venous sinus stenting is a safe and effective procedure. It relieves papilledema in all cases and improves headaches in most cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Headache; idiopathic intracranial hypertension; papilledema; venous sinus stenosis; venous sinus stenting

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29882475      PMCID: PMC6136131          DOI: 10.1177/1971400918782320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiol J        ISSN: 1971-4009


  14 in total

1.  A modeling study of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: etiology and diagnosis.

Authors:  Scott A Stevens; Nimish J Thakore; William D Lakin; Paul L Penar; Bruce I Tranmer
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.448

2.  Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions.

Authors:  R M Ahmed; M Wilkinson; G D Parker; M J Thurtell; J Macdonald; P J McCluskey; R Allan; V Dunne; M Hanlon; B K Owler; G M Halmagyi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Time to re-assess the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Felipe C Albuquerque; Bradley A Gross; Michael R Levitt
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.836

4.  Transient resolution of venous sinus stenosis after high-volume lumbar puncture in a patient with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Thomas J Buell; Daniel M S Raper; I Jonathan Pomeraniec; Dale Ding; Ching-Jen Chen; Davis G Taylor; Kenneth C Liu
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension is not associated with cortical venous occlusion.

Authors:  Michael R Levitt; Felipe C Albuquerque; Andrew F Ducruet; M Yashar S Kalani; Celene B Mulholland; Cameron G McDougall
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 6.  Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Marc J Dinkin; Athos Patsalides
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  S R Satti; L Leishangthem; M I Chaudry
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ross C Puffer; Wessam Mustafa; Giuseppe Lanzino
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 5.836

9.  Stenting of the Lateral Sinus in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension According to the Type of Stenosis.

Authors:  Stéphanie Lenck; Fabrice Vallée; Marc-Antoine Labeyrie; Valérie Touitou; Jean-Pierre Saint-Maurice; Antoine Guillonnet; Audrey Tantot; Isabelle Crassard; Anne-Laure Bernat; Emmanuel Houdart
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Venous sinus stenting for refractory benign intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  J Nicholas P Higgins; Brian K Owler; Claire Cousins; John D Pickard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  6 in total

1.  Endovascular stenting of the superior sagittal sinus to alleviate venous compression caused by a parasagittal meningioma.

Authors:  Pouya Entezami; M Reid Gooch; John Dalfino
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-04-05

2.  Pulsatile Tinnitus Due to Stenosis of the Marginal Sinus: Diagnosis and Endovascular Treatment.

Authors:  J Cortese; M Eliezer; A Guédon; E Houdart
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Safety and efficacy comparison between OACs plus single antiplatelet and dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with cerebral venous sinus stenosis poststenting.

Authors:  Chaobo Bai; Zhiying Chen; Xiaoqin Wu; Roxanne Ilagan; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 4.  A systematic review of surgical treatments of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).

Authors:  Aristotelis Kalyvas; Eleftherios Neromyliotis; Christos Koutsarnakis; Spyridon Komaitis; Evangelos Drosos; Georgios P Skandalakis; Mantha Pantazi; Y Pierre Gobin; George Stranjalis; A Patsalides
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Perioperative mannitol intensive use may avoid the early complication of cerebral venous sinus stenting.

Authors:  Chaobo Bai; Jian Chen; Xiaoqin Wu; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 6.  Molecular, Pathological, Clinical, and Therapeutic Aspects of Perihematomal Edema in Different Stages of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Chao Jiang; Hengtao Guo; Zhiying Zhang; Yali Wang; Simon Liu; Jonathan Lai; Tom J Wang; Shize Li; Jing Zhang; Li Zhu; Peiji Fu; Jiewen Zhang; Jian Wang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 7.310

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.