Literature DB >> 29882455

Women's perceptions of the adoption of personalised risk-based breast cancer screening and primary prevention: a systematic review.

Linda Rainey1, Daniëlle van der Waal1, Yvonne Wengström2,3, Anna Jervaeus2, Mireille J M Broeders1,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Increased knowledge of breast cancer risk factors may enable a paradigm shift from the current age-based mammographic screening programmes to a personalised risk-based approach. This would warrant a significant change in practice, yet the acceptability from a woman's perspective has never been systematically explored. In this systematic review, we inventoried and appraised studies of women's perceptions of risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention to identify factors associated with adopting this new paradigm.
METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase and PsycInfo to identify original articles in English containing perceptions of risk-based breast cancer screening and/or primary prevention of women with an average to above average risk of developing breast cancer. Qualitative data were systematically extracted and referenced against four theoretical models of preventative health behaviour adoption.
RESULTS: When considering the adoption of this novel screening and prevention programme, women carefully review their perceived susceptibility to breast cancer. Their decisions are based on a cost-benefit analysis of adopting lifestyle changes, chemoprevention, or prophylactic surgery, taking into account their perceived competence, individual autonomy, relatedness to others, and personal preference. The role of intent is limited when considering behavioural change.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementing risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention will require a multifactorial approach. The transition from theory to practice can be supported by developing evidence-based shared decision aids and family-oriented (genetic) counselling programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29882455     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1481291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  9 in total

Review 1.  How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research.

Authors:  Victoria G Woof; Anthony Howell; Lorna McWilliams; D Gareth Evans; David P French
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 9.075

2.  Women's perceptions of personalized risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: An international focus group study.

Authors:  Linda Rainey; Anna Jervaeus; Louise S Donnelly; D Gareth Evans; Mattias Hammarström; Per Hall; Yvonne Wengström; Mireille J M Broeders; Daniëlle van der Waal
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  The introduction of risk stratified screening into the NHS breast screening Programme: views from British-Pakistani women.

Authors:  Victoria G Woof; Helen Ruane; David P French; Fiona Ulph; Nadeem Qureshi; Nasaim Khan; D Gareth Evans; Louise S Donnelly
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Women's health behaviour change after receiving breast cancer risk estimates with tailored screening and prevention recommendations.

Authors:  Linda Rainey; Daniëlle van der Waal; Louise S Donnelly; Jake Southworth; David P French; D Gareth Evans; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  A risk scoring system to predict the individual incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jialin Gu; Yan Li; Jialin Yu; Miao Hu; Yi Ji; Lingchang Li; Canhong Hu; Guoli Wei; Jiege Huo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Extending screening intervals for women at low risk of breast cancer: do they find it acceptable?

Authors:  Lorna McWilliams; Victoria G Woof; Louise S Donnelly; Anthony Howell; D Gareth Evans; David P French
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  European women's perceptions of the implementation and organisation of risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Linda Rainey; Daniëlle van der Waal; Anna Jervaeus; Louise S Donnelly; D Gareth Evans; Mattias Hammarström; Per Hall; Yvonne Wengström; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Dutch women's intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers.

Authors:  Linda Rainey; Daniëlle van der Waal; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Development and validation of the MARA scale in Spanish to assess knowledge and perceived risks and barriers relating to breast cancer prevention.

Authors:  Andrea Martínez-Urquijo; Álvaro Postigo; Marcelino Cuesta; María Del Mar Fernández-Álvarez; Rubén Martín-Payo
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.506

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.