Literature DB >> 29881862

Morphology dependent near-field response in atomistic plasmonic nanocavities.

Xing Chen1, Lasse Jensen.   

Abstract

In this work we examine how the atomistic morphologies of plasmonic dimers control the near-field response by using an atomistic electrodynamics model. At large separations, the field enhancement in the junction follows a simple inverse power law as a function of the gap separation, which agrees with classical antenna theory. However, when the separations are smaller than 0.8 nm, the so-called quantum size regime, the field enhancement is screened and thus deviates from the simple power law. Our results show that the threshold distance for the deviation depends on the specific morphology of the junction. The near field in the junction can be localized to an area of less than 1 nm2 in the presence of an atomically sharp tip, but the separation distances leading to a large confinement of near field depend strongly on the specific atomistic configuration. More importantly, the highly confined fields lead to large field gradients particularly in a tip-to-surface junction, which indicates that such a plasmonic structure favors observing strong field gradient effects in near-field spectroscopy. We find that for atomically sharp tips the field gradient becomes significant and depends strongly on the local morphology of a tip. We expect our findings to be crucial for understanding the origin of high-resolution near-field spectroscopy and for manipulating optical cavities through atomic structures in the strongly coupled plasmonic systems.

Year:  2018        PMID: 29881862     DOI: 10.1039/c8nr03029d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  5 in total

1.  Present and Future of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering.

Authors:  Judith Langer; Dorleta Jimenez de Aberasturi; Javier Aizpurua; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; Baptiste Auguié; Jeremy J Baumberg; Guillermo C Bazan; Steven E J Bell; Anja Boisen; Alexandre G Brolo; Jaebum Choo; Dana Cialla-May; Volker Deckert; Laura Fabris; Karen Faulds; F Javier García de Abajo; Royston Goodacre; Duncan Graham; Amanda J Haes; Christy L Haynes; Christian Huck; Tamitake Itoh; Mikael Käll; Janina Kneipp; Nicholas A Kotov; Hua Kuang; Eric C Le Ru; Hiang Kwee Lee; Jian-Feng Li; Xing Yi Ling; Stefan A Maier; Thomas Mayerhöfer; Martin Moskovits; Kei Murakoshi; Jwa-Min Nam; Shuming Nie; Yukihiro Ozaki; Isabel Pastoriza-Santos; Jorge Perez-Juste; Juergen Popp; Annemarie Pucci; Stephanie Reich; Bin Ren; George C Schatz; Timur Shegai; Sebastian Schlücker; Li-Lin Tay; K George Thomas; Zhong-Qun Tian; Richard P Van Duyne; Tuan Vo-Dinh; Yue Wang; Katherine A Willets; Chuanlai Xu; Hongxing Xu; Yikai Xu; Yuko S Yamamoto; Bing Zhao; Luis M Liz-Marzán
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  In silico design of graphene plasmonic hot-spots.

Authors:  Luca Bonatti; Luca Nicoli; Tommaso Giovannini; Chiara Cappelli
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2022-04-18

Review 3.  Progress in Preparation of Sea Urchin-like Micro-/Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ruijing Ma; Liqin Xiang; Xiaopeng Zhao; Jianbo Yin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Do We Really Need Quantum Mechanics to Describe Plasmonic Properties of Metal Nanostructures?

Authors:  Tommaso Giovannini; Luca Bonatti; Piero Lafiosca; Luca Nicoli; Matteo Castagnola; Pablo Grobas Illobre; Stefano Corni; Chiara Cappelli
Journal:  ACS Photonics       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 7.077

5.  Atomic-Scale Structural Fluctuations of a Plasmonic Cavity.

Authors:  Anna Rosławska; Pablo Merino; Abhishek Grewal; Christopher C Leon; Klaus Kuhnke; Klaus Kern
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 11.189

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.