Yangyang Li1,2, Qiaolin Wei1,2, Fei Ma1,2, Xin Li3, Fengyong Liu3, Min Zhou1,2,4. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine & Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, National Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China. 2. Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China. 3. Department of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China. 4. State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentations, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Abstract
Raman spectroscopy, amplified by surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) nanoparticles, can provide an in vivo imaging modality due to its high molecular specificity, high sensitivity, and negligible autofluorescence. The basis, composition, and methodologies developed for SERS nanoparticles are herein described. The research hotspots that are the focus in this paper are tumor imaging-guided theranostics and biosensing. The next breakthrough may be the development of biocompatible SERS nanoparticles and spectroscopic devices for clinical applications.
Raman spectroscopy, amplified by surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) nanoparticles, can provide an in vivo imaging modality due to its high molecular specificity, high sensitivity, and negligible autofluorescence. The basis, composition, and methodologies developed for SERS nanoparticles are herein described. The research hotspots that are the focus in this paper are tumor imaging-guided theranostics and biosensing. The next breakthrough may be the development of biocompatible SERS nanoparticles and spectroscopic devices for clinical applications.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer imaging; Nanoparticles; Raman spectroscopy; SERS; Theranostics
When light contacts matter, the majority of photons are scattered elastically by the Rayleigh effect. However, a small minority of photons undergo a different scattering mechanism (inelastic scattering), where an energy exchange occurs during the interaction between the incident photon and the scattering material. Raman spectroscopy is a vibrational spectroscopy technique that is based on the inelastic scattering of light by the targeted materials and provides a fingerprint of characteristic features. The phenomenon of the Raman effect was first discovered experimentally by an Indian physicist named C.V.Raman in 1928. who was awarded the Noble Prize in 1930. However, the sensitivity of Raman spectroscopy is intrinsically low. Moreover, Raman spectroscopy was not utilized for tracing analysis and surface science due to the nominal number of probe molecules.In 1974 Fleischmann et al. experimentally observed clear, enhanced Raman signals from pyridine molecules attached to a roughened silver electrode. However, they attributed the increased Raman signals to the increase in adsorbed pyridine molecules due to the enlarged surface area of the corrugated surface. In 1977 enhanced Raman signals had been carefully calculated by Van Duyne et al. and they concluded that the anomalously intense Raman signal should be attributed to enhanced Raman scattering efficiency, which was known as surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS).The discovery of the SERS phenomenon greatly stimulated interest in surface-enhanced Raman studies9, 10. As a result, the previously low tracking sensitivity has been improved enormously in surface Raman spectroscopy. Signals from the molecules adsorbed on metal nanostructures can be increased greatly, while the isolated molecules remain unchanged11, 12. Furthermore, SERS can be used to reflect basic information on the targeted molecules with regard to surface orientation, bonding, and confirmation of the adsorbed molecules on the surface. Interface reactions/biological processes also can be detected by SERS14, 15. Therefore, SERS is an excellent technique for the characterization of molecules and amplification of molecular signals from molecules bound to or near plasmonic surfaces. As for the mechanism of surface enhancement, it remains controversial. Generally, there are two accepted physical models, namely the surface-enhanced physical model and the surface-enhanced chemical model17, 18.
SERS nanoparticles
Research on SERS is mainly focused on the fabrication of substrates, which are now divided into two major categories: tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS)19, 20, 21 and the preparation of nanoparticle substrate22, 23, 24. When metal materials are shaped into very small tip morphology, the molecules absorbed induced an enhanced Raman spectroscopy called TERS. However, the development of TERS is only in the early stages. Another research direction is nanoparticle morphology. The shape and surface feature of the nanoparticles are important factors affecting the SERS performance25, 26, 27, 28, 29. Meanwhile, the distance between the nanoparticle substrates and the measured molecules plays a vital role in promoting the Raman signal from the targeted molecules. Moreover, the diverse morphology of nanoparticles may increase the possibility of a particular distance being suitable for SERS30, 31. Currently, the basic shape of SERS nanoparticles includes spherical, rod, star and prismatic, as well as others32, 33. The research direction of SERS is no longer limited to search for appropriate substrates; instead, the development of SERS nanoparticles for medical applications has become the current mainstream direction34, 35, 36.For biomedical applications, integrating the SERS amplification theory into nanoparticles with the properties of in vitro sensing, and further to develop these nanoparticles for in vivo imaging was the logical approach37, 38, 39. However, several factors should be considered, and hurdles had to be overcome before the use of SERS nanoparticles in vivo. Firstly, the selected material must have high SERS enhancement. The three best known SERS materials are silver, gold and copper and have the advantage of being the most inert materials and thus providing the best possibilities for clinical applications43, 44, 45. Previous studies on silver (Fig. 1) and gold47, 48 (Fig. 2) nanocomplexes have yielded numerous uses in biomedical applications. Secondly, the components of SERS nanoparticles should have the sufficient biocompatibility, that is, during the process of nanoparticle synthesis, potentially toxic elements or surfactants should be avoided as possible. Finally, SERS nanoparticles should be encapsulated to ensure that the Raman reporter is isolated from external stimuli when used in vivo, to preserve the unique identifying Raman fingerprint and maintain its detection performance. For instance, gold nanoparticles are often encapsulated into a silica shell or polyethylene glycol (PEG) and bound to bovine serum albumin (BSA) for stability or to protect the SERS probes.
Figure 1
Scheme of carboplatin-loaded, Raman-encoded, chitosan-coated silver nanotriangles as multimodal traceable nanotherapeutic delivery systems and pH reporters inside ovarian cancer cells. Reproduced with permission from ACS article.
Figure 2
Scheme of antibody conjugated, Raman-tagged hollow gold—silver nanospheres for specific targeting and multimodal imaging. Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.
Scheme of carboplatin-loaded, Raman-encoded, chitosan-coated silver nanotriangles as multimodal traceable nanotherapeutic delivery systems and pH reporters inside ovarian cancer cells. Reproduced with permission from ACS article.Scheme of antibody conjugated, Raman-tagged hollow gold—silver nanospheres for specific targeting and multimodal imaging. Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.Generally, the in vivo SERS imaging strategy consists of bonding the SERS nanoparticles with Raman molecule probes attached to the nanoparticulate surface. As discussed above, SERS-active cores should be protected by other shell materials. Some researchers have synthesized Au@Raman probe@SiO2 nanoparticles for SERS applications. Briefly, a certain size of Au colloid was synthesized, mixed with a Raman probe or added in the presence of a coupling agent and then coated with a thinner silica shell (Fig. 3). Polymers possess distinctive advantages such as biocompatibility, biodistribution, and modifiability.
Figure 3
(A) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Au@SiO2 with the Raman probe inside the nanoparticles. (B) TEM image of Au@SiO2 nanoparticles. Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.
(A) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Au@SiO2 with the Raman probe inside the nanoparticles. (B) TEM image of Au@SiO2 nanoparticles. Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.A SERS tag usually consists of a metalSERS nanoparticle core and adsorbed Raman probe molecules on the metal surface (Fig. 4). Subsequently, a modified biocompatible layer encases the metal particle and the Raman probe molecules and the surface can be functionalized further with targeting agents. The core of SERS tags is commonly gold nanoparticles which are considered to be chemically stable and nontoxic. The gold nanoparticles are plasmonically active in the NIR region, which is strongly favored for biomedical applications due to the low autofluorescence from tissues. Raman probe molecules with large Raman cross sections are often the superior choice for preparing SERS tags. Selecting probe molecules with an absorption spectrum that overlaps with the laser line (or the adsorption of SERS nanoparticle core) can lead to enhanced surface resonance Raman scattering.
Figure 4
Design and structure of nanoparticle tags, consisting of a metal nanoparticle core, adsorbed Raman probe molecules on the metal surface (green stars), a biocompatible layer (orange layer), and targeting ligands. Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.
Design and structure of nanoparticle tags, consisting of a metal nanoparticle core, adsorbed Raman probe molecules on the metal surface (green stars), a biocompatible layer (orange layer), and targeting ligands. Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.SERS-active cores can also be modified by polymer materials. One of the most common molecules is polyethylene glycol (PEG). A basic experimental route is carried out as follows: first, Au nanoparticles are modified with Raman probes and then attached with thiol-functionalized PEG that will stabilize the Raman signals in a harsh in vivo environment. The PEG shell can create a site to enhance the nanoparticles and prevent nonspecific interactions. In addition to silica and polymer shells, many researchers are also interested in molecular shells. A molecular shell can be formed with DNA molecules to form a special configuration, such as a dimer mode, forming a gap between or within nanoparticles, and by using dye-labeled DNA sequences, the target on the solution or the substrate can be detected directly. Besides DNA, amino acids, peptides, and other kinds of molecules can be used for molecular shells and have a wide range of applications.
Tumor imaging-guided theranostics with SERS nanoparticles
The ability of nanoparticle-based platforms to gauge different targets simultaneously, sensitively and with multiplex imaging in vivo, is of considerable interest56, 57, 58. Zavaleta et al. have reported that the functionality of multiplex imaging can be obtained in vivo after several Raman molecule probes were injected simultaneously with each molecule possessing an unparalleled spectrum (Fig. 5). The SERS nanoparticles arrive at the targeted site in vivo by one of two ways: they either accumulate in the body by enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR) or the receptor- or antibody-modified nanoparticles ensure the active targeting to particular tissues or tumors61, 62, 63, 64, 65. Previous in vivo studies depended on passive targeting to demonstrate that nanoparticles (>100 nm) are usually taken up by Kupffer cells of the reticuloendothelial system and subsequently accumulate in the liver. Meanwhile, the signal of the nanoparticles in tumors will remain elevated while the concentration of administrated nanoparticles in blood returns to pre-injected levels. The passive targeting mode has been utilized in combination with the development of new instrumentation for SERS imaging in vivo.
Figure 5
(A) Schematic illustration of 10 SERS nanoparticles. The core is a gold nanoparticle and the Raman molecule absorbed on the surface. Subsequently, a silica shell is coated on the surface as a protective layer. (B) The Raman spectra of 10 SERS nanoparticles depicted in (A). (C) The application of 10 different SERS nanoparticles in vivo to evaluate the multiplex imaging functionality. Reproduced with permission from the PNAS article.
(A) Schematic illustration of 10 SERS nanoparticles. The core is a gold nanoparticle and the Raman molecule absorbed on the surface. Subsequently, a silica shell is coated on the surface as a protective layer. (B) The Raman spectra of 10 SERS nanoparticles depicted in (A). (C) The application of 10 different SERS nanoparticles in vivo to evaluate the multiplex imaging functionality. Reproduced with permission from the PNAS article.To determine whether SERS signals can be obtained from PEGylated gold nanoparticles steeped in vivo, Qian et al. have demonstrated that when small doses of SERS nanoparticles were administered to subcutaneous and deep muscular region in small animals, highly resolved SERS signals could be acquired from these regions. The in vivo SERS spectra measured are almost equal to those from in vitro saline samples. The sole distinction is that the absolute intensities are attenuated by 1–2 orders of magnitude when used in vivo. Because of the high signal to noise ratios of the SERS nanoparticles, the penetration depth can achieve about 1–2 cm, which is favorable for in vivo tumor detection or imaging.ScFv antibody-modified gold nanoparticles were administered by intravenous injection to nude mice bearing a human head and neck tumor (Tu686) for in vivo tumor targeting ability studies (Fig. 6). The results showed that the obtained SERS spectra were noticeably different when the near-infrared (785 nm) laser beam was focused on the tumor region or other anatomical locations (e.g., the liver or a leg) 5 h after a SERS nanoparticle injection. More concretely, signal intensities between the targeted and nontargeted nanoparticles at the tumor site were distinguishable. Meanwhile, the SERS signals from the nonspecific liver are non-distinguishable. This study indicates that the ScFv-conjugated gold nanoparticles are effective for EGFR-positive tumor targeting performance in vivo. Time-dependent SERS results further demonstrate that the SERS nanoparticles accumulate in the tumor gradually 4–6 h after administration, and subsequently, the majority of the accumulated nanoparticles remained in the tumor site for more than 24 or 48 h.
Figure 6
(A and B) SERS spectra acquired from the tumor and liver site by using the active targeted (A) and nontargeted (B) SERS nanoparticles. Two nude mice with a human head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (Tu686) xenograft tumor (3-mm diameter) were systemically injected with the ScFv EGFR-modified SERS or PEGylated SERS nanoparticles. The SERS spectra were measured after administration for 5 h. (C) Photographs show a 785 nm laser beam focused on the tumor site or on the anatomical region of liver. In vivo SERS spectra were acquired from the tumor region (red line) and the liver region (blue line) after 785 nm laser excitation. The spectra had already subtracted the background. The Raman probe molecule is malachite green and the Laser excitation power is 20 mW. Reproduced with permission from The NPG article.
(A and B) SERS spectra acquired from the tumor and liver site by using the active targeted (A) and nontargeted (B) SERS nanoparticles. Two nude mice with a human head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (Tu686) xenograft tumor (3-mm diameter) were systemically injected with the ScFv EGFR-modified SERS or PEGylated SERS nanoparticles. The SERS spectra were measured after administration for 5 h. (C) Photographs show a 785 nm laser beam focused on the tumor site or on the anatomical region of liver. In vivo SERS spectra were acquired from the tumor region (red line) and the liver region (blue line) after 785 nm laser excitation. The spectra had already subtracted the background. The Raman probe molecule is malachite green and the Laser excitation power is 20 mW. Reproduced with permission from The NPG article.One of the first examples of in vivo imaging of tumors was reported in 2012, which made use of a gold core/silica shell/Gd-coated nanoparticle that allowed triple modality imaging of brain tumors using SERS, MRI and photoacoustic imaging (Fig. 7). This nanoparticle construct did not use a targeting moiety on its surface, relying on the EPR effect for passive accumulation within the glioblastoma tumor site. It allowed precise detection of the main tumor and microscopic extensions, and the feasibility of in vivo tumor resections based on the SERS signal was demonstrated for the first time. Importantly, it was also shown that no nanoparticles accumulated in the healthy brain, an observation establishing targeting specificity. However, when my group continued this work and tested the same nanoparticles in other extracranial tumor models, the resultant SERS signal was not found to be sufficient to allow robust cancer imaging. The Hi-Mycmouse was systemically administered with the SERS nanoparticles and subsequently, the in-situ Raman imaging of the prostate was carefully studied, which is shown in Fig. 8. After lesion 1 was resected by the Raman-guided method, secondary Raman imaging was performed to remove the tumor section of lesions 2 and 3. During the Raman guided surgical resection procedure of lesions 2 and 3, it was found that these two sections contained invasive carcinoma of squamous and mucous cell differentiation. After the resection procedure 2, a Raman scan was taken as the final step. Residual SERS signal was discovered and lesion 4 was recognized, and biopsy results confirmed it to be invasive adenocarcinoma. As depicted in Fig. 8B, the characteristic band around 950 cm−1 of the SERS nanoparticles was evident in all identified premalignant and malignant prostate lesions, but not in normal prostate tissue.
Figure 7
Raman imaging-guided intraoperative surgery using a gold core/silica shell/Gd-coated nanoparticle. (A and B) The live tumor-bearing mice underwent craniotomy under general anesthesia. Quarters of the tumor site were sequentially resected and Raman imaging was taken after each resection step until the tumor site had been completely removed. After partial resection several minimal foci of Raman signal could be found in the removed section. The Raman color scale is shown in red (from −40 to 0 dB). (C) The histological analysis of these foci indicates that the infiltrative pattern of the tumor, which formed finger-like protrusions into the surrounding brain tissue. The Raman signal of these protrusions was acquired as shown in the Raman microscopy image, indicating that the SERS nanoparticles were a selective presence. The Raman signal is shown in a linear red color scale. Reproduced with permission from The NPG article.
Figure 8
SERS imaging of a prostate neoplasia. (A) SERS image-guided surgical resection procedure of in-situ prostate neoplasia of a Hi-Myc mouse which was injected intravenously with SERS nanoparticles. Raman images are on the top side and photos are of the central location. Raman image-guided surgical resection was performed on lesion 1 (along the dotted line in the left-hand image). Subsequently, Raman imaging was used for the second resection procedure (along the dotted line in the center image). Raman imaging was further taken after the procedure of resection 2 to screen for remaining tumor tissue. A residual lesion 4 was found and biopsied (dotted line in right-hand image). (Bottom) Histopathological examination of H&E-stained sections of the excised tissues 1-4 identified lesion 1 as high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia and lesions 2–4 as advanced prostate cancer. (B) The left Raman spectra of lesions 1–4 and normal prostate tissue 5 adjacent to lesion 1. The arrow indicates the diagnostic 950 cm−1 band of the injected SERS nanoparticles. The right intensity is scaled between 0 and 200 to show the Raman spectrum of normal prostate tissue. Scale bars are 5 mm. Reproduced with permission from the NPG article.
Raman imaging-guided intraoperative surgery using a gold core/silica shell/Gd-coated nanoparticle. (A and B) The live tumor-bearing mice underwent craniotomy under general anesthesia. Quarters of the tumor site were sequentially resected and Raman imaging was taken after each resection step until the tumor site had been completely removed. After partial resection several minimal foci of Raman signal could be found in the removed section. The Raman color scale is shown in red (from −40 to 0 dB). (C) The histological analysis of these foci indicates that the infiltrative pattern of the tumor, which formed finger-like protrusions into the surrounding brain tissue. The Raman signal of these protrusions was acquired as shown in the Raman microscopy image, indicating that the SERS nanoparticles were a selective presence. The Raman signal is shown in a linear red color scale. Reproduced with permission from The NPG article.SERS imaging of a prostate neoplasia. (A) SERS image-guided surgical resection procedure of in-situ prostate neoplasia of a Hi-Mycmouse which was injected intravenously with SERS nanoparticles. Raman images are on the top side and photos are of the central location. Raman image-guided surgical resection was performed on lesion 1 (along the dotted line in the left-hand image). Subsequently, Raman imaging was used for the second resection procedure (along the dotted line in the center image). Raman imaging was further taken after the procedure of resection 2 to screen for remaining tumor tissue. A residual lesion 4 was found and biopsied (dotted line in right-hand image). (Bottom) Histopathological examination of H&E-stained sections of the excised tissues 1-4 identified lesion 1 as high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia and lesions 2–4 as advanced prostate cancer. (B) The left Raman spectra of lesions 1–4 and normal prostate tissue 5 adjacent to lesion 1. The arrow indicates the diagnostic 950 cm−1 band of the injected SERS nanoparticles. The right intensity is scaled between 0 and 200 to show the Raman spectrum of normal prostate tissue. Scale bars are 5 mm. Reproduced with permission from the NPG article.Generally, the large surface-to-volume ratios of nanomaterials allow the combination of multiple diagnostic and therapeutic agents within one system. Integrating SERS nanoparticles with both diagnostic images (SERS imaging) and therapeutic functionality (photothermal, photodynamic and chemotherapy) is an ultimate goal, named a “theranostic” nanoplatform68, 69.Recently, SERS-guided theranostic nanoplatforms based on smart designs of SERS tags for tumor therapy have attracted considerable attention. Zhang et al. functionalized the SERS gold nanorods with the photosensitizer dye protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) for photodynamic therapy (PDT). The PDT/SERS composites combine gold nanorods with DTTC Raman reporters encased by a silica shell which is later functionalized with PEG ligands and PpIX photosensitizers. This study indicated that SERS probes were found to facilitate the PDT ability of PpIX. Jung et al. synthesized a theranostic agent consisting of a 10 nm gold nanosphere modified with pH-responsive ligands and Raman probes molecules attached to the surface (Fig. 9). This composite agent exhibited pH-triggered aggregation leading to favorable Raman imaging performance and externally responsive photothermal efficacy when in a cancerous local environment. Jin et al. developed a SERS theranostic platform consisted of metallic Au@Ag core–shell rodlike nanomaterials with embedded Raman reporters (Fig. 10). The localized surface plasmon resonance of these nanorods can be tuned from UV to NIR region, leading to highly tunable SERS and PT properties. Their study demonstrated that a thin Ag shell cover can be designed as multifunctional NIR theranostic probes that combine enhanced photothermal therapy capability.
Figure 9
Nanoparticle-based probe that can be used for a “turn-on” theranostic agent for simultaneous Raman imaging/diagnosis and photothermal therapy. Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.
Figure 10
Design strategy to fabricate SERS nanoparticles with embedded Raman reporters for bioimaging and photothermal therapy (PTT). On-resonant probes with a thin Ag shell show a moderate SERS performance and maximized photothermal (PT) effect, whereas off-resonant probes with a thick Ag shell show super high SERS performance and minimized PT effect. Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.
Nanoparticle-based probe that can be used for a “turn-on” theranostic agent for simultaneous Raman imaging/diagnosis and photothermal therapy. Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.Design strategy to fabricate SERS nanoparticles with embedded Raman reporters for bioimaging and photothermal therapy (PTT). On-resonant probes with a thin Ag shell show a moderate SERS performance and maximized photothermal (PT) effect, whereas off-resonant probes with a thick Ag shell show super high SERS performance and minimized PT effect. Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.Multifunctional metal-based nanoplatforms have been widely investigated for their potential in bioimaging, diagnostics, and photodynamic (PDT) therapy. Simon et al. reported 3-dimensional (3-D) close-packed nanoassemblies of gold nanoparticles coated with Pluronic block copolymer (F127) polymer (Fig. 11). Methylene blue (MB) molecules, employed as both the optical label and photosensitizing drug, were loaded. The fabricated nanoassemblies offered optical imaging of murinecolon carcinoma cells (C-26) via both Raman and fluorescence imaging collected from MB molecules. Furthermore, the photodynamic therapeutic performance of MB-loaded gold nanoaggregates against C-26 cancer cells was demonstrated.
Figure 11
Scheme for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles and polymer stabilization for bioimaging and photodynamic therapy (PDT). Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.
Scheme for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles and polymer stabilization for bioimaging and photodynamic therapy (PDT). Reproduced with permission from the ACS article.Apart from the PTT- and PDT-functionalized SERS nanoparticles, the application of plasmonic-enhanced Raman imaging and chemotherapeutics delivery is gaining increasing attention (Fig.12). A new theranostic nanoparticle for simultaneously evaluating drug-scattering, cellular imaging and Raman-scattering molecular vibration signals has been reported. This multifunctional nanoparticle provided real-time monitoring of the anticancer drug release process and in vivo biodistribution. The in vivo SERS detection of this system holds great promise for application in image-guided cancer chemotherapy.
Figure 12
Gold Nanostars for theranostics: intracellular and in vivo SERS detection combined with real-time drug delivery using plasmonic-tunable Raman/FTIR imaging. Reproduced with permission from the Elsevier article.
Gold Nanostars for theranostics: intracellular and in vivo SERS detection combined with real-time drug delivery using plasmonic-tunable Raman/FTIR imaging. Reproduced with permission from the Elsevier article.This nanoplatform composed of therapeutic functionalities and SERS imaging provides exciting perspectives for imaging-guided synergistic therapy and beyond in a nanoparticle construct75, 76, 77, 78, 79. One could also overcome the limitations of mono-SERS performance. These smart “theranostic” SERS nanoplatforms will increase the opportunities for clinical applications.
SERS nanoparticles for biosensing
Studies to identify tumor margins or to detect cancer in vivo have been discussed in this review article so far. However, the application of SERS toward the detection of tumor cells or biomarkers has not been described yet. Biomarker detection means identifying molecular indicators of disease in clinical samples, such as blood or urine. Many biomarkers associated with cancer can be identified in very low concentration. Detection methods have been widely developed, including enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA), radioactive immunoassays, Western blot, mass spectrometry (MS), or a combination thereof80, 81, 82. However, the SERS methods possess high sensitivity and can be multiplexed over many samples in addition to having a wide working range, offering the possibility of biomarker detection in whole blood with analyte concentrations spanning several orders of magnitude. Zhou et al. have employed DNA-mediated SERS phenomenon of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) to detect an extensive range of ctDNAs in human blood in vitro, ultrasensitively (Fig. 13). Combining the high-performance of the ctDNA recognition ability of the designed triple-helix molecular switch and RNase HII enzyme-assisted amplification, the DNA-mediated SERS enhancement of SWNTs could achieve detection sensitivity as low as 0.3 fmol/L, which provides the potential feasibility of point-of-care testing in clinical diagnosis.
Figure 13
(A) Construction of SWNT-based SERS assay coupling with RNase HII-assisted amplification for highly sensitive detection of ctDNA in human blood. The enlarged image illustrates T-rich DNA-mediated growth of CuNPs to enhance the SERS signal of SWNTs. (B) Mechanism of RNase HII-assisted THMS-based amplified recognition to produce numerous T-rich ssDNAs. Reproduced with permission from ACS article.
(A) Construction of SWNT-based SERS assay coupling with RNase HII-assisted amplification for highly sensitive detection of ctDNA in human blood. The enlarged image illustrates T-rich DNA-mediated growth of CuNPs to enhance the SERS signal of SWNTs. (B) Mechanism of RNase HII-assisted THMS-based amplified recognition to produce numerous T-rich ssDNAs. Reproduced with permission from ACS article.At present, many patients suffer from diabetes mellitus due to insulin dysfunction. It is well known that insulin regulates glucose metabolism. The commonly used method is to take a small sample of the patient's blood. However, this detection approach is painful. Therefore, the future aim is to make progress toward in vivo detection, with minimally damaging sensing. The Van Duyne group modified a silver film over a nanosphere surface with alkanethiol molecules to form a partition layer to quantitatively detect glucose by SERS. However, this approach needs further characterization, including the optimum number or concentration of alkanethiol molecules, the wavelength and power of the laser, and the appropriate acquisition time.
Conclusions and outlook
SERS nanoparticles have been used as a new form of molecular imaging agents to diagnose cancer or intratumoral heterogeneity, and during the past few years has shown promise in clinical translation. However, current Raman scanners lack the wide field of view and rapid image acquisition speeds, which severely hinders the clinical application of SERS nanoparticles. Nevertheless, efforts are being made to overcome these obstacles. Developing deep tumor detection (or imaging) performance is another aspect of application in oncology for SERS nanoparticles. A Raman endoscope that fits into the instrument channel of a conventional white light endoscope already exists. Therefore, developing deep tissue Raman detectors is highly promising.The above-mentioned discussion focuses on technical problems. Currently, the real bottleneck in the clinical application of SERS nanoparticles is not just the detection technology, but regulatory approval of the nanoparticles themselves, with concerns about biotoxicity in vivo. The particle's safety, pharmacokinetics, clearance properties, and radiation dosimetry will be a chief issue for use in vivo. Toward this end, SERS nanoparticles made of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved materials such as gold and silica have shown good biocompatibility in extensive animal studies, and other types of gold and gold-silica nanoparticles for cancer therapy have already advanced into clinical trials.The increased precision in visualizing the true extent of tumor margins provided by the SERS signal could advance the accuracy with which cancer can be diagnosed or destroyed, thus providing great promise. Increased accuracy means that less tumor tissue is left behind, and more healthy tissue can be spared. This could improve patient outcomes not only during classical open surgeries but also especially in the emerging fields of minimally invasive and robotically assisted procedures.In brief, SERS nanoparticles possess favorable advantages over traditional imaging models, offering much higher sensitivity, nearly perfect signal specificity, and unparalleled multiplexing capabilities. There are driving forces to exploit these features for image-guided tumor therapy and detection. The next breakthrough is likely to be the development of SERS nanoparticles and spectroscopic devices for clinical applications. Moreover, though there still are some difficulties to be solved, SERS nanoparticles will have significant opportunities for clinical translation in the future.
Authors: Ji-Ho Park; Geoffrey von Maltzahn; Luvena L Ong; Andrea Centrone; T Alan Hatton; Erkki Ruoslahti; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Michael J Sailor Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Moritz F Kircher; Adam de la Zerda; Jesse V Jokerst; Cristina L Zavaleta; Paul J Kempen; Erik Mittra; Ken Pitter; Ruimin Huang; Carl Campos; Frezghi Habte; Robert Sinclair; Cameron W Brennan; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Eric C Holland; Sanjiv S Gambhir Journal: Nat Med Date: 2012-04-15 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Stefan Harmsen; Matthew A Bedics; Matthew A Wall; Ruimin Huang; Michael R Detty; Moritz F Kircher Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Ruimin Huang; Stefan Harmsen; Jason M Samii; Hazem Karabeber; Kenneth L Pitter; Eric C Holland; Moritz F Kircher Journal: Theranostics Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Wei Zhang; Fangjun Lin; Yan Liu; Han Zhang; Timothy A Gilbertson; Anhong Zhou Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Elizabeth M Higbee-Dempsey; Ahmad Amirshaghaghi; Matthew J Case; Mathilde Bouché; Johoon Kim; David P Cormode; Andrew Tsourkas Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Bohdan Andreiuk; Fay Nicolson; Louise M Clark; Sajanlal R Panikkanvalappil; Mohammad Rashidian; Stefan Harmsen; Moritz F Kircher Journal: Nanotheranostics Date: 2022-01-01