| Literature DB >> 29881519 |
Tahereh Molkara1,2, Farideh Akhlaghi3, Mohammad Arash Ramezani4, Roshanak Salari5, Veda Vakili6, Mohammad Kamalinejad7, Mohammad Reza Fayyazi Bordbar8, Ahmad Ghorbani9, Malihe Motavasselian10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Globally, female sexual dysfunction is a serious concern based on negative family and social consequences, high side effects of medications and lack of effective treatment. Thus, the evaluation of treatment approach for this problem is an important priority for healthcare systems. Sexual life and its related disorders are considered the main aspects of a healthy lifestyle in traditional Persian medicine (TPM).Entities:
Keywords: Daucus Carota; Herbal Medicine; Libido; Phytotherapy; Sex Education; Traditional Persian Medicine
Year: 2018 PMID: 29881519 PMCID: PMC5984011 DOI: 10.19082/6577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Electron Physician ISSN: 2008-5842
Figure 1CONSORT Flow Diagram of the study
Comparison of Demographic characteristic among study groups
| Variables | Group; n (%) | Total; n (%) | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Food production | Education plus Food production | ||||
| Education | Illiterate | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.1) | 0.763 (Kruskal-Wallis) |
| Primary school | 4 (12.5) | 2 (6.5) | 3 (9.4) | 9 (9.5) | ||
| Junior high school | 3 (9.4) | 4 (12.9) | 3 (9.4) | 10 (10.5) | ||
| High school diploma | 14 (43.8) | 12 (38.7) | 19 (59.4) | 45 (47.4) | ||
| Associate Degree | 8 (25) | 8 (25.8) | 4 (12.5) | 20 (21.1) | ||
| Bachelor and above | 3 (9.4) | 4 (12.9) | 3 (9.4) | 10 (10.5) | ||
| Total | 32 (100) | 31 (100) | 32 (100) | 95 (100) | ||
| Occupational status | Unemployed | 2 (6.9) | 3 (10.3) | 1 (3.3) | 6 (6.8) | 0.888 (Mont Carlo Chi square) |
| Employed | 3 (10.3) | 4 (13.8) | 4 (13.3) | 11 (12.5) | ||
| Student | 2 (6.9) | 3 (10.3) | 1 (3.3) | 6 (6.8) | ||
| Housewife | 20 (69) | 15 (51.7) | 21 (70) | 56 (63.6) | ||
| Self-employed | 2 (6.9) | 4 (13.8) | 3 (10) | 9 (10.2) | ||
| Total | 29 (100) | 29 (100) | 30 (100) | 88 (100) | ||
| Place of residence | Urban | 31 (100) | 31 (96.9) | 31 (100) | 94 (98.9) | 1.000 (Mont Carlo Chi square) |
| Rural | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.1) | ||
| Total | 31 (100) | 32 (100) | 31 (100) | 95 (100) | ||
| Housing status | Landlord | 8 (27.6) | 20 (64.5) | 16 (51.6) | 44 (48.4) | 0.015 (Chi square) |
| Tenant | 21 (72.4) | 11 (35.5) | 15 (48.4) | 47 (51.6) | ||
| Total | 29 (100) | 31 (100) | 31 (100) | 91 (100) | ||
| Alcohol consumption | Spouse | 4 (12.5) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (10) | 7 (7.4) | 0.174 (Mont Carlo Chi square) |
| Neither | 28 (87.5) | 32 (100) | 27 (90) | 87 (92.6) | ||
| Total | 32 (100) | 32 (100) | 30 (100) | 94 (100) | ||
| Smoking | Spouse | 7 (21.9) | 7 (21.9) | 7 (21.9) | 21 (21.9) | 1.000 (Mont Carlo Chi square) |
| Both | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.1) | 1 (1.0) | ||
| Neither | 25 (78.1) | 25 (78.1) | 24 (75) | 74 (77.1) | ||
| Total | 32 (100) | 32 (100) | 32 (100) | 96 (100) | ||
| Marital status | Women | 1 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (6.5) | 3 (3.2) | 0.609 (Mont Carlo Chi square) |
| Spouse | 1 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.2) | 2 (2.1) | ||
| Both | 1 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.2) | 2 (2.1) | ||
| Neither | 28 (90.3) | 32 (100) | 27 (87.1) | 87 (92.6) | ||
| Total | 31 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 31 (100) | 94 (100) | ||
Comparison of Mean values of sexual function domains among study groups
| Domains of sexual function | Stages | Education plus food product | Food product | Education | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desire | Pre-intervention | 2.9±0.8 | 2.6±0.8 | 2.8±0.8 | 0.313 |
| After four weeks | 3.4±0.8 | 3.2±0.8 | 3.4±0.7 | 0.327 | |
| After eight weeks | 4.4±0.4 | 4.1±0.6 | 3.9±0.6 | 0.002 | |
| Mean paired difference of desire | Pre-intervention and four week after treatment | 0.5±0.7 | 0.6±0.8 | 0.5±0.8 | 0.98 |
| Four and eight weeks difference | 1±0.9 | 1±0.8 | 0.5±0.9 | 0.19 | |
| Eight and Pre-intervention | 1.6±0.7 | 1.6±0.9 | 1.1±0.8 | 0.024 | |
| Arousal | Pre-intervention | 3±0.8 | 2.9±0.8 | 3.4±1 | 0.007 |
| After four weeks | 3.6±0.8 | 3.7±0.6 | 3.8±0.9 | 0.757 | |
| After eight weeks | 4.7±0.6 | 4.5±0.7 | 4.3±0.8 | 0.213 | |
| Mean paired difference of arousal | Pre-intervention and four week after treatment | 0.7±0.8 | 0.8±0.8 | 0.4±0.8 | 0.15 |
| Four and eight weeks | 1.1±1 | 0.8±0.6 | 0.5±0.9 | 0.123 | |
| Eight and Pre-intervention | 1.7±1 | 1.7±1 | 0.9±1 | 0.002 | |
| Orgasm | Pre-intervention | 2.8±0.8 | 3.2±1.1 | 3.2±0.9 | 0.087 |
| After four weeks | 3.7±0.9 | 3.8±1 | 3.6±1.1 | 0.902 | |
| After eight weeks | 5±0.6 | 4.6±1 | 4.3±0.9 | 0.004 | |
| Mean paired difference of orgasm | Pre-intervention and four week after treatment | 0.9±1 | 0.6±1.1 | 0.4±1 | 0.11 |
| Four and eight weeks difference | 1.3±1 | 0.8±0.8 | 0.7±1.2 | 0.023 | |
| Eight and Pre-intervention | 2.2±0.9 | 1.4±1 | 1.1±0.9 | <0.001 | |
| Lubrication | Pre-intervention | 3.7±0.7 | 3.8±0.9 | 3.8±1 | 0.794 |
| After four weeks | 4.3±0.9 | 4.6±0.8 | 4.2±0.9 | 0.172 | |
| After eight weeks | 5.3±0.5 | 5.2±0.6 | 4.6±0.9 | 0.002 | |
| Mean paired difference of lubrication | Pre-intervention and four week after treatment | 0.6±1 | 0.8±1 | 0.4±1 | 0.24 |
| Four and eight weeks difference | 1±0.8 | 0.7±0.6 | 0.4±0.7 | 0.006 | |
| Eight and Pre-intervention | 1.6±0.8 | 1.0±0.8 | 0.8±1.1 | 0.207 | |
| Satisfaction | Pre-intervention | 3.5±0.9 | 3.7±1 | 4±1.1 | 0.204 |
| After four weeks | 4.3±0.9 | 4.4±1 | 4.1±1 | 0.616 | |
| After eight weeks | 5.2±0.5 | 5±0.8 | 4.9±0.8 | 0.202 | |
| Mean paired difference of satisfaction | Pre-intervention and four week after treatment | 0.8±.1.1 | 0.7±0.8 | 1±0.9 | 0.004 |
| Four and eight weeks | 0.9±0.9 | 0.7±0.8 | 0.8±1.1 | 0.504 | |
| Eight and Pre-intervention | 1.7±1 | 1.3±1 | 0.9±1.3 | 0.017 | |
| Pain | Pre-intervention | 3.7±1.2 | 4±1.2 | 4±1.1 | 0.419 |
| After four weeks | 4.3±1.1 | 4.4±1.2 | 4.2±1 | 0.741 | |
| After eight weeks | 5.3±0.7 | 4.9±1 | 4.2±1.1 | <0.001 | |
| Mean paired difference of pain | Pre-intervention and four week after treatment | 0.6±1.2 | 0.4±1.2 | 0.1±1 | 0.252 |
| Four and eight weeks | 1±1.2 | 0.5±0.9 | 1±1.1 | 0.008 | |
| Eight and Pre-intervention | 1.6±1.2 | 0.9±1.3 | 0.2±1.2 | <0.001 | |
| Total sexual function | Pre-intervention | 19.5±3.4 | 20±3.8 | 21.2±3.8 | 0.151 |
| After four weeks | 23.7±4 | 23.9±3.9 | 23.3±3.3 | 0.77 | |
| After eight weeks | 29.8±2.2 | 28.6±2.9 | 26.2±3.4 | <0.001 | |
| Mean paired difference of total sexual function | Pre-intervention and four week after treatment | 4.3±3.5 | 3.9±3.3 | 2.1±3.3 | 0.026 |
| Four and eight weeks | 4.6±4 | 4.6±2.9 | 2.8±3 | <0.001 | |
| Eight and Pre-intervention | 10.6±3.8 | 8.6±3.5 | 5±3.6 | <0.001 |
Data is presented as Mean±SD