UNLABELLED: Many studies have implicated elevated oxygen consumption (VO2) associated with aerobic exercise as contributing to oxidative stress. Only a few studies have investigated nonaerobic exercise and its relation to pro-oxidant and antioxidant activities. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare biomarkers of oxidative stress: lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and total antioxidants in blood after exhaustive aerobic (AE) and nonaerobic isometric exercise (IE). METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 12 subjects who performed a maximum AE and IE test and were analyzed for thiobarbituric acid (TBARS), carbonyls, lipid hydroperoxides (LH), and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC). RESULTS: VO2 increased 14-fold with AE compared with 2-fold with IE. Protein carbonyls increased 67% (P < 0.05) pre- to immediately and 1 h post-AE, and 12% pre- to immediately post-IE and returned to baseline 1 h post-IE. TBARS did not increase significantly with either treatment. LH increased 36% above rest during IE compared with 24% during AE (P < 0.05). ORAC increased 25% (P < 0.05) pre- to post-AE, compared with 9% (P < 0.05) pre- to post-IE. CONCLUSION: There was evidence of oxidative stress after both exhaustive aerobic and isometric exercise. Lipid hydroperoxides, protein carbonyls, and total antioxidants increased after both IE and AE. Due to the different metabolic demands of aerobic and isometric exercise, we can rule out a mass action effect of VO2 as the sole mechanism for exercise-induced oxidative stress.
UNLABELLED: Many studies have implicated elevated oxygen consumption (VO2) associated with aerobic exercise as contributing to oxidative stress. Only a few studies have investigated nonaerobic exercise and its relation to pro-oxidant and antioxidant activities. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare biomarkers of oxidative stress: lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and total antioxidants in blood after exhaustive aerobic (AE) and nonaerobic isometric exercise (IE). METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 12 subjects who performed a maximum AE and IE test and were analyzed for thiobarbituric acid (TBARS), carbonyls, lipid hydroperoxides (LH), and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC). RESULTS:VO2 increased 14-fold with AE compared with 2-fold with IE. Protein carbonyls increased 67% (P < 0.05) pre- to immediately and 1 h post-AE, and 12% pre- to immediately post-IE and returned to baseline 1 h post-IE. TBARS did not increase significantly with either treatment. LH increased 36% above rest during IE compared with 24% during AE (P < 0.05). ORAC increased 25% (P < 0.05) pre- to post-AE, compared with 9% (P < 0.05) pre- to post-IE. CONCLUSION: There was evidence of oxidative stress after both exhaustive aerobic and isometric exercise. Lipid hydroperoxides, protein carbonyls, and total antioxidants increased after both IE and AE. Due to the different metabolic demands of aerobic and isometric exercise, we can rule out a mass action effect of VO2 as the sole mechanism for exercise-induced oxidative stress.
Authors: Gareth W Davison; Tony Ashton; Jane McEneny; Ian S Young; Bruce Davies; Damian M Bailey Journal: J Physiol Biochem Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 4.158
Authors: C Berzosa; E M Gómez-Trullén; E Piedrafita; I Cebrián; E Martínez-Ballarín; F J Miana-Mena; L Fuentes-Broto; J J García Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: J Morillas-Ruiz; P Zafrilla; M Almar; M J Cuevas; F J López; P Abellán; J A Villegas; J González-Gallego Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2005-08-31 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Fulvio Lauretani; Richard D Semba; Stefania Bandinelli; Margaret Dayhoff-Brannigan; Vittoria Giacomini; Anna Maria Corsi; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Sara Sechi; Filippo Fiore; Francesca Chiavolelli; Corrado Dimauro; Anna Nudda; Raffaella Cocco Journal: Can J Vet Res Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 1.310
Authors: A H Goldfarb; R S Garten; P D M Chee; C Cho; G V Reeves; D B Hollander; C Thomas; K S Aboudehen; M Francois; R R Kraemer Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2008-07-26 Impact factor: 3.078