| Literature DB >> 29881427 |
Nanis G Allam1, Ehab Mostafa M Ali2, Samya Shabanna1, Elsayed Abd-Elrahman1.
Abstract
Cadmium (Cd) is a highly toxic heavy metal, wide occupational and an environmental pollutant, affecting human health. Probiotics especially lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have the capacity to bind, remove and to decrease tissue cadmium levels. The objective was to evaluate the potency of Cd binding capacity, antioxidative properties of probiotic bacteria against cadmium in-vitro and its probable detoxification effect against Cd-induced toxicity in mice. To asses this objective, resistance against cadmium and antioxidative properties (via DPPH radical scavenging and inhibition of lipid peroxidation) were estimated for thirteen probiotic bacteria. Streptococcus thermophilus was selected among investigated bacteria as it had the highest MIC against cadmium and remarkable antioxidant activities for treatment of Cd toxicity in Swiss albino mice by preventive and therapeutic protocols. Blood cadmium levels, reduced glutathione (GSH), malondialdehyde (MDA) and histopathological changes in the liver of mice were estimated at 6, 24 and 48 h post to acute Cd exposure (oral dose with 50 mg/kg body weight). On exposure to Cd a significant increase in blood Cd, MDA and reducing in GSH levels were observed. S. thermophilus offered a significant protective effect against Cd toxicity by decreasing the cadmium levels in blood and attenuation alterations in the levels of GSH and MDA and improved hepatic histopathological changes caused by Cd toxicity. These results indicated the protective action of S. thermophilus against acute cadmium toxicity as well as their beneficial health effects and suggested its use as a safe and efficacious nutritional dietary supplement to reduce cadmium toxicity.Entities:
Keywords: Cd toxicity; Detoxification; Lactic acid bacteria; Probiotics; Streptococcus thermophiles
Year: 2018 PMID: 29881427 PMCID: PMC5985187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Figure 1The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, mM) of cadmium against the tested probiotic bacteria.
DPPH radical scavenging activity of probiotic bacteria
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 85.56 ±0.25A a | 86.06±0.35A a | 83.43± 0.25B a | 85.63±0.20A a |
|
| 86.63± 0.20 A b | 87.3±0.35 B bd | 82.31± 0.40 C b | 88.8±0.75 D b |
|
| 88.93±0.55 A c | 87.13±0.45 B b | 90.41±0.27 C ci | 90.21± 0.37 C fi |
|
| 90.36±0.25 A d | 87.63±0.45B bd | 87.50±0.40B d | 86.73±0.35C d |
|
| 86.01±1.01A ab | 83.51±0.22B d | 79.36±0.28C e | 82.46±0.32D e |
|
| 89.8± 0.27A d | 87.30±0.16B b | 89.93±0.25A ij | 89.76±0.15A cf |
|
| 84.41±0.22A e | 88.65± 0.32B c | 90.67±0.15C cj | 89.76±0.20D f |
|
| 82.66±0.25A f | 84.41±1.45B e | 84.45±0.23B f | 84.36±0.25B g |
|
| 87.58±0.37A g | 89.31±0.18B f | 88.43±0.27C g | 87.41±0.18A h |
|
| 84.50±0.25A e | 84.90±0.26B e | 89.37±0.29C h | 84.12± 0.14A g |
|
| 90.55±0.22A d | 87.61± 0.26B bd | 90.15±0.32A j | 90.63±0.23A i |
|
| 83.34±0.21A h | 88.41±0.22B c | 89.55±0.21C hij | 84.20±0.36D g |
|
| 89.11±0.31A c | 87.53±0.23B bd | 86.71±0.28C k | 87.96±0.35B h |
All values are expressed as mean of three replica ± standard deviation. Different capital letters indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05 within each row comparisons, different small letters indicate statistically differences at p < 0.05 within the same column comparisons
Lipid peroxidation inhibition ability of probiotic bacteria
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
| 50.16±0.87a |
|
| 70.35±1.21b |
|
| 61.80±1.40c |
|
| 78.52±0.56d |
|
| 65.72±1.07e |
|
| 72.53±1.27f |
|
| 75.33±0.83g |
|
| 70.53±0.74b |
|
| 73.28±1.10f |
|
| 71.56±0.27bf |
|
| 79.32±0.72d |
|
| 75.12±0.93g |
|
| 70.17±0.80b |
All values are expressed as mean of three replica ± standard deviation. Different small letters indicate statistically differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 2BTransmission electron micrographs of S. thermophilus with addition of cadmium, Particles of cadmium were clearly visible on the surface of the bacterial cell
Figure 2ATransmission electron micrographs of S. thermophilus without addition of cadmium (control).
Effects of S. thermophilus on concentrations of Cd in blood of mice
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 h | 24 h | 48 h | |
| -ve control | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| +ve control (Cd) | 64.00±1.15 A e | 28.70±0.26 B c | 11.76±0.51C c |
|
| |||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cd + SM | 57.17±1.25A c | 32.20±1.24B c | 11.80±0.36C c |
|
| 22.70±1.45A a | 10.83±0.41B a | 3.43±0.25C a |
|
| |||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cd + SM | 63.36±1.33A e | 28.03±1.51B c | 11.67±0.90C c |
|
| 39.30±1.20A d | 17.46±1.23B e | 6.13±0.45C e |
All values are expressed as mean of three replica ± standard deviation. Different capital letters indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05 within each row comparisons, different small letters indicate statistically differences at p < 0.05 within the same column comparisons.
Effects of S. thermophilus on cadmium-induced alterations of the activities of GSH and MDA levels in the livers of mice
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| -ve control | 126.40±2.94A d | 123.00±4.00A b | 123.00±4.03A d | 13.26±0.63A b | 12.98±0.29A b | 13.39±0.38A b | |
| +ve control (Cd) | 351.33± 5.50A c | 290.67±5.03B e | 211.33±6.65C c | 3.64±0.16A e | 5.62±0.30B e | 8.57±0.39 C c | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 111.50±1.80A b | 117.00±3.00A b | 114.00±6.24A b | 14.22±0.31A b | 14.31±0.34A b | 14.38±0.26A b | |
| Cd + SM | 348.66±5.13A c | 278.66±4.04B c | 205.00±3.60C c | 3.74±0.12A c | 5.77±0.25B c | 8.35±0.23C c | |
|
| 242.00±4.20A a | 193.00± 4.15B a | 148.66±2.51C a | 6.64±0.24A a | 8.95± 0.20B a | 11.03±0.18C a | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 129.66±4.27A d | 126.66±3.38A f | 126.6±4.04A d | 12.93±0.25A b | 13.32±0.28 A b | 12.51±0.11A b | |
| Cd + SM | 351.66±4.16A c | 295.67±3.51B e | 207.66±3.05C c | 3.69±0.17A e | 5.81±0.05 B e | 8.56±0.45C c | |
|
| 272.33±5.03A e | 212.60±4.08B d | 176.66±4.04C e | 6.033±0.13A d | 8.32±0.16 B d | 10.34±0.10C d | |
Values are mean ± SD values with ten mice in each group .different capital letters indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05 within each row comparisons, different small letters indicate statistically differences at p < 0.05 within the same column comparisons. T: therapy group; P: prevention group; LAB: S.thermophilus
Figure 3APhotomicrograph of liver of mice (H&E, 400×) from -ve control group showing the normal hepatic histological structure
Figure 3BPhotomicrograph of liver of mice (H&E, 400×) from + ve control (Cd) group showing cytoplasmic vacuolization and necrosis of hepatocytes
Figure 3CPhotomicrograph of liver of mice (H&E, 400×) from S.thermophilus + Cd prevention group showing No necrosis and reduction of cytoplasmic vacuolization.