Literature DB >> 29881034

Stochastic Curtailment of Questionnaires for Three-Level Classification: Shortening the CES-D for Assessing Low, Moderate, and High Risk of Depression.

Niels Smits1, Matthew D Finkelman2, Henk Kelderman3.   

Abstract

In clinical assessment, efficient screeners are needed to ensure low respondent burden. In this article, Stochastic Curtailment (SC), a method for efficient computerized testing for classification into two classes for observable outcomes, was extended to three classes. In a post hoc simulation study using the item scores on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) of a large sample, three versions of SC, SC via Empirical Proportions (SC-EP), SC via Simple Ordinal Regression (SC-SOR), and SC via Multiple Ordinal Regression (SC-MOR) were compared at both respondent burden and classification accuracy. All methods were applied under the regular item order of the CES-D and under an ordering that was optimal in terms of the predictive power of the items. Under the regular item ordering, the three methods were equally accurate, but SC-SOR and SC-MOR needed less items. Under the optimal ordering, additional gains in efficiency were found, but SC-MOR suffered from capitalization on chance substantially. It was concluded that SC-SOR is an efficient and accurate method for clinical screening. Strengths and weaknesses of the methods are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical assessment; computerized classification testing; stochastic curtailment

Year:  2015        PMID: 29881034      PMCID: PMC5978527          DOI: 10.1177/0146621615592294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  14 in total

1.  The assessment of anxiety states by rating.

Authors:  M HAMILTON
Journal:  Br J Med Psychol       Date:  1959

2.  On the consistency of individual classification using short scales.

Authors:  Wilco H M Emons; Klaas Sijtsma; Rob R Meijer
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-03

3.  Applying item response theory and computer adaptive testing: the challenges for health outcomes assessment.

Authors:  Peter M Fayers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Item response theory and clinical measurement.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Niels G Waller
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 18.561

5.  Curtailment: a method to reduce the length of self-report questionnaires while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Marjolein Fokkema; Niels Smits; Matthew D Finkelman; Henk Kelderman; Pim Cuijpers
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Variable length testing using the ordinal regression model.

Authors:  Niels Smits; Matthew D Finkelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Assessing the performance of a new depression screener for primary care (PC-SAD).

Authors:  William H Rogers; Ira B Wilson; Kathleen M Bungay; Diane J Cynn; David A Adler
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Current developments and future directions in computerized personality assessment.

Authors:  J N Butcher; L S Keller; S F Bacon
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1985-12

9.  The partial questionnaire design for case-control studies.

Authors:  S Wacholder; R J Carroll; D Pee; M H Gail
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Mar 15-Apr 15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Depression in adults with Fabry disease: a common and under-diagnosed problem.

Authors:  A L Cole; P J Lee; D A Hughes; P B Deegan; S Waldek; R H Lachmann
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 4.982

View more
  1 in total

1.  New Perspectives in the Adaptive Assessment of Depression: The ATS-PD Version of the QuEDS.

Authors:  Andrea Spoto; Francesca Serra; Ivan Donadello; Umberto Granziol; Giulio Vidotto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.