Literature DB >> 17402814

On the consistency of individual classification using short scales.

Wilco H M Emons1, Klaas Sijtsma, Rob R Meijer.   

Abstract

Short tests containing at most 15 items are used in clinical and health psychology, medicine, and psychiatry for making decisions about patients. Because short tests have large measurement error, the authors ask whether they are reliable enough for classifying patients into a treatment and a nontreatment group. For a given certainty level, proportions of correct classifications were computed for varying test length, cut-scores, item scoring, and choices of item parameters. Short tests were found to classify at most 50% of a group consistently. Results were much better for tests containing 20 or 40 items. Small differences were found between dichotomous and polytomous (5 ordered scores) items. It is recommended that short tests for high-stakes decision making be used in combination with other information so as to increase reliability and classification consistency. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17402814     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  25 in total

1.  Confirmatory factor structure of anxiety and depression: evidence of item variance across childhood.

Authors:  Khrista R Boylan; Jessie L Miller; Tracy Vaillancourt; Peter Szatmari
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Stochastic Curtailment of Questionnaires for Three-Level Classification: Shortening the CES-D for Assessing Low, Moderate, and High Risk of Depression.

Authors:  Niels Smits; Matthew D Finkelman; Henk Kelderman
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-06-29

3.  An IRT Modeling Approach for Assessing Item and Person Discrimination in Binary Personality Responses.

Authors:  Pere J Ferrando
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-01-04

4.  Development and initial validation of a short three-dimensional inventory of character strengths.

Authors:  Wenjie Duan; He Bu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory in Individual Change Assessment.

Authors:  Ruslan Jabrayilov; Wilco H M Emons; Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-09-24

6.  The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?

Authors:  Rob Eisinga; Manfred te Grotenhuis; Ben Pelzer
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study.

Authors:  Caroleen W Quach; Michelle M Langer; Ronald C Chen; David Thissen; Deborah S Usinger; Marc A Emerson; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Hooking-Up, Religiosity, and Sexting Among College Students.

Authors:  Michael Hall; Ronald D Williams; M Allison Ford; Erin Murphy Cromeans; Randall J Bergman
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2020-02

9.  On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha.

Authors:  Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Estimating classification consistency of screening measures and quantifying the impact of measurement bias.

Authors:  Oscar Gonzalez; A R Georgeson; William E Pelham; Rachel T Fouladi
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2021-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.