BACKGROUND: Many healthcare organizations have developed processes for supporting the emotional needs of patients and their families after medical errors or adverse events. However, the clinicians involved in such events may become "second victims" and frequently experience emotional harm that impacts their personal and professional lives. Many "second victims," particularly physicians, do not receive adequate support by their organizations. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was assembled to create a clinician peer support program (PSP) at a large academic medical center including both adult and pediatric hospitals. A curriculum was developed to train clinicians to provide support to their peers based on research of clinician response to adverse events, utilization of various support resources, and clinician resiliency and ways to enhance natural resilience. Between April 2014 and January 2017, 165 individuals were referred to the program including 68 (41.2%) residents, 17 (10.3%) fellows, 70 (42.4%) faculty members, 6 (3.6%) nurse practitioners/physician assistants, and 4 (2.4%) certified registered nurse anesthetists. An average of 4.8 individuals were referred per month (range = 0-12). Of the 165 clinicians referred, 17 (10.3%) declined follow-up from the program. Individuals receiving support had a median of two interactions (range = 1-10). Among those receiving support from the clinician PSP, 16 (10.8%) required referral to a higher level of support. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the multiple steps necessary to create a successful PSP focused on physicians and midlevel providers. There is an unmet need to provide support to this group of healthcare providers after medical errors and adverse events.
BACKGROUND: Many healthcare organizations have developed processes for supporting the emotional needs of patients and their families after medical errors or adverse events. However, the clinicians involved in such events may become "second victims" and frequently experience emotional harm that impacts their personal and professional lives. Many "second victims," particularly physicians, do not receive adequate support by their organizations. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was assembled to create a clinician peer support program (PSP) at a large academic medical center including both adult and pediatric hospitals. A curriculum was developed to train clinicians to provide support to their peers based on research of clinician response to adverse events, utilization of various support resources, and clinician resiliency and ways to enhance natural resilience. Between April 2014 and January 2017, 165 individuals were referred to the program including 68 (41.2%) residents, 17 (10.3%) fellows, 70 (42.4%) faculty members, 6 (3.6%) nurse practitioners/physician assistants, and 4 (2.4%) certified registered nurse anesthetists. An average of 4.8 individuals were referred per month (range = 0-12). Of the 165 clinicians referred, 17 (10.3%) declined follow-up from the program. Individuals receiving support had a median of two interactions (range = 1-10). Among those receiving support from the clinician PSP, 16 (10.8%) required referral to a higher level of support. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the multiple steps necessary to create a successful PSP focused on physicians and midlevel providers. There is an unmet need to provide support to this group of healthcare providers after medical errors and adverse events.
Authors: Susan D Scott; Laura E Hirschinger; Karen R Cox; Myra McCoig; Kristin Hahn-Cover; Kerri M Epperly; Eileen C Phillips; Leslie W Hall Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2010-05
Authors: Amy D Waterman; Jane Garbutt; Erik Hazel; William Claiborne Dunagan; Wendy Levinson; Victoria J Fraser; Thomas H Gallagher Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2007-08
Authors: Gordon Schiff; Paula Griswold; Bonnie R Ellis; Ann Louise Puopolo; Namara Brede; Harry Reyes Nieva; Frank Federico; Nicholas Leydon; Judy Ling; Deborah Wachenheim; Lucian L Leape; Madeleine Biondolillo Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2014-02
Authors: Colin P West; Mashele M Huschka; Paul J Novotny; Jeff A Sloan; Joseph C Kolars; Thomas M Habermann; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-09-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David C Classen; Roger Resar; Frances Griffin; Frank Federico; Terri Frankel; Nancy Kimmel; John C Whittington; Allan Frankel; Andrew Seger; Brent C James Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Ahmad Zulfahmi Mohd Kamaruzaman; Mohd Ismail Ibrahim; Ariffin Marzuki Mokhtar; Maizun Mohd Zain; Saiful Nazri Satiman; Najib Majdi Yaacob Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Robyn E Finney; Vanessa E Torbenson; Kirsten A Riggan; Amy L Weaver; Margaret E Long; Megan A Allyse; Enid Y Rivera-Chiauzzi Journal: J Nurs Manag Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 4.680
Authors: Jeehee Pyo; Eun Young Choi; Won Lee; Seung Gyeong Jang; Young Kwon Park; Minsu Ock; Sang Il Lee Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Ahmad Zulfahmi Mohd Kamaruzaman; Mohd Ismail Ibrahim; Ariffin Marzuki Mokhtar; Maizun Mohd Zain; Saiful Nazri Satiman; Najib Majdi Yaacob Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Isolde Martina Busch; Francesca Moretti; Irene Campagna; Roberto Benoni; Stefano Tardivo; Albert W Wu; Michela Rimondini Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 3.390