Literature DB >> 2987797

Comparison of genomic fragment and clone sequences within a long interspersed repeated sequence of the mouse genome.

D L Vizard, J Yarsa.   

Abstract

The 393bp nucleotide sequence of a HindIII genomic fragment mapping within the major long interspersed repeated sequence family (MIF-1, Bam, L1) of mouse is reported and compared to clone sequences of the same region of this repeated sequence. The consensus of the clone sequences significantly differs from the genomic fragment sequence by additions and deletions that are inconsistent with the physical and biochemical properties of the genomic fragment. While alternative explanations could account for some of these differences, several aspects of the experimental results imply that cloning artifacts contribute to the discrepancies. Despite the differences between the clone and genomic fragment sequences, the biologically interesting features previously noted in clone sequences (promoter-like signals and an open reading frame) are conserved in the genomic fragment sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2987797      PMCID: PMC341009          DOI: 10.1093/nar/13.2.473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  14 in total

1.  A mouse dispersed repeat sequence showing remarkable similarities to the long terminal repeats of retroviruses.

Authors:  S D Brown
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  A straight LINE story.

Authors:  J Rogers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Nov 10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Homology between the KpnI primate and BamH1 (M1F-1) rodent families of long interspersed repeated sequences.

Authors:  M F Singer; R E Thayer; G Grimaldi; M I Lerman; T G Fanning
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1983-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Insertion sequences and tandem repetitions as sources of variation in a dispersed repeat family.

Authors:  S D Brown; M Piechaczyk
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Statistical characterization of nucleic acid sequence functional domains.

Authors:  T F Smith; M S Waterman; J R Sadler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1983-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages.

Authors:  A M Maxam; W Gilbert
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Pyrimidine-specific chemical reactions useful for DNA sequencing.

Authors:  C M Rubin; C W Schmid
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-10-24       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A large interspersed repeat found in mouse DNA contains a long open reading frame that evolves as if it encodes a protein.

Authors:  S L Martin; C F Voliva; F H Burton; M H Edgell; C A Hutchison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Left-handed DNA. Cloning, characterization, and instability of inserts containing different lengths of (dC-dG) in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Kłysik; S M Stirdivant; R D Wells
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Isolation of transforming DNA by cosmid rescue.

Authors:  T Lund; F G Grosveld; R A Flavell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Multiple mechanisms generate extrachromosomal circular DNA in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  S W Stanfield; D R Helinski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Fine structure of the human hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene.

Authors:  P I Patel; P E Framson; C T Caskey; A C Chinault
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  A defective non-LTR retrotransposon is dispersed throughout the genome of the silkworm, Bombyx mori.

Authors:  T Ogura; K Okano; K Tsuchida; N Miyajima; H Tanaka; N Takada; S Izumi; S Tomino; H Maekawa
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  RglB facilitated cloning of highly methylated eukaryotic DNA: the human L1 transposon, plant DNA, and DNA methylated in vitro with human DNA methyltransferase.

Authors:  D M Woodcock; P J Crowther; W P Diver; M Graham; C Bateman; D J Baker; S S Smith
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Rat LINE1: the origin and evolution of a family of long interspersed middle repetitive DNA elements.

Authors:  M B Soares; E Schon; A Efstratiadis
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.395

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.