Boondarika Nambooppha1, Kornravee Photichai1, Kanreuthai Wongsawan1, Phongsakorn Chuammitri1,2. 1. Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand. 2. Excellent Center in Veterinary Biosciences (ECVB), Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Public Health, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.
Abstract
Chicken heterophils generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) molecules to defend against invading pathogens. The present study examined effects of quercetin on chicken heterophils. Heterophils were stimulated with PBS, 50 µM quercetin (QH), PMA or Escherichia coli (EC) and the resulting intracellular ROS molecules were determined. Flow cytometry results showed that cells stimulated with QH, PMA and EC had a higher ROS production. Increases in intracellular ROS molecules were identified in all treatment groups by fluorescence microscopy. Determination of the ability of quercetin to manipulate mRNA expression of ROS subunits was assessed using real-time RT-PCR. Quercetin and other stimulants up-regulated the majority of genes involved in ROS production: CYBB (NOX2), NCF1 (p47phox), NCF2 (p67phox), NOX1 and RAC2. The antioxidant property of QH was explored by measuring mRNA expression of CAT and SOD1. The data indicate increased levels of CAT with all treatments; however, only QH attenuated the expression of the SOD1 gene. To further investigate the effects of ROS-driven inflammation or cell death, IL6, CASP8 and MCL1 genes were preferentially tested. The inflammatory gene (IL6) was profoundly down-regulated in the QH- and PMA-treated groups while EC induced a strikingly high IL6 expression level. Investigation of the known apoptotic (CASP8) and anti-apoptotic (MCL1) genes found down-regulation of CASP8 in the QH- and PMA-treated groups which were contradicted to the MCL1 gene. In conclusion, quercetin can enhance ROS production by regulating the expression of genes involved in ROS production as well as in subsequent processes.
Chicken heterophils generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) molecules to defend against invading pathogens. The present study examined effects of quercetin on chicken heterophils. Heterophils were stimulated with PBS, 50 µM quercetin (QH), PMA or Escherichia coli (EC) and the resulting intracellular ROS molecules were determined. Flow cytometry results showed that cells stimulated with QH, PMA and EC had a higher ROS production. Increases in intracellular ROS molecules were identified in all treatment groups by fluorescence microscopy. Determination of the ability of quercetin to manipulate mRNA expression of ROS subunits was assessed using real-time RT-PCR. Quercetin and other stimulants up-regulated the majority of genes involved in ROS production: CYBB (NOX2), NCF1 (p47phox), NCF2 (p67phox), NOX1 and RAC2. The antioxidant property of QH was explored by measuring mRNA expression of CAT and SOD1. The data indicate increased levels of CAT with all treatments; however, only QH attenuated the expression of the SOD1 gene. To further investigate the effects of ROS-driven inflammation or cell death, IL6, CASP8 and MCL1 genes were preferentially tested. The inflammatory gene (IL6) was profoundly down-regulated in the QH- and PMA-treated groups while EC induced a strikingly high IL6 expression level. Investigation of the known apoptotic (CASP8) and anti-apoptotic (MCL1) genes found down-regulation of CASP8 in the QH- and PMA-treated groups which were contradicted to the MCL1 gene. In conclusion, quercetin can enhance ROS production by regulating the expression of genes involved in ROS production as well as in subsequent processes.
Entities:
Keywords:
chicken; gene expression; heterophil; quercetin; reactive oxygen species
Killing of pathogens in phagosomes by chicken heterophils is mediated by enzymatic granules
harbored within that structure along with reactive oxygen species (ROS). In this regard, these
cell types utilize the formation of intermediate oxygen (ROS) during the process of oxidative
burst, such as superoxide (O2•-), hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2), hydroxyl radicals (•OH) and hypochlorous acid
(HOCl) [28]. Chicken heterophils exploit their ability
to generate ROS by themselves; however, the amount generated is limited compared with the
mammalian counterpart, neutrophils [5, 33]. The lack of functional myeloperoxidase (MPO) genes in
the chicken genome prevents MPO production, a vital type of granule which contributes to the
formation of HOCl from H2O2 to destroy bacteria [5, 33].A group of multi-subunit enzymes named “the NOX family” or “NADPH oxidases” is the major
source of ROS molecules in phagocytes, including chicken heterophils [28, 33, 48]. NOX protein subunits are composed primarily of
p22, gp91,
p40, p47 and
p67. These subunits interact with the small GTPase Rac1 or
Rac2 to form competent protein complexes [16, 28, 43]. The proper
stimuli, such as PMA, LPS or viable bacteria, allow the assembling of protein subunits found
in the NOX family and aid in ROS generation [22].
Accumulating evidence indicates that ROS initiates key intracellular signals that dictate
cellular responses to a variety of effector functions such as phagocytosis and extracellular
traps (ETs) in neutrophils and heterophils [9, 25, 36, 47]. The downstream signaling pathways of ROS in
heterophils are believed to mediate via protein kinase C (PKC), p38 MAP kinase, NF-κB, AP-1
and p53 [29, 45]. The subsequent events induce the expression of genes required in overall cellular
functions in heterophils [3, 22, 41]. Intracellular antioxidants
such as glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), vitamin E,
and vitamin C, are always functioning within the cells. These antioxidants help control the
balance of free radicals in the body. When ROS production level increases in cells, the
antioxidants awake and help stop the signal transduction induced by ROS molecules [44]. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), one of
potent ROS molecules, will be dismutated by the action of catalase to produce harmless
H2O and O2 molecules.It has been proposed that the endogenous oxidant and anti-oxidant activities can be
controlled by the action of some dietary flavonoids [23, 46]. Flavonoids, one of the most
extensively studied plant compounds, are ubiquitous in foods including various types of
vegetables, fruits, seeds, grains, and beverages including wine. Biological activities of
flavonoids have been extensively reviewed in the literature, resulting ultimately in a
proposed role in anti-oxidation [4, 18]. Of the flavonoids, quercetin is categorized within the
flavonol group with myricetin and kaempherol [12, 18, 51]. Several
lines of evidence indicate that quercetin possesses anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant,
antibacterial, antiviral, anti-hypertensive, anti-proliferative properties as well as other
properties [4, 18]. Quercetin is also known to have beneficial roles in ROS scavenging [4]. In poultry, quercetin and its derivatives have been used
to promote growth as well as to reduce heat stress in chickens [20, 37].Although studies of quercetin in poultry production have been conducted, understanding of
some aspects of chicken immunology remains very limited. In a previous study, we demonstrated
the in vitro effects of quercetin on heterophil oxidative burst [36], but details of how intracellular ROS molecules of
quercetin-treated heterophils can be manipulated is incompletely determined at the molecular
level. The ROS gene expression patterns of quercetin in modulating ROS production in
heterophils have not yet been fully elucidated. To further understanding of the
immunomodulatory action of quercetin, this study investigated how quercetin modulates
expression of NADPH oxidase (NOX) subunit genes, including CYBB
(gp91), NCF1
(p47), NCF2
(p67), NOX1 and RAC2, in
heterophils. We also determined the genes involved in anti-oxidants (CAT and
SOD1). In addition, we investigated gene expression of
CASP8, IL6 and MCL1 resulting from the
ROS process including cell death and the inflammatory process.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A., included quercetin hydrate
(QH), Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS), Histopaque, Escherichia coliLPSO111: B4, Fluoroshield mounting medium with DAPI, and Trypan blue. Phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate (PMA) was obtained from Calbiochem, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, U.S.A. Cell
culture media RPMI 1640, Fetal bovine serum (FBS), fluorescent probe H2DCF-DA,
and RNAlater were purchased from Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Waltham, MA, U.S.A.
Laboratory animals
Pathogen-free broiler chicks aged from 3 to 7 days (Gallus domesticus),
n=20 chicks in each of 3 independent experiments were obtained from a
local hatchery (Betagro Northern Agro Industries Ltd., Chiang Mai, Thailand). No
statistical calculation was used to predetermine the appropriate sample size; rather,
sample sizes were selected based on experience with variation within the immune system.
The chicks were euthanized in order to collect heterophils from bone marrow. These animal
experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (FVM-ACUC) Ref. No.
S7/2557.
Chicken heterophil isolation from bone marrow
Femurs and tibias were dissected, cleaned, and rinsed with sterile HBSS. Bone marrow from
the bones was repeatedly flushed with HBSS supplemented with 1% FBS using a 21G needle
attached to a 3-ml syringe until the solution came out clean [36]. The cell suspension culture was overlaid on a
discontinuous gradient using Histopaque 1.077/1.119 as previously reported [10]. Cell viability was checked with 0.4% Trypan blue
and the number of cells was adjusted to 1 × 106 cells per ml.
The approximate proportion of viable cells was over 95% and the purity of the cell
population, based on cytospin, was over 90%.
Preparation of quercetin hydrate
Quercetin hydrate (QH) powder was dissolved in 95% ethanol to make a 5 mM stock solution.
Batches of freshly prepared working solution (50 µM, the optimal
concentration of dose-dependent quercetin as determined in a preliminary study) were
diluted with HBSS, wrapped with foil, and stored at room temperature until used.
Escherichia coli (E. coli) propagation
Fresh live Escherichia coli (EC) was prepared using the colony picking
method and propagated in Luria-Bertani broth (LB broth, Caisson Laboratories, North Logan,
UT, U.S.A.) at 37°C and 120 rpm in a shaking incubator until the log phase was reached.
The bacterial number was adjusted to approximately 108 cfu/ml
prior to use in the experiments.
Measurement of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) by flow cytometry
To examine intracellular ROS generation, 1 × 105 heterophils were seeded into
duplicate 96-well flat tissue culture plates. The cells were stimulated with PBS, 50
µM QH, 100 nM PMA, or 1 × 106 cfu EC for 30
min (41°C, 5% CO2). Following incubation, 10 µM
H2DCF-DA was added to each well to stain the intracellular
H2O2 [7, 8]. H2DCF-DA readily diffuses into cells,
where it is oxidized to the highly fluorescent 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) [2]. Cells were incubated in the dark for another 5 min,
then washed with cold PBS, and sample acquisition (10,000 events) was performed on
ROS-containing cells using a CyAnTM ADP Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea,
CA, U.S.A.).
Fluorescence imaging of ROS-containing cells
Heterophils (2.5 × 104 cells) were seeded onto 15 mm diameter circular glass
coverslips coated with 0.001% poly-L-lysine and placed onto 24-well plates. The plates
were incubated for 15 min at room temperature (RT) to allow cell adhesion [38]. Heterophils were stimulated with either PBS
(serving as a control), quercetin (50 µM), PMA (100 nM),
or LPS from E. coli (100 ng) for 30 min (41°C, 5%
CO2). Then 10 µM H2DCF-DA was added and cells
were incubated for an additional 15 min in the dark [32]. Coverslips were then carefully rinsed with cold PBS (3 times) and fixed
with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 25 min at RT. After fixing, cell nuclei were
counterstained with DAPI prior to visualization and image capture with an Axio Scope A1
Fluorescence Microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, U.S.A.) [6, 38]. The average percentage of
cells double stained with both DCF and DAPI was determined manually in 3 random fields
(100 cells per field) by three well-trained observers using blinded technique [49].
ROS gene expression profiles in chicken heterophils by real-time RT-PCR
To explore the effects of quercetin on ROS gene expression, heterophils (1 ×
106 cells) were seeded into duplicate 24-well plates. Cells were stimulated
with either quercetin (50 µM), PMA (100 nM), or EC (1 ×
107 cfu), or were left untreated (PBS). Plates were incubated at 41°C, 5%
CO2 for 1 hr. After incubation, samples from each well were combined to
achieve a cell density of 2 × 106, then RNAlater® solution was added
to preserve the total RNA [34]. RNA extraction was
performed using a NucleoSpin RNA kit (Macherey-Nagel, Bethlehem, PA, U.S.A.) following the
manufacturer’s instructions. RNA yields and concentrations were measured using a DU 730
nanoVette UV/Vis Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter). Two microgram (2
µg) of total RNA were used as a starter for cDNA synthesis using a Tetro
cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline, Taunton, MA, U.S.A.) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions.One hundred nanogram (100 ng) samples of cDNA from chicken heterophils
were quantitatively analyzed for the mRNA transcripts of CYBB
(gp91 or NOX2), NCF1
(p47), NCF2
(p67), NOX1, CAT,
SOD1, RAC2, IL6,
CASP8, MCL1 and GAPDH (as reference
gene) with real-time RT-PCR (qPCR) using a SensiFAST SYBR Hi-ROX Kit (Bioline) following
the protocol described by the manufacturer and using an ABI Prism 7300 real-time PCR
(Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The genes used in this study were selected
based on data mining of KEGG pathways (entry no. gga04145). The information regarding
primer pairs used in this study is provided in Suppl. Table S1. The sequences of primers
were designed by Primer3plus and primer synthesis was performed by MacroGen, South Korea.
After completion of running of the qPCR cycles, dissociation curves were analyzed to
confirm that the PCR product obtained by qPCR included the correct products. Expecting a
single curve at high temperature (Tm) was validated (Suppl. Fig. S1). The
specificity of qPCR on specified genes was confirmed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis
(Suppl. Fig. S1). Analysis of relative gene expression was calculated from the
Ct of the gene of interest (target) and
GAPDH. The expression levels (fold difference) were reported using the
2−ΔΔt method [31].
Data analysis
The data from all three experiments were combined and analyzed for outliers using robust
regression and outlier removal (ROUT) methods. The normality test was done using the
D’Agostino-Pearson omnibus test prior to performing statistical analysis of each
experiment. Statistical analyses were performed using either one-way ANOVA or the
Kruskal-Wallis Test. Results of statistical analyses were considered significant in all
experiments when P<0.05. Multiple comparison of each pair was done
using the Tukey-Kramer Honest Significant Difference test (HSD). Results are reported as
mean plus standard error (SE) or median value. Gene expression profiling of individual
data points is presented in the form of heat maps and unsupervised hierarchical clustering
by an average linkage method with Pearson correlation [15] generated by Genesis 1.7.6 [42].
Samples of selected genes from differential expression data were created and analysis of
networks of genes involved in the ROS processes using CytoScape with a GeneMANIA plugin
was conducted [35].
RESULTS
ROS mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs) increased with quercetin treatment
To determine the effects of quercetin on chicken heterophils in ROS generation, we
fluorescently stained cells with H2DCF-DA after stimulation with various
stimulants including PBS, quercetin (QH), PMA, and live bacteria (E.
coli). Analysis of positive ROS-containing cells by flow cytometry showed a
significant difference between the various treatments (Fig. 1). For quercetin, PMA and E. coli groups, there was a higher
average mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) compared with the PBS group
(P=0.005, Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1.
ROS generation in heterophil stimulated with quercetin and other stimulants by flow
cytometry. (A) Representative offset histograms showing mean fluorescence intensity
(MFI) values of ROS-positive cells from each treatment (PBS, quercetin (QH), PMA
& Escherichia coli, EC). The height of histograms correlates to
% of max. (B) Inclusive scatter plots generated from normalized MFIs to PBS to
reduce inter-experimental variability. Each data point corresponds to an individual
chick (n=12 each treatment). Data are the medians of two separate
experiments, Kruskal-Wallis Test, **P<0.01.
ROS generation in heterophil stimulated with quercetin and other stimulants by flow
cytometry. (A) Representative offset histograms showing mean fluorescence intensity
(MFI) values of ROS-positive cells from each treatment (PBS, quercetin (QH), PMA
& Escherichia coli, EC). The height of histograms correlates to
% of max. (B) Inclusive scatter plots generated from normalized MFIs to PBS to
reduce inter-experimental variability. Each data point corresponds to an individual
chick (n=12 each treatment). Data are the medians of two separate
experiments, Kruskal-Wallis Test, **P<0.01.
Fluorescence microscopy showed a significant increase in H2DCF-DA positive
staining cells with quercetin, PMA and LPS treatments
To visualize the intracellular ROS molecules in heterophils, we fluorescently labeled ROS
and its derivatives with a specific fluorescent dye (H2DCF-DA). The ROS
molecules generated by heterophils with PBS, quercetin, PMA or lipopolysaccharides (LPS)
stimulations were clearly identifiable (Fig.
2A). Stimulated heterophils showed different percentages of ROS molecule staining
(P<0.0001, Fig. 2B).
Quercetin and other stimulants (PMA and LPS) had higher percentages of positive staining
cells with DCF. The percentages of ROS-positive cells in the PBS, quercetin, PMA, and LPS
groups were 69.05 ± 1.58, 84.32 ± 2.83, 84.40 ± 1.83 and 87.36 ± 2.99, respectively (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2.
Characteristics of ROS-containing heterophils visualized by fluorescence
microscope. (A) Representative set of fluorescence micrographs of
quercetin-stimulated heterophils depicting intracellular stained ROS molecules (DCF)
counter-stained with DAPI to indicate cell nuclei. The images were captured at 400 ×
magnification after a 45-min stimulation period; scale bar=10 µm.
(B) Bar graphs represent percentage of DCF positive cells. Results are inclusive of
three separate experiments. Data is represented as mean ± SE
(n=13−15 each treatment), one-way ANOVA,
***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.
Characteristics of ROS-containing heterophils visualized by fluorescence
microscope. (A) Representative set of fluorescence micrographs of
quercetin-stimulated heterophils depicting intracellular stained ROS molecules (DCF)
counter-stained with DAPI to indicate cell nuclei. The images were captured at 400 ×
magnification after a 45-min stimulation period; scale bar=10 µm.
(B) Bar graphs represent percentage of DCF positive cells. Results are inclusive of
three separate experiments. Data is represented as mean ± SE
(n=13−15 each treatment), one-way ANOVA,
***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.
Quercetin up-regulated ROS subunit genes
Validation of primers used in real-time PCRs in this study to detect the expression of
genes involved in ROS and downstream processes is reported in Suppl. Fig. S1. The
real-time PCRs also produced specific PCR products and dissociation curves (melting
curves) as depicted in Suppl. Fig. S1.Gene expression in QH-stimulated heterophils overall was significantly more up-regulated
compared with PBS, especially in ROS subunit genes (CYBB,
NCF1, NCF2, NOX1 and
RAC2) (Fig. 3A). Genes involved in anti-oxidation were found to have increased expression, e.g.,
CAT, whereas other important anti-oxidant genes, e.g.,
SOD1, exhibited decreased expression (Fig. 3B). Quercetin mitigated both pro-inflammatory gene
(IL6) and apoptotic (CASP8) gene expression, while
increasing expression of an anti-apoptotic (MCL1) gene (Fig. 3B).
Fig. 3.
Real-time RT-PCR analyses of chicken heterophil genes involved in ROS generation
and biologically important downstream genes. (A) Bar graphs showing relative
CYBB, NCF1, NCF2,
NOX1 and RAC2 expression levels after
normalization to GAPDH expression in PBS, quercetin (QH), PMA, and
E. coli (EC) groups. (B) Relative CAT,
SOD1, IL6, CASP8 and
MCL1 expression levels of different treatment groups. The results
are inclusive of three separate experiments. Data is represented as mean ± SE
(n=6−8 each treatment), one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test,
*P<0.05, **P<0.01,
***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.
Real-time RT-PCR analyses of chicken heterophil genes involved in ROS generation
and biologically important downstream genes. (A) Bar graphs showing relative
CYBB, NCF1, NCF2,
NOX1 and RAC2 expression levels after
normalization to GAPDH expression in PBS, quercetin (QH), PMA, and
E. coli (EC) groups. (B) Relative CAT,
SOD1, IL6, CASP8 and
MCL1 expression levels of different treatment groups. The results
are inclusive of three separate experiments. Data is represented as mean ± SE
(n=6−8 each treatment), one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test,
*P<0.05, **P<0.01,
***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.The expression levels of ROS-related genes in E. coli and PMA-stimulated
heterophils were also similar to that of quercetin (Fig. 3). The expression of anti-oxidant genes
(CAT and SOD1) was also increased in the PMA and
E. coli groups. In contrast, SOD1 gene expression in
quercetin was slightly reduced. The level of gene expression in downstream ROS processes
were also altered. The expression of a gene in the inflammatory process
(IL6) was reduced in quercetin and PMA, whereas the expression of this
gene in E. coli was elevated. The expressions of CASP8
and MCL1, which are involved in cell death, were in opposite directions.
The CASP8 gene, which is involved in extrinsic cell apoptosis, was
decreased in QH- and PMA-stimulated cells, except for E. coli
stimulation. The anti-apoptotic gene MCL1 showed increased expression in
all treatments compared with PBS (Fig. 3B). The
heat map created by log transformation of the real-time PCR data summarizes the expression
of all genes in the study classified by stimulant (Fig. 4A). Overall gene expression in quercetin, PMA, and E. coli was
increased in CAT, CYBB, NCF1,
NCF2, NOX1, MCL1 and
RAC2 (Fig.
4A, red). For CASP8, IL6 and
SOD1, an overall reduction in expression in quercetin and PMA was found
(green).
Fig. 4.
(A) Unsupervised clustering analysis (Pearson correlation, average linkage method)
of gene expression in chicken heterophil ROS generation. Heat map was generated by a
log transformation of 2-ΔΔCt values and is presented as
individual data points. Columns represent specific ROS subunits, antioxidants, and
downstream genes and the rows represent individual samples in the PBS, quercetin,
PMA, and E. coli groups (n=4 per group).
Expression values ranged from −3 to +3. Red indicates increased expression, green
indicates decreased expression, and black indicates no change in expression.
Expression levels are according to the color scale of the log2 values.
(B) GeneMANIA Cytoscape interaction network of known gene co-expression, physical
interactions, and genes involved in the ROS pathway. Yellow nodes represent query
gene lists. Additional genes are predicted to be involved in the network (gray
nodes).
(A) Unsupervised clustering analysis (Pearson correlation, average linkage method)
of gene expression in chicken heterophil ROS generation. Heat map was generated by a
log transformation of 2-ΔΔCt values and is presented as
individual data points. Columns represent specific ROS subunits, antioxidants, and
downstream genes and the rows represent individual samples in the PBS, quercetin,
PMA, and E. coli groups (n=4 per group).
Expression values ranged from −3 to +3. Red indicates increased expression, green
indicates decreased expression, and black indicates no change in expression.
Expression levels are according to the color scale of the log2 values.
(B) GeneMANIA Cytoscape interaction network of known gene co-expression, physical
interactions, and genes involved in the ROS pathway. Yellow nodes represent query
gene lists. Additional genes are predicted to be involved in the network (gray
nodes).Data on gene expression levels, both up- and down-regulation, were used to analyze the
network of relationships using Cytoscape with GeneMANIA plug-ins. The results revealed
evidence of a relationship among query genes (CYBB,
NCF1, NCF2, NOX1,
RAC2, CAT, SOD1, IL6, CASP8 and
MCL1) and genes in the public dataset functional association networks.
Prediction of known gene co-expression and physical interaction in the ROS pathway with
query genes (yellow nodes) can be defined by additional ROS genes (gray nodes) that are
related to individual query genes (Fig. 4B). It
is worth noting that there are a number of genes associated with the ROS network, e.g.,
NOXO1, NOXA1, CYBA and
SOD3 (Fig. 4B). In addition,
there are some genes that indirectly present in the network, including
IL6, CASP8 and MCL1, but these genes
are expressed together by the genes NCF2, RAC2 and
SOD1, which are already in network relationships (Fig. 4B).
DISCUSSION
Studies of the effect of quercetin on chicken heterophil effector functions suggest that
this substance can manipulate reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in
vitro [36]. Information regarding the use
of quercetin in promoting functions and gene expression in poultry is very limited,
especially in heterophils. Representative information in reports that provides a perspective
for comparing similarities and differences are mainly derived from animal species other than
chickens. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in which quercetin was
applied to chicken heterophils to evaluate ROS at both the cellular and the molecular
levels. Gene expression associated with both NOX subunits and anti-oxidant genes are
initially unraveling. Our findings suggest that quercetin universally effects most subunits
of NADPH oxidase. On the other hand, quercetin suppresses the activation of the
pro-inflammatory cytokine gene IL-6 and the cell death gene
CASP8, whereas it specifically increases gene expression associated with
anti-apoptosis (MCL1) resulting from respiratory oxidation.The ability of quercetin to stimulate production of ROS molecules can be implied from this
study and has been reported elsewhere [13, 17]. Those reports found that quercetin resulted in an
increased ROS production in a dose-dependent manner. Quercetin also serves as a pro-oxidant
as well as performing as a robust antioxidant [17].
Flavonoids play a pivotal role in either promoting or suppressing ROS production. The
proposed mode of action of the earlier stated natural compound may result from the higher
number of OH groups contained within the molecule which confers a stronger effect [7, 39]. The ability
of quercetin and other flavonols to scavenge hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and chloramines but
not H2O2 depends on the degree of hydroxylation of the flavonol B-ring
[39]. The structure of quercetin is similar to that
of luteolin in the flavones group. Luteolin and other similar substances have features to
that enhance ROS production as measured by flow cytometry [7]. Over a longer period of supplementation, quercetin may result in an inhibition
of ROS molecules instead of enhancement. In the present study, we used a concentration of
quercetin of 50 µM, but, no toxicity to treated cells was detected [36, 40, 50, 51].Gene expression patterns in the ROS process of chicken heterophils under quercetin
supplementation have never been reported. The results of this study show that when
heterophils receive quercetin, cells respond to the substance at both the cellular and
molecular level as indicated by the accumulation of intracellular ROS molecules (Fig. 2) and gene expression to which is part of the
ROS metabolic process (including CYBB, NOX1,
NCF1 (p47), NCF2 and
RAC2) (Fig. 3). The NOX
complex, on the other hand, when assembled into viable protein subunit complexes, transmit
signals via the protein kinase C (PKC), MAP Kinase and PKA, resulting in superoxide (SO)
production and oxidative burst in phagocytes [21,
45]. p47 is an
essential NOX subunit which translocates from cytosol to the phagosomal membrane which could
serve as a critical step in ROS production [48]. It
has been well documented that the effect of quercetin may be exerted via the function of
genes involved in other processes pertaining to ROS production. A group of genes that
neutralizes free radicals, such as CAT and SOD, is an
example of genes in which quercetin action can be observed [14, 19, 24].We report here that the expression level of the CAT gene is essentially
increased, but the level of SOD1 is reduced or unchanged. The results of
the present study are consistent with a previous report [1] in which the authors found the expression of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase and
catalase to be increased when the hepatoma cell line (HepG2) was enriched with quercetin at
50 to 100 µM. In addition, other studies have shown that quercetin and
other compounds hinder ROS generation and reduce tissue damage caused by free radicals
[23, 40].
However, little research has focused on the regulatory effects of quercetin on NADPH oxidase
subunit expression, in particular on terminally differentiated phagocytes like neutrophils
and heterophils.Results of the current experiment suggest a possible mechanism: heterophils generate
harmful molecules in response to E. coli by increasing the expression of
genes involved in the production of ROS. In reaction to noxious oxygen molecules, E.
coli has its own mechanism for manipulating the expression of SOD1, acting as
anti-oxidant in the host which neutralizes the effectiveness of quercetin modulation of ROS.
The pro-inflammatory cytokine genes in chicken heterophils, e.g., IL-1, IL-6 and IL-8, after
being triggered with ligands or pathogens may vigorously up-regulate [26, 27]. In this study, the gene
expression pattern of the IL-6 gene was disrupted by quercetin, while the
expression level of the same gene was increased when the cells were exposed to E.
coli. This finding confirms that quercetin has the effect of suppressing the
inflammatory mediator produced by pathogen-mediated signaling as previously reported [11, 30].
Therefore, we assume that quercetin keeps the level of inflammation in check by inhibition
of inflammatory cytokine in avian species, just as has been postulated in mammals.In the present study, we focused primarily on the effects and possible linkages of genes
whose expression could be manipulated by the action of quercetin. The other subunits, i.e.,
p22 (CYBA), p40 (NCF4)
and NOXO1 (p41NOX), remain unexplored. Aspects of other processes involved in the chicken
heterophils ROS generation are also reported. Our analysis of gene networks suggests there
are additional genes involved in production of ROS and accompanying antioxidants, but that
information confirmation is beyond the scope of the present study.Our findings support reports of benefits of quercetin supplementation in chicken feed.
Given on a regular basis, it is able to act as a prophylaxis and to prevent detrimental
microbial infections. Quercetin should achieve a balance between oxidative and
anti-oxidative activity in phagocytes in the process attenuating the pathological severity
of invading microbes or mitigating oxidative tissue damage by ROS generation. This concept
suggests potential therapeutic targets of ROS generation, illustrating another facet of the
properties of quercetin. Taken together, this study provides evidence that quercetin’s
effect on ROS generation helps improve chicken phagocyte function, specifically, it helps
heterophils to perform more effective and efficient oxidative killing of microbes. These
findings fill a knowledge gap in chicken innate immune response related to modulation of the
oxidative capacity of heterophils. This study also suggests potential directions for future
studies of genes or group of genes which have a role in the production of ROS. In the
future, both in vivo and in vitro studies will be needed
to elucidate the mechanisms of quercetin on the other subunits of NADPH oxidase in promoting
innate immune defense in chickens.
Authors: Everton O L Santos; Luciana M Kabeya; Andréa S G Figueiredo-Rinhel; Larissa F Marchi; Micássio F Andrade; Fabiana Piatesi; Adriana B Paoliello-Paschoalato; Ana Elisa C S Azzolini; Yara M Lucisano-Valim Journal: Int Immunopharmacol Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 4.932
Authors: Phongsakorn Chuammitri; Jelena Ostojić; Claire B Andreasen; Sarah B Redmond; Susan J Lamont; Dusan Palić Journal: Vet Immunol Immunopathol Date: 2008-12-11 Impact factor: 2.046
Authors: J Montojo; K Zuberi; H Rodriguez; F Kazi; G Wright; S L Donaldson; Q Morris; G D Bader Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Edward A Miao; Irina A Leaf; Piper M Treuting; Dat P Mao; Monica Dors; Anasuya Sarkar; Sarah E Warren; Mark D Wewers; Alan Aderem Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2010-11-07 Impact factor: 25.606