| Literature DB >> 29876514 |
Ferga C Gleeson1, Erik J Tryggestad2, Nicholas B Remmes2, Chris J Beltran2, Jon J Kruse2, Michael G Haddock2, Christopher L Hallemeier2, Andrew C Storm1, Michael J Levy1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Little consideration has been given to selection of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fiducials for proton radiotherapy and the resulting perturbations in the therapy dose and pattern. Our aim was to assess the impact of perturbations caused by six fiducials of different composition and dimensions in a phantom gel model.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29876514 PMCID: PMC5988542 DOI: 10.1055/a-0588-4800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endosc Int Open ISSN: 2196-9736
Fig. 1 aSchematic of experimental setup: a gel phantom containing fiducial samples was submerged in a water bath and irradiated with a uniform 10 × 10 cm 2 field of 119.7 MeV protons using discrete spot scanning. Exiting the water bath, the protons stopped in a paper stack arrangement interleaved with four EBT3 (Gafchromic) films spaced approximately 1.1 mm apart (water-equivalent spacing). b Digitized EBT3 film (16.3 mm behind fiducial plane, closest to the Bragg Peak) identifying the set of fiducial samples included in the present study. Note that an edge-on example for Sample 2 was not incorporated in the gel phantom. The side-on example for Sample 2 is difficult to visualize and therefore black arrows are included as a guide-to-eye (in b , c , and d ). c Dose in cGy for a set of EBT3 films exposed to the end-of-range region, with water-equivalent depths behind the fiducial plane as shown. The small ROIs indicate the regions used for nominal (or background) dose sampling (for normalization) and the large ROIs designate the cropping regions for d . d Dose difference (from background) in % for corresponding cropped film regions from c. e Dose differences observed nearest the Bragg Peak (16.3 mm film) for zoomed (6.4 × 6.4 mm 2 ) ROIs affected by the five given side-on samples (#1, #2, #4 – 6).