| Literature DB >> 29875807 |
Alice Brambilla1,2, Lukas Keller1, Bruno Bassano2, Christine Grossen1.
Abstract
Crucial for the long-term survival of wild populations is their ability to fight diseases. Disease outbreaks can lead to severe population size reductions, which makes endangered and reintroduced species especially vulnerable. In vertebrates, the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) plays an important role in determining the immune response. Species that went through severe bottlenecks often show very low levels of genetic diversity at the MHC. Due to the known link between the MHC and immune response, such species are expected to be at particular risk in case of disease outbreaks. However, so far, only few studies have shown that low MHC diversity is correlated with increased disease susceptibility in species after severe bottlenecks. We investigated genetic variation at the MHC and its correlations with disease resistance and other fitness-related traits in Alpine ibex (Capra ibex), a wild goat species that underwent a strong bottleneck in the last century and that is known to have extremely low genetic variability, both genome-wide and at the MHC. We studied MHC variation in male ibex of Gran Paradiso National Park, the population used as a source for all postbottleneck reintroductions. We found that individual MHC heterozygosity (based on six microsatellites) was not correlated with genome-wide neutral heterozygosity. MHC heterozygosity, but not genome-wide heterozygosity, was positively correlated with resistance to infectious keratoconjunctivitis and with body mass. Our results show that genetic variation at the MHC plays an important role in disease resistance and, hence, should be taken into account for successfully managing species conservation.Entities:
Keywords: Alpine ibex; MHC; bottleneck; heterozygosity–fitness correlation; infectious keratoconjunctivitis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29875807 PMCID: PMC5979623 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Appl ISSN: 1752-4571 Impact factor: 5.183
Description of the fixed part of the model set built to test heterozygosity–fitness correlations for body mass and horn growth
| Model description | Model notation of the fixed effect | AICc Body mass model | AICc Horn growth model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age2 | Trait |
|
|
| Age2, MLH neutral | Trait | 2693.307 |
|
| Age2, MLH neutral, age interaction | Trait | 2694.172 |
|
| Age2, MLH MHC | Trait |
| 2805.404 |
| Age2, MLH MHC, age interaction | Trait |
| 2806.794 |
| Age2, both MLH | Trait | 3343.984 |
|
| Age2, both MLH, age interaction | Trait |
|
|
All models also included individual id and year as random effects. Models with AICc values reported in boldface (ΔAICc < 4 compared to the best model) were used for model averaging.
MLH, multilocus heterozygosity.
Description of the fixed part of the binomial generalized linear model set built to test for correlations between heterozygosity and infectious keratoconjunctivitis (IKC)
| Model description | Model notation of the fixed effect | AICc |
|---|---|---|
| Age | logit (pIKC) |
|
| MLH MHC | logit (pIKC) |
|
| Age, MLH MHC | logit (pIKC) |
|
| Age, both MLH | logit (pIKC) |
|
Models with AICc values reported in boldface (ΔAICc < 4 compared to the best model) were used for model averaging.
MLH, multilocus heterozygosity.
Genetic diversity at six MHC‐linked markers (all samples of Gran Paradiso population, N 247)
| Locus | Na |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bf94.1 | 3 | 1.755 | 0.408 | 0.431 | 0.054 |
| BM1258 | 5 | 3.827 | 0.740 | 0.740 | 0.001 |
| BM1818 | 2 | 1.338 | 0.272 | 0.253 | −0.074 |
| OLADRB1 | 3 | 2.051 | 0.432 | 0.514 | 0.159 |
| OLADRB2 | 2 | 1.044 | 0.034 | 0.042 | 0.184 |
| OMHC1 | 4 | 1.585 | 0.349 | 0.370 | 0.057 |
| 37 neutral loci | 3.54 | 2.02 | 0.435 | 0.455 | 0.045 |
Na, number of alleles observed; A E, effective number of alleles (=number of equally frequent alleles it would take to achieve a given level of gene diversity); H O, observed heterozygosity; H E, expected heterozygosity; G IS, deviation from HWE.
Mean number of alleles at MHC‐linked microsatellites was 3.17 (mean A E: 1.93).
Figure 1Principle component analysis based on 37 microsatellites of the Gran Paradiso individuals used for the heterozygosity–fitness correlations. Each circle represents an individual, and the size of the circle shows its multilocus heterozygosity at the MHC markers
Figure 2Allele frequencies of all six MHC markers calculated for individuals (N = 57) sampled before the disease outbreak (from 2002 to 2004, purple) and individuals (N = 37) sampled after the disease outbreak (from 2009 to 2011, green). Figure S1 for allele frequencies among individuals sampled before 2001
Standardized averaged coefficient of the mixed‐effects models built to test heterozygosity–fitness correlations
| Parameter | Model Body massβ ± SE, (Confidence intervals) | Model Horn Growth β ± SE, (Confidence intervals) |
|---|---|---|
| MLH neutral | 0.912 ± 1.483, (−1.995, 3.819) | 0.227 ± 0.186, (−0.137, 0.591) |
| MLH MHC |
| 0.001 ± 0.021, (−0.039, 0.042) |
| Age |
| − |
| Age2 | − | − |
| MLH neutral*age | −0.985 ± 1.198, (−3.333, 1.363) | 0.014 ± 0.086, (−0.155, 0.183) |
| MLH MHC*age | −1.303 ± 1.219, (−3.692, 1.086) | 0.002 ± 0.026, (−0.049, 0.052) |
|
| .601, .909 | .290, .409 |
A separate set of models was built for each of the fitness‐related traits. Coefficients were obtained through natural model averaging between models with ΔAIC < 4 compared to the best model. Values in boldface represent coefficients and confidence intervals that did not overlap zero. The last line of the table reports R m and R c for the best model for each trait. R m and R c represent marginal and conditional pseudo‐R ‐values.
Figure 3(a) Correlation between body mass and multilocus heterozygosity (MLH) at the MHC shown individually for each age class (from age 4 to age 15); parameter estimates of the corresponding model are presented in Table 4. (b) Boxplots of body mass and heterozygosity of OLADRB1 shown individually for each age class (from age 4 to age 15). Parameter estimates of the corresponding model are presented in Table 5. The number of observations for each age class was as follows (age = N): age 4 = 16; age 5 = 37; age 6 = 47; age 7 = 54; age 8 = 50; age 9 = 54; age 10 = 49; age 11 = 38; age 12 = 25; age 13 = 21; age 14 = 12; age 15 = 6
Summary table of the separate models built for each marker and each trait
| Genetic marker | Body mass β ± SE, (Confidence intervals) | Horn growth β ± SE, (Confidence intervals) |
|---|---|---|
| OLADRB1 |
| 0.006 |
| OLADRB2 | 0.159 ± 4.329, (−8.326, 8.644) | −0.289 ± 0.543, (−1.353, 0.775) |
| OMHC1 | −0.675 ± 1.652, (−3.91, 2.563) | 0.061 ± 0.146, (−0.225, 0.347) |
| Bf94.1 |
| 0.022 ± 0.156, (−0.284, 0.328) |
For each model, averaged standardized coefficients, SE, and confidence intervals of the genetic term are presented. Model average was performed on genetic and age model when Δ AICc between the two was <4. Values in boldface represent coefficients and confidence intervals that did not overlap zero.
Summary table of the conditional standardized averaged coefficients for the logistic regression built to test for a correlation between infectious keratoconjunctivitis, heterozygosity, and age
| Parameter | β ± SE, (Confidence intervals) | Odds ratio, (CI 2.5%–97.5%) |
|---|---|---|
| MLH neutral | 1.886 ± 2.103, (−2.236, 6.008) | 6.600, (0.098, 444.050) |
| MLH MHC | − | 0.401, (0.160, 1.008) |
| Age | 0.065 ± 0.084, (−0.100, 0.230) | 1.068, (0.902, 1.263) |
Pseudo‐R of the full model = .11. MLH, multilocus heterozygosity. N = 66. Values in boldface represent coefficients and confidence intervals that did not overlap zero.
Figure 4Boxplot showing multilocus heterozygosity at the MHC (MLH MHC) of individuals that did not show infectious keratoconjunctivitis symptoms (not infected, N = 41) compared to symptomatic individuals (infected, N = 25). Parameter estimates of the corresponding model are presented in Table 6