| Literature DB >> 29875679 |
Charlotte Fiskum1, Tonje G Andersen1, Xavier Bornas2, Per M Aslaksen3, Magne A Flaten1, Karl Jacobsen1.
Abstract
Background: Internalizing psychopathology and dysregulated negative affect are characterized by dysregulation in the autonomic nervous system and reduced heart rate variability (HRV) due to increases in sympathetic activity alongside reduced vagal tone. The neurovisceral system is however, a complex nonlinear system, and nonlinear indices related to psychopathology are so far less studied in children. Essential nonlinear properties of a system can be found in two main domains: the informational domain and the invariant domain. sample entropy (SampEn) is a much-used method from the informational domain, while detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) represents a widely-used method from the invariant domain. To see if nonlinear HRV can provide information beyond linear indices of autonomic activation, this study investigated SampEn and DFA as discriminators of internalizing psychopathology and negative affect alongside measures of vagally-mediated HRV and sympathetic activation. Material andEntities:
Keywords: HRV; RMSSD; anxiety; depression; detrended fluctuation analysis; non-linear time-series analysis; pre-ejection period; sample entropy
Year: 2018 PMID: 29875679 PMCID: PMC5974559 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Descriptive statistics and between-group differences.
| Internalizing Prob. | 32 | 6.4 | 0.8 | 25 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 9.1 | 2.4 | |
| Affective Problems | 32 | 6.4 | 0.9 | 25 | 5.1 | 0.3 | |||
| Anxiety Problems | 32 | 6.4 | 0.7 | 25 | 5.1 | 0.3 | |||
| Negative Affect | 32 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 25 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 4.8 | 1.3 | |
| Aggression | 32 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 25 | 1.7 | 0.6 | |||
| Frustration | 32 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 25 | 2.4 | 0.7 | |||
| Depressive Mood | 32 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 25 | 2.0 | 0.6 | |||
| Fear | 32 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 25 | 2.1 | 0.7 | |||
| Shyness | 32 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 25 | 2.3 | 0.6 | |||
| Effortful Control | 32 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 25 | 3.8 | 0.5 | −2.5 | −0.7 | |
| HR | 32 | 78.2 | 8.3 | 25 | 80.3 | 8.8 | −0.9 | 0.36 | |
| PEP | 30 | 122.3 | 6.1 | 25 | 117.9 | 5.8 | 2.7 | 0.7 | |
| RMSSD | 31 | 73.8 | 39.4 | 25 | 67.9 | 35.9 | 0.6 | 0.56 | |
| SampEn | 31 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 25 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.71 | |
| DFA-α1 | 32 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 25 | 0.8 | 0.2 | −0.3 | 0.77 | |
Between group differences was conducted using independent t-tests (t); SD, standard deviation; DFA, detrended fluctuation analysis; HR, mean heart rate; RMSSD, root mean square of successive differences; PEP, pre-ejection period; SampEn, sample entropy;
p ≤ 0.05;
p ≤ 0.01;
p ≤ 0.001, a minor portion of this table has been published in Fiskum et al. (2017)
Correlations between cardiac variables in the clinical group.
| MeanHR | 1 | ||||
| – | |||||
| 32 | |||||
| PEP | −0.32 | 1 | |||
| 0.08 | – | ||||
| 30 | 30 | ||||
| RMSSD | 0.15 | 1 | |||
| <0.001 | 0.43 | – | |||
| 31 | 29 | 31 | |||
| SampEn | −0.19 | 0.16 | −0.25 | 1 | |
| 0.31 | 0.40 | 0.18 | – | ||
| 31 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
| DFA-α1 | −0.29 | 0.19 | |||
| 0.001 | 0.13 | <0.001 | 0.31 | ||
| 32 | 30 | 31 | 31 |
r, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient; DFA, detrended fluctuation analysis; RMSSD, root mean square of successive differences; PEP, pre-ejection period; SampEn, sample entropy;
p ≤ 0.001.
Correlations between cardiac variables in the control group.
| MeanHR | 1 | ||||
| – | |||||
| 25 | |||||
| PEP | 1 | ||||
| 0.02 | – | ||||
| 25 | 25 | ||||
| RMSSD | 1 | ||||
| < 0.001 | 0.01 | – | |||
| 25 | 25 | 25 | |||
| SampEn | 0.04 | 0.15 | 1 | ||
| 0.02 | 0.87 | 0.47 | – | ||
| 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | ||
| DFA-α1 | 0.35 | −0.33 | −0.31 | ||
| 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.13 | ||
| 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
r, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient; DFA, detrended fluctuation analysis; RMSSD, root mean square of successive differences; PEP, pre-ejection period; SampEn, sample entropy;
p ≤ 0.05;
p ≤ 0.01;
p ≤ 0.001.
Correlations between CBCL clinical scales and cardiac variables.
| SampEn | ρ | −0.35 | |
| 0.02 | 0.053 | ||
| 31 | 31 | ||
| DFA-α1 | ρ | −0.16 | −0.19 |
| 0.38 | 0.31 | ||
| 32 | 32 | ||
| SampEn | ρ | 0.06 | |
| 0.79 | 0.01 | ||
| 25 | 25 | ||
| DFA-α1 | ρ | 0.13 | 0.09 |
| 0.55 | 0.68 | ||
| 25 | 25 | ||
ρ, Spearman's ranked order correlation coefficient; DFA, detrended fluctuation analysis; SampEn, sample entropy;
p ≤ 0.05;
p ≤ 0.01.
Correlations between EATQ-R scales and cardiac variables.
| SampEn | −0.30 | −0.28 | −0.19 | ||||
| 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.31 | 0.02 | ||
| 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | ||
| DFA-α1 | −0.09 | −0.21 | −0.11 | −0.17 | −0.03 | −0.08 | |
| 0.61 | 0.25 | 0.57 | 0.36 | 0.88 | 0.67 | ||
| 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | ||
| SampEn | −0.18 | −0.36 | −0.04 | −0.32 | −0.15 | 0.13 | |
| 0.39 | 0.08 | 0.84 | 0.12 | 0.48 | 0.55 | ||
| 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | ||
| DFA-α1 | 0.36 | −0.01 | −0.02 | −0.22 | 0.22 | 0.004 | |
| 0.08 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.99 | ||
| 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | ||
r, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient; DFA, detrended fluctuation analysis; SampEn, sample entropy;
p ≤ 0.05;
p ≤ 0.01.
Model effects for DFA-α1, SampEn, RMSSD, and PEP as predictors of internalizing psychopathology.
| Full model | 52 | 9 | 55.2 | |||||||
| Factors | Group | 56.9 | −2.4 | −1.9 | −1.4 | 0.2 | ≤ 0.001 | |||
| Sex | 0 | 0.97 | ||||||||
| Co-variables | Age | 0.1 | 0.72 | |||||||
| BMI | 0.8 | 0.39 | ||||||||
| HR | 0.6 | 0.46 | ||||||||
| Predictors | RMSSD | 1.5 | 0.23 | |||||||
| PEP | 0.0 | 0.93 | ||||||||
| SampEn | 8.0 | −0.8 | −0.4 | −0.1 | 0.7 | 0.024 | ||||
| Interaction | Group × SampEn | 0.3 | 0.56 | |||||||
| Full model | 54 | 9 | 57.0 | |||||||
| Factors | Group | 80.8 | −2.6 | −2.1 | −1.7 | 0.1 | ≤ 0.001 | |||
| Sex | 1.3 | 0.26 | ||||||||
| Co-variables | Age | 0.3 | 0.56 | |||||||
| BMI | 0.0 | 0.99 | ||||||||
| HR | 0.7 | 0.41 | ||||||||
| Predictors | PEP | 0.5 | 0.49 | |||||||
| RMSSD | 0.5 | 0.48 | ||||||||
| DFA-α1 | 4.3 | −0.9 | −0.5 | −0.1 | 0.6 | 0.010 | ||||
| Interaction | Group × DFA-α1 | 2.9 | 0.09 | |||||||
Results were calculated with a generalized linear model using a normal probability distribution and identity link function. BMI, body mass index; HR, heart-rate; RMSSD, root mean square of successive differences; PEP, pre-ejection period; SampEn, sample entropy; DFA, detrended fluctuation analysis;
p ≤ 0.05;
p ≤ 0.01;
p ≤ 0.001.
Model effects for DFA-α1, SampEn, RMSSD, and PEP as predictors of Negative Affect.
| Full model | 52 | 9 | 37.9 | |||||||
| Factors | Group | 34.1 | −1.0 | −0.7 | −0.5 | 0.5 | ≤ 0.001 | |||
| Sex | 0.6 | 0.46 | ||||||||
| Co-variables | Age | 2.2 | 0.14 | |||||||
| BMI | 1.9 | 0.17 | ||||||||
| HR | 1.6 | 0.21 | ||||||||
| Predictors | RMSSD | 5.3 | −0.5 | −0.3 | −0.04 | 0.8 | 0.021 | |||
| PEP | 1.5 | 0.22 | ||||||||
| SampEn | 8.9 | −0.5 | −0.3 | −0.1 | 0.8 | 0.005 | ||||
| Interaction | Group × SampEn | 0.1 | 0.77 | |||||||
| Full model | 53 | 9 | 34.6 | |||||||
| Factors | Group | 39.8 | −1.0 | −0.8 | −0.6 | 0.5 | ≤ 0.001 | |||
| Sex | 3.2 | 0.074 | ||||||||
| Co-variables | Age | 1.6 | 0.21 | |||||||
| BMI | 0.0 | 0.98 | ||||||||
| HR | 0.5 | 0.50 | ||||||||
| Predictors | PEP | 4.0 | −0.3 | −0.2 | −0.003 | 0.9 | 0.045 | |||
| RMSSD | 1.5 | 0.22 | ||||||||
| DFA-α1 | 3.1 | 0.08 | ||||||||
| Interaction | Group × DFA-α1 | 1.8 | 0.18 | |||||||
Results were calculated with a generalized linear model using a normal probability distribution and identity link function. BMI, body mass index; HR, heart-rate; RMSSD, root mean square of successive differences; PEP, pre-ejection period; SampEn, sample entropy; DFA, detrended fluctuation analysis;
p ≤ 0.05;
p ≤ 0.01;
p ≤ 0.001.