Literature DB >> 29875300

Exaggerated male legs increase mating success by reducing disturbance to females in the cave wētā Pachyrhamma waitomoensis.

Murray Fea1, Gregory I Holwell2.   

Abstract

Mate guarding is a widespread behaviour resulting from sperm competition and conflict over optimal remating rates. It is a key way in which males exhibit differential mating investment, and represents a complex interplay between mating effort, intrasexual competition, opportunity costs and sexual conflict. Nevertheless, although there are many examples of exaggerated male structures used to fight rivals, few animals have developed specialized male morphological adaptations for directly sheltering females from disturbance by non-rivals. Here we report on the use of sexually dimorphic, elongated male hind legs, which are used to guard females in the New Zealand cave wētā Pachyrhamma waitomoensis (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae). We found that male hind legs alongside the female failed to deter rivals from accessing her or disrupting copulation. However, they did reduce the disturbance to females from other, non-rival animals such as juveniles and heterospecifics. Males with longer hind legs were more effective in reducing disturbance, and remained with females for longer. Longer guarding periods also led to higher numbers of matings between pairs. Models of males with artificially altered hind leg dimensions also showed a benefit to greater leg length, and artificially altering the disturbance rate to females also had a significant effect on pair duration. Our results indicate that nuisance disturbance to females may play an important role in driving sexual selection on male leg length and its exaggeration in this species.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Keywords:  Rhaphidophoridae; exaggerated traits; mate guarding; wētā

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29875300      PMCID: PMC6015848          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures.

Authors:  D J Emlen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sexual conflict in Sepsis cynipsea: female reluctance, fertility and mate choice.

Authors:  D J Hosken; O Y Martin; J Born; F Huber
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype.

Authors:  Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sexually dimorphic legs in a neotropical harvestman (Arachnida, Opiliones): ornament or weapon?

Authors:  Rodrigo H Willemart; Francini Osses; Marie Claire Chelini; Rogelio Macías-Ordóñez; Glauco Machado
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Spermatophore production and egg-laying behaviour in Rhodnius prolixus Stal. (Hemiptera; Reduviidae).

Authors:  A KHALIFA
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Understanding promiscuity: when is seeking additional mates better than guarding an already found one?

Authors:  Anna M F Harts; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Sexual selection.

Authors:  M Andersson; Y Iwasa
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  EVIDENCE FOR WIDESPREAD COURTSHIP DURING COPULATION IN 131 SPECIES OF INSECTS AND SPIDERS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE.

Authors:  William G Eberhard
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Allocation to Mate Guarding or Increased Sperm Production in a Mediterranean Wrasse.

Authors:  Suzanne H Alonzo; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Ferocious fighting between male grasshoppers.

Authors:  Kate D L Umbers; Nikolai J Tatarnic; Gregory I Holwell; Marie E Herberstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.