| Literature DB >> 29587505 |
Suzanne H Alonzo, Robert R Warner.
Abstract
An excellent body of literature exists that examines sperm expenditure when males allocate only to sperm production. However, in many species, males can also allocate energy to behaviors that influence sperm competition. We model whether males in sperm competition should allocate energy to mate guarding or additional sperm production. Mate guarding is predicted to lead to greater reproductive success than increased sperm output, and mate-guarding males are not predicted to alter their allocation to sperm production with increasing sperm competition. Only when mate guarding is ineffective or greatly reduces sperm production are males predicted to allocate to sperm production. In a Mediterranean wrasse Symphodus ocellatus, three male alternative reproductive behaviors coexist. While nesting males and satellites guard mates to decrease sperm competition, sneaker males only compete via sperm production. Sneakers produce four times as much sperm per spawn as either nesting males or satellites. As predicted by the model, mate guarding but not sperm production increased with increased risk of sperm competition in nesting males. We argue that this can be explained by nesting males allocating to mate guarding rather than sperm production. Considering allocation among behaviors that affect sperm competition enhances our ability to explain and to predict sperm allocation patterns.Entities:
Keywords: Labridae; alternative behaviors; energetic trade‐off; energy allocation model; sperm competition
Year: 2000 PMID: 29587505 DOI: 10.1086/303391
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am Nat ISSN: 0003-0147 Impact factor: 3.926