| Literature DB >> 29874799 |
Shu-Ying Xu1, Jie Kan2, Zhong Hu3, Yang Liu4, Hong Du5, Guang-Chang Pang6, Kit-Leong Cheong7.
Abstract
Neoagaro-oligosaccharides (NAOS) have health benefits that are related to their amount and degree of polymerization (DP). However, the current methods that are used to quantify enzymatically released NAOS are un-specific and time-consuming. Agar has been extracted from Gelidium amansii and has been degraded by AgaXa (a recombinant β-agarase). Polysaccharide analysis using carbohydrate gel electrophoresis (PACE) has been adapted in order to quantify NAOS. In addition, the anti-oxidant activity of the degraded samples has been assessed. We have found that the PACE method provided sensitive, precise, and accurate quantification for each of the six NAOS samples. PACE has revealed that the DP of the enzymatic products from the AgaXa digestion were mainly neoagaro-octaose and neoagaro-decaose. The degraded samples exhibited increased radical-scavenging activity towards 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl and 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline sulfonic acid) radicals. While the anti-oxidant activity may have been from NAOS activity and contributions from neoagaro-octaose and neoagaro-decaose. The adapted PACE method that has been presented here is promising for large sample analysis during quality control and for characterizing novel β-agarase degradation mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: Gelidium amansii agar; anti-oxidant; neoagaro-oligosaccharides; β-agarase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29874799 PMCID: PMC6100174 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23061354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Schematic structure of agaro-oligosaccharides (AOS) and neoagaro-oligosaccharides (NAOS).
Calibration data, limit of quantitation (LOQ), and limit of detection (LOD) of the neoagaro-oligosaccharides.
| Analytes | Regression Equation 2 |
| Test Range (mg/L) | LOQ (mg/L) | LOD (mg/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| DP 2 1 | 1.0563 ± 0.0302 | 1.3089 ± 0.1128 | 0.9938 | 15.0–200.5 | 12.1 | 3.6 |
| DP 4 | 1.7773 ± 0.0428 | 4.3829 ± 0.3733 | 0.9955 | 13.2–185.6 | 11.8 | 2.9 |
| DP 6 | 0.8025 ± 0.0231 | 0.6730 ± 0.0902 | 0.9976 | 12.3–200.4 | 12.3 | 3.7 |
| DP 8 | 1.0226 ± 0.0300 | 2.0276 ± 0.1536 | 0.9991 | 10.1–215.2 | 7.9 | 2.7 |
| DP 10 | 0.4370 ± 0.0137 | 4.5687 ± 0.4082 | 0.9945 | 11.7–210.8 | 10.0 | 3.1 |
| DP 12 | 0.6856 ± 0.0151 | 1.6525 ± 0.1325 | 0.9974 | 15.2–192.7 | 8.3 | 2.5 |
1 DP—degree of polymerization; 2 Regression equation—Y = aX + b, where, Y is the peak area (Int × mm), X is the concentration of standard NAOS (mg/L), a is the slope, and b is the Y-intercept (n = 3); 3 r—correlation coefficient.
Precision, accuracy, stability, repeatability, and recovery of neo-agarooligosaccharides.
| Analytes | Precision (RSD, %) | Accuracy (%) | Stability | Repeatability | Recovery | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instrument | Identical Gel | Different Gel | Low | Medium | High | (RSD, %) | (RSD, %) | (%) | |
| DP 2 1 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 97.3 | 102.2 | 98.6 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 99.4 |
| DP 6 | 0.8 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 98.1 | 100.6 | 95.2 | 2.6 | 5.3 | 97.8 |
| DP 8 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 96.5 | 99.6 | 93.8 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 95.7 |
| DP 10 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 99.5 | 103.7 | 95.7 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 97.8 |
| DP 12 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 93.1 | 97.0 | 93.5 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 93.7 |
1 DP—degree of polymerization.
Figure 2Time course of agar digestion analyzed by polysaccharide analysis using carbohydrate gel electrophoresis (PACE). M indicates the neoagaro-oligosaccharide standards. DP2—neoagaro-biose; DP4—neoagaro-tetraose; DP6—neoagaro-hexaose; DP8—neoagaro-octaose; DP10—neoagaro-decaose; DP12—neoagaro-dodecaose).
Concentrations of neoagaro-oligosaccharides in different enzymatic time determined with PACE and DNS.
| Method and Analyses | β-Agarase Digestion/Min | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 15 | 30 | 40 | 90 | 120 | |
| DNS 1 | 4.7 | 34.8 | 70.9 | 188.4 | 191.6 | 321.9 | 355.1 |
| Total NAOS by PACE 2 (mg/L) | N.D. 4 | 25.6 | 101.6 | 221.8 | 243.1 | 373.7 | 410.2 |
| DP 2 3 (mg/L) | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. |
| DP 4 (mg/L) | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. |
| DP 6 (mg/L) | N.D. | N.D. | Trace | 13.3 | 14.1 | 36.2 | 43.6 |
| DP 8 (mg/L) | N.D. | 12.3 | 31.2 | 70.2 | 75.2 | 126.6 | 134.9 |
| DP 10 (mg/L) | N.D. | 13.3 | 46.1 | 95.1 | 109.4 | 152.5 | 170.3 |
| DP 12 (mg/L) | N.D. | Trace | 24.3 | 43.2 | 44.4 | 58.4 | 61.4 |
1 DNS—dinitrosalicylic acid; 2 PACE—polysaccharide analysis using carbohydrate gel electrophoresi; 3 DP—degree of polymerization; 4 N.D.—not detected.
Figure 3Scavenging ability of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (A) and 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (ANTS) (B) radicals of the digested sample. A concentration of 200 mg/L of ascorbic acid (Vc) was used as the positive control. * Shows statistically significant differences from value at 0 h, p < 0.05; ** Shows extremely significant differences from value at 0 h, p < 0.01 (n = 3).