Tugce Colluoglu1, Zulkif Tanriverdi2, Baris Unal3, Emin Evren Ozcan4, Huseyin Dursun4, Dayimi Kaya4. 1. Department of Cardiology, Karabuk Education and Research Hospital, Karabuk, Turkey. 2. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey. 3. Clinic of Cardiology, Cumra State Hospital, Konya, Turkey. 4. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no study so far investigated the importance of post-procedural frontal QRS-T angle f(QRS-T) in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of our study was to investigate the role of baseline and post-procedural f(QRS-T) angles for determining high risk STEMI patients, and the success of reperfusion. METHODS: A total of 248 patients with first acute STEMI that underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or thrombolytic therapy (TT) between 2013 and 2014 were included in this study. Baseline f(QRS-T) angle was defined as the angle which measured from the first ECG at the time of hospital admission. Post-procedural (QRS-T) angle was defined according to the treatment strategy as follows: the angle which measured from the post-PCI ECG in patients treated with pPCI; the angle which measured from the ECG taken 90 min after onset of therapy in patients treated with TT. RESULTS: The baseline (101.9° ± 48.0 vs. 72.1° ± 49.1, p = 0.014) and post-procedural f(QRS-T) angles (95.7° ± 48.1 vs. 58.1° ± 47.1, p = 0.002) were significantly higher in patients who developed in-hospital mortality than the patients who did not develop in-hospital mortality. Also, f(QRS-T) angle measured at 90 min was significantly lower in patients with successful thrombolysis group compared to failed thrombolysis group (53.2° ± 42.8 vs. 77.3° ± 52.9, p = 0.033), whereas baseline f(QRS-T) angle was similar between two groups (78.6° ± 53.4 vs. 78.9° ± 54.0, p = 0.976). Multivariate analysis showed that post-procedural f(QRS-T) angle ≥89.6° (odds ratio: 3.541, 95% confidence interval: 1.235-10.154, p = 0.019), but not baseline f(QRS-T) angle, was independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: f(QRS-T) angle may be used as a beneficial tool for determining high risk patients in acute STEMI. Unlike previous studies, we showed for the first time that that post-procedural f(QRS-T) can predict in-hospital mortality and TT failure.
BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no study so far investigated the importance of post-procedural frontal QRS-T angle f(QRS-T) in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of our study was to investigate the role of baseline and post-procedural f(QRS-T) angles for determining high risk STEMI patients, and the success of reperfusion. METHODS: A total of 248 patients with first acute STEMI that underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or thrombolytic therapy (TT) between 2013 and 2014 were included in this study. Baseline f(QRS-T) angle was defined as the angle which measured from the first ECG at the time of hospital admission. Post-procedural (QRS-T) angle was defined according to the treatment strategy as follows: the angle which measured from the post-PCI ECG in patients treated with pPCI; the angle which measured from the ECG taken 90 min after onset of therapy in patients treated with TT. RESULTS: The baseline (101.9° ± 48.0 vs. 72.1° ± 49.1, p = 0.014) and post-procedural f(QRS-T) angles (95.7° ± 48.1 vs. 58.1° ± 47.1, p = 0.002) were significantly higher in patients who developed in-hospital mortality than the patients who did not develop in-hospital mortality. Also, f(QRS-T) angle measured at 90 min was significantly lower in patients with successful thrombolysis group compared to failed thrombolysis group (53.2° ± 42.8 vs. 77.3° ± 52.9, p = 0.033), whereas baseline f(QRS-T) angle was similar between two groups (78.6° ± 53.4 vs. 78.9° ± 54.0, p = 0.976). Multivariate analysis showed that post-procedural f(QRS-T) angle ≥89.6° (odds ratio: 3.541, 95% confidence interval: 1.235-10.154, p = 0.019), but not baseline f(QRS-T) angle, was independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: f(QRS-T) angle may be used as a beneficial tool for determining high risk patients in acute STEMI. Unlike previous studies, we showed for the first time that that post-procedural f(QRS-T) can predict in-hospital mortality and TT failure.
Authors: Mark T Lown; Theresa Munyombwe; Wendy Harrison; Robert M West; Christiana A Hall; Christine Morrell; Beryl M Jackson; Robert J Sapsford; Niamh Kilcullen; Christopher B Pepper; Phil D Batin; Alistair S Hall; Chris P Gale Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe Journal: Circulation Date: 1975-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Aapo L Aro; Heikki V Huikuri; Jani T Tikkanen; M Juhani Junttila; Harri A Rissanen; Antti Reunanen; Olli Anttonen Journal: Europace Date: 2011-12-19 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Zhu-Ming Zhang; Ronald J Prineas; Douglas Case; Elsayed Z Soliman; Pentti M Rautaharju Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Chandrasekar Palaniswamy; Tarunjit Singh; Wilbert S Aronow; Chul Ahn; Kumar Kalapatapu; Melvin B Weiss; Anthony L Pucillo; Craig E Monsen Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2009-12
Authors: Andrew Oehler; Trevor Feldman; Charles A Henrikson; Larisa G Tereshchenko Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Alex Y Tan; Bruce D Nearing; Michael Rosenberg; Reza Nezafat; Mark E Josephson; Richard L Verrier Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2017-08-04