Literature DB >> 22071208

Association of frontal QRS-T angle--age risk score on admission electrocardiogram with mortality in patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome.

Mark T Lown1, Theresa Munyombwe, Wendy Harrison, Robert M West, Christiana A Hall, Christine Morrell, Beryl M Jackson, Robert J Sapsford, Niamh Kilcullen, Christopher B Pepper, Phil D Batin, Alistair S Hall, Chris P Gale.   

Abstract

Risk assessment is central to the management of acute coronary syndromes. Often, however, assessment is not complete until the troponin concentration is available. Using 2 multicenter prospective observational studies (Evaluation of Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events [EMMACE] 2, test cohort, 1,843 patients; and EMMACE-1, validation cohort, 550 patients) of unselected patients with acute coronary syndromes, a point-of-admission risk stratification tool using frontal QRS-T angle derived from automated measurements and age for the prediction of 30-day and 2-year mortality was evaluated. Two-year mortality was lowest in patients with frontal QRS-T angles <38° and highest in patients with frontal QRS-T angles >104° (44.7% vs 14.8%, p <0.001). Increasing frontal QRS-T angle-age risk (FAAR) scores were associated with increasing 30-day and 2-year mortality (for 2-year mortality, score 0 = 3.7%, score 4 = 57%; p <0.001). The FAAR score was a good discriminator of mortality (C statistics 0.74 [95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.78] at 30 days and 0.77 [95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.79] at 2 years), maintained its performance in the EMMACE-1 cohort at 30 days (C statistics 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.8] at 30 days and 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.83] at 2 years), in men and women, in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and compared favorably with the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score. The integrated discrimination improvement (age to FAAR score at 30 days and at 2 years in EMMACE-1 and EMMACE-2) was p <0.001. In conclusion, the FAAR score is a point-of-admission risk tool that predicts 30-day and 2-year mortality from 2 variables across a spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndromes. It does not require the results of biomarker assays or rely on the subjective interpretation of electrocardiograms.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22071208     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

1.  Normal standards for computer-ECG programs for prognostically and diagnostically important ECG variables derived from a large ethnically diverse female cohort: the Women's Health Initiative (WHI).

Authors:  Pentti M Rautaharju; Zhu-ming Zhang; Richard E Gregg; Wesley K Haisty; Mara Z Vitolins; Anne B Curtis; James Warren; Milan B Horaĉek; Sophia H Zhou; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  The role of baseline and post-procedural frontal plane QRS-T angles for cardiac risk assessment in patients with acute STEMI.

Authors:  Tugce Colluoglu; Zulkif Tanriverdi; Baris Unal; Emin Evren Ozcan; Huseyin Dursun; Dayimi Kaya
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Usefulness of electrocardiographic QRS/T angles with versus without bundle branch blocks to predict heart failure (from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study).

Authors:  Zhu-ming Zhang; Pentti M Rautaharju; Ronald J Prineas; Laura Loehr; Wayne Rosamond; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  A wide QRS/T angle in bundle branch blocks is associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Authors:  Zhu-Ming Zhang; Pentti M Rautaharju; Ronald J Prineas; Eric A Whitsel; Larisa Tereshchenko; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.438

Review 5.  QRS-T angle: a review.

Authors:  Andrew Oehler; Trevor Feldman; Charles A Henrikson; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Association of corrected QT interval with long-term mortality in patients with syncope.

Authors:  Nivas Balasubramaniyam; Chandrasekar Palaniswamy; Wilbert S Aronow; Sahil Khera; Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian; Prakash Harikrishnan; Jay V Doshi; Christopher Nabors; Stephen J Peterson; Sachin Sule
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  Value of the Qrs-T angle in predicting the induction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with Chagas disease.

Authors:  Hugo Bizetto Zampa; Dalmo A R Moreira; Carlos Alberto Brandão Ferreira Filho; Charles Rios Souza; Camila Caldas Menezes; Henrique Seichii Hirata; Luciana Vidal Armaganijan
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Evaluation of the Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events (EMMACE)-3: protocol for a longitudinal study.

Authors:  O A Alabas; R M West; R G Gillott; R Khatib; A S Hall; C P Gale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Electrocardiographic predictors of coronary heart disease and sudden cardiac deaths in men and women free from cardiovascular disease in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study.

Authors:  Pentti M Rautaharju; Zhu-Ming Zhang; James Warren; Richard E Gregg; Wesley K Haisty; Anna M Kucharska-Newton; Wayne D Rosamond; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Spatial/Frontal QRS-T Angle Predicts All-Cause Mortality and Cardiac Mortality: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinlin Zhang; Qingqing Zhu; Li Zhu; He Jiang; Jun Xie; Wei Huang; Biao Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.