Russell Frood1, Ebrahim Palkhi2, Mark Barnfield3, Robin Prestwich4, Sriram Vaidyanathan2, Andrew Scarsbrook2,5. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK. russellfrood@nhs.net. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK. 3. Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK. 4. Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK. 5. Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the utility of MR texture analysis (MRTA) for detection of nodal extracapsular spread (ECS) in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS: 115 patients with oral cavity SCC treated with surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy were identified retrospectively. First-order texture parameters (entropy, skewness and kurtosis) were extracted from tumour and nodal regions of interest (ROIs) using proprietary software (TexRAD). Nodal MR features associated with ECS (flare sign, irregular capsular contour; local infiltration; nodal necrosis) were reviewed and agreed in consensus by two experienced radiologists. Diagnostic performance characteristics of MR features of ECS were compared with primary tumour and nodal MRTA prediction using histology as the gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and regression analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Nodal entropy derived from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images was significant in predicting ECS (p = 0.018). MR features had varying accuracy: flare sign (70%); irregular contour (71%); local infiltration (66%); and nodal necrosis (64%). Nodal entropy combined with irregular contour was the best predictor of ECS (p = 0.004, accuracy 79%). CONCLUSION: First-order nodal MRTA combined with imaging features may improve ECS prediction in oral cavity SCC. KEY POINTS: • Nodal MR textural analysis can aid in predicting extracapsular spread (ECS). • Medium filter contrast-enhanced T1 nodal entropy was strongly significant in predicting ECS. • Combining nodal entropy with irregular nodal contour improves predictive accuracy.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the utility of MR texture analysis (MRTA) for detection of nodal extracapsular spread (ECS) in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS: 115 patients with oral cavity SCC treated with surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy were identified retrospectively. First-order texture parameters (entropy, skewness and kurtosis) were extracted from tumour and nodal regions of interest (ROIs) using proprietary software (TexRAD). Nodal MR features associated with ECS (flare sign, irregular capsular contour; local infiltration; nodal necrosis) were reviewed and agreed in consensus by two experienced radiologists. Diagnostic performance characteristics of MR features of ECS were compared with primary tumour and nodal MRTA prediction using histology as the gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and regression analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Nodal entropy derived from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images was significant in predicting ECS (p = 0.018). MR features had varying accuracy: flare sign (70%); irregular contour (71%); local infiltration (66%); and nodal necrosis (64%). Nodal entropy combined with irregular contour was the best predictor of ECS (p = 0.004, accuracy 79%). CONCLUSION: First-order nodal MRTA combined with imaging features may improve ECS prediction in oral cavity SCC. KEY POINTS: • Nodal MR textural analysis can aid in predicting extracapsular spread (ECS). • Medium filter contrast-enhanced T1 nodal entropy was strongly significant in predicting ECS. • Combining nodal entropy with irregular nodal contour improves predictive accuracy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Lymphatic metastases; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mouth neoplasms
Authors: Marius E Mayerhoefer; Pavol Szomolanyi; Daniel Jirak; Andrzej Materka; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Volkert B Wreesmann; Nora Katabi; Frank L Palmer; Pablo H Montero; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Mithat Gönen; Diane Carlson; Ian Ganly; Jatin P Shah; Ronald Ghossein; Snehal G Patel Journal: Head Neck Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Philippe Lambin; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Timo M Deist; Jurgen Peerlings; Evelyn E C de Jong; Janita van Timmeren; Sebastian Sanduleanu; Ruben T H M Larue; Aniek J G Even; Arthur Jochems; Yvonka van Wijk; Henry Woodruff; Johan van Soest; Tim Lustberg; Erik Roelofs; Wouter van Elmpt; Andre Dekker; Felix M Mottaghy; Joachim E Wildberger; Sean Walsh Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Harbir S Sidhu; Salvatore Benigno; Balaji Ganeshan; Nikos Dikaios; Edward W Johnston; Clare Allen; Alex Kirkham; Ashley M Groves; Hashim U Ahmed; Mark Emberton; Stuart A Taylor; Steve Halligan; Shonit Punwani Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 5.315