Literature DB >> 29871979

The Persistent Homology Mathematical Framework Provides Enhanced Genotype-to-Phenotype Associations for Plant Morphology.

Mao Li1, Margaret H Frank1, Viktoriya Coneva1, Washington Mio2, Daniel H Chitwood3,4,5, Christopher N Topp6.   

Abstract

Efforts to understand the genetic and environmental conditioning of plant morphology are hindered by the lack of flexible and effective tools for quantifying morphology. Here, we demonstrate that persistent-homology-based topological methods can improve measurement of variation in leaf shape, serrations, and root architecture. We apply these methods to 2D images of leaves and root systems in field-grown plants of a domesticated introgression line population of tomato (Solanum pennellii). We find that compared with some commonly used conventional traits, (1) persistent-homology-based methods can more comprehensively capture morphological variation; (2) these techniques discriminate between genotypes with a larger normalized effect size and detect a greater number of unique quantitative trait loci (QTLs); (3) multivariate traits, whether statistically derived from univariate or persistent-homology-based traits, improve our ability to understand the genetic basis of phenotype; and (4) persistent-homology-based techniques detect unique QTLs compared to conventional traits or their multivariate derivatives, indicating that previously unmeasured aspects of morphology are now detectable. The QTL results further imply that genetic contributions to morphology can affect both the shoot and root, revealing a pleiotropic basis to natural variation in tomato. Persistent homology is a versatile framework to quantify plant morphology and developmental processes that complements and extends existing methods.
© 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29871979      PMCID: PMC6084663          DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  26 in total

1.  SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors.

Authors:  H Iwata; Y Ukai
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Resolving distinct genetic regulators of tomato leaf shape within a heteroblastic and ontogenetic context.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Aashish Ranjan; Ravi Kumar; Yasunori Ichihashi; Kristina Zumstein; Lauren R Headland; Enrique Ostria-Gallardo; José A Aguilar-Martínez; Susan Bush; Leonela Carriedo; Daniel Fulop; Ciera C Martinez; Jie Peng; Julin N Maloof; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Multivariate Analysis of Genotype-Phenotype Association.

Authors:  Philipp Mitteroecker; James M Cheverud; Mihaela Pavlicev
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Image-based high-throughput field phenotyping of crop roots.

Authors:  Alexander Bucksch; James Burridge; Larry M York; Abhiram Das; Eric Nord; Joshua S Weitz; Jonathan P Lynch
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  A quantitative genetic basis for leaf morphology in a set of precisely defined tomato introgression lines.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Ravi Kumar; Lauren R Headland; Aashish Ranjan; Michael F Covington; Yasunori Ichihashi; Daniel Fulop; José M Jiménez-Gómez; Jie Peng; Julin N Maloof; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture.

Authors:  Adam Conn; Ullas V Pedmale; Joanne Chory; Charles F Stevens; Saket Navlakha
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Imitation, genetic lineages, and time influenced the morphological evolution of the violin.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A morphometric analysis of vegetation patterns in dryland ecosystems.

Authors:  Luke Mander; Stefan C Dekker; Mao Li; Washington Mio; Surangi W Punyasena; Timothy M Lenton
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Digital imaging of root traits (DIRT): a high-throughput computing and collaboration platform for field-based root phenomics.

Authors:  Abhiram Das; Hannah Schneider; James Burridge; Ana Karine Martinez Ascanio; Tobias Wojciechowski; Christopher N Topp; Jonathan P Lynch; Joshua S Weitz; Alexander Bucksch
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 4.993

10.  Latent developmental and evolutionary shapes embedded within the grapevine leaf.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Laura L Klein; Regan O'Hanlon; Steven Chacko; Matthew Greg; Cassandra Kitchen; Allison J Miller; Jason P Londo
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 10.151

View more
  17 in total

1.  Multi-dimensional machine learning approaches for fruit shape phenotyping in strawberry.

Authors:  Mitchell J Feldmann; Michael A Hardigan; Randi A Famula; Cindy M López; Amy Tabb; Glenn S Cole; Steven J Knapp
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.524

2.  Specimen-based analysis of morphology and the environment in ecologically dominant grasses: the power of the herbarium.

Authors:  Christine A McAllister; Michael R McKain; Mao Li; Bess Bookout; Elizabeth A Kellogg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A Method to the Madness: Using Persistent Homology to Measure Plant Morphology.

Authors:  Emily R Larson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Functional Principal Component Analysis: A Robust Method for Time-Series Phenotypic Data.

Authors:  Yunqing Yu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Machine Learning Approaches to Improve Three Basic Plant Phenotyping Tasks Using Three-Dimensional Point Clouds.

Authors:  Illia Ziamtsov; Saket Navlakha
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Phenotyping Complex Plant Structures with a Large Format Industrial Scale High-Resolution X-Ray Tomography Instrument.

Authors:  Keith E Duncan; Christopher N Topp
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

7.  Detecting Carbon Nanotube Orientation with Topological Analysis of Scanning Electron Micrographs.

Authors:  Liyu Dong; Haibin Hang; Jin Gyu Park; Washington Mio; Richard Liang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 5.719

8.  Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake.

Authors:  Andrea Schnepf; Christopher K Black; Valentin Couvreur; Benjamin M Delory; Claude Doussan; Axelle Koch; Timo Koch; Mathieu Javaux; Magdalena Landl; Daniel Leitner; Guillaume Lobet; Trung Hieu Mai; Félicien Meunier; Lukas Petrich; Johannes A Postma; Eckart Priesack; Volker Schmidt; Jan Vanderborght; Harry Vereecken; Matthias Weber
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  The Quantitative Genetic Control of Root Architecture in Maize.

Authors:  Adam L Bray; Christopher N Topp
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.927

10.  Rootstock effects on scion phenotypes in a 'Chambourcin' experimental vineyard.

Authors:  Zoë Migicovsky; Zachary N Harris; Laura L Klein; Mao Li; Adam McDermaid; Daniel H Chitwood; Anne Fennell; Laszlo G Kovacs; Misha Kwasniewski; Jason P Londo; Qin Ma; Allison J Miller
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.