| Literature DB >> 29870982 |
Gensheng Zhang1, Qin Wang1, Wenwen Wang2, Minghua Yu2, Suping Zhang1, Nan Xu1, Suhan Zhou1, Xiaoyun Cao1, Xiaodong Fu3, Zufu Ma4, Ruisheng Liu5, Jianhua Mao1, En Yin Lai1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Free radical scavenger tempol is a protective antioxidant against ischemic injury. Tubular epithelial apoptosis is one of the main changes in the renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Meanwhile some proteins related with apoptosis and inflammation are also involved in renal I/R injury. We tested the hypothesis that tempol protects against renal I/R injury by activating protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PKB, Akt/mTOR) and glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) pathways as well as the coordinating apoptosis and inflammation related proteins.Entities:
Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Afferent arteriole; Ischemia/reperfusion; Tempol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29870982 PMCID: PMC6065105 DOI: 10.1159/000490338
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Blood Press Res ISSN: 1420-4096 Impact factor: 2.687
Fig. 1.The renal afferent arteriolar microperfusion.
Fig. 2.Effects of tempol on renal function after renal I/R injury. (A) Effects of tempol on serum creatinine after renal I/R injury. (B) Effects of tempol on serum BUN after renal I/R injury. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, (n=8), * p<0.05 vs sham group; # p<0.05 vs I/R group.
Fig. 3.Effects of tempol on oxidative stress induced by renal I/R injury. SOD, CAT and O2- in kidney were expressed as mean ± SEM, (n=8). * p<0.05 vs sham group; # p<0.05 vs I/R group.
Fig. 4.Effect of tempol on the morphologic changes of kidney tissues. PAS staining kidney sections were taken from sham group (A), I/R group (B) and I/R pretreated with tempol (50 mg/kg, C) and kidney injury was quantitatively measured by percentage of tubular necrosis in the cortex (D). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM, n=3, * p<0.05 vs sham group, # p <0.05 vs I/R group.
Fig. 5.Effect of tempol on the expression of Akt/mTOR and GSK3β pathways in I/R injury. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM, n=5, * p <0.05 vs sham group; # p <0.05 vs I/R group.
Fig. 6.Effect of tempol on the expression of apoptosis and inflammation pathways in renal I/R injury. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM, n=5, * p <0.05 vs sham group; # p <0.05 vs I/R group.
Fig. 7.Effect of tempol on the afferent arteriolar activity in renal I/R injury. A) The representative picture of microperfusion. Dose response curve for Ang II in three different groups. Arteriolar luminal diameters were given in μm (B) and contractive percent of the control diameter (C). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM, n=5, * p <0.05 vs sham group; # p <0.05 vs I/R group.