Literature DB >> 29870846

Patient-Specific Actual-Size Three-Dimensional Printed Models for Patient Education in Glioma Treatment: First Experiences.

Tom H van de Belt1, Hugo Nijmeijer2, David Grim2, Lucien J L P G Engelen2, Rinaldo Vreeken3, Marleen M H J van Gelder4, Mark Ter Laan5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer need high-quality information about disease stage, treatment options, and side effects. High-quality information can also improve health literacy, shared decision making, and satisfaction. We created patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) models of tumors including surrounding functional areas and assessed what patients with glioma value (or fear) about the models when they are used to educate them about the relationship between their tumor and specific brain parts, the surgical procedure, and risks.
METHODS: This exploratory study included adult patients with glioma who underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging as part of preoperative work-up. All participants received an actual-size 3D model printed based on functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging. Semistructured interviews were conducted to identify facilitators and barriers for using the model and perceived effects.
RESULTS: Models were successfully created for all 11 participants. There were 18 facilitators and 8 barriers identified. The model improved patients' understanding about their situation; patients reported that it was easier to ask their neurosurgeon questions based on their model and that it supported their decision about preferred treatment. A perceived barrier for using the 3D model was that it could be emotionally confronting, particularly in an early phase of the disease. Positive effects were related to psychological domains, including coping, learning effects, and communication.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific 3D models are promising and simple tools that could help patients with glioma better understand their situation, treatment options, and risks. These models have the potential to improve shared decision making.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Glioma; Patient education; Surgery; Treatment and risks

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29870846     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  11 in total

1.  Application of three-dimensional reconstruction and printing as an elective course for undergraduate medical students: an exploratory trial.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Zhang; Zhou Xu; Liwen Tan; Ying Li; Li Liu; Na Chen; Shaoxiang Zhang; Wouter H Lamers; Chunling Wu; Yi Wu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Development of a Patient Decision Aid to Support Shared Decision Making for Patients with Recurrent High-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Helle Sorensen von Essen; Frantz Rom Poulsen; Rikke Hedegaard Dahlrot; Karin Piil; Karina Dahl Steffensen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Development of a 3D-printed testicular cancer model for testicular examination education.

Authors:  Rebecca J Power; Jason Hearn; Charlie J Gillis; David Harvey; Christopher French; Michael Organ
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Patient education in Mohs surgery: a review and critical evaluation of techniques.

Authors:  Parth Patel; Kunal Malik; Amor Khachemoune
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.017

5.  The utility of 3-dimensional-printed models for skull base meningioma surgery.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Guo; Zhen-Qiang He; Hao Duan; Fu-Hua Lin; Guan-Hua Zhang; Xiang-Heng Zhang; Zheng-He Chen; Ke Sai; Xiao-Bing Jiang; Zhen-Ning Wang; Tian Xie; Zhong-Ping Chen; Yong-Gao Mou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

6.  Three-dimensional printing in radiation oncology: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael K Rooney; David M Rosenberg; Steve Braunstein; Adam Cunha; Antonio L Damato; Eric Ehler; Todd Pawlicki; James Robar; Ken Tatebe; Daniel W Golden
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 7.  Shared decision-making in neurosurgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Alba Corell; Annie Guo; Tomás Gómez Vecchio; Anneli Ozanne; Asgeir S Jakola
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 8.  Reforming support systems of newly diagnosed brain cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Loizidou; Viktoria Sefcikova; Justyna O Ekert; Matan Bone; George Samandouras
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 9.  The use of 3D-printed models in patient communication: a scoping review.

Authors:  Gemma Traynor; Andrew Iu Shearn; Elena G Milano; Maria Victoria Ordonez; Mari Nieves Velasco Forte; Massimo Caputo; Silvia Schievano; Hannah Mustard; Jo Wray; Giovanni Biglino
Journal:  J 3D Print Med       Date:  2022-01-19

Review 10.  The current and possible future role of 3D modelling within oesophagogastric surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Henry Robb; Gemma Scrimgeour; Piers Boshier; Anna Przedlacka; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Gina Brown; Fernando Bello; Christos Kontovounisios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.