| Literature DB >> 29869711 |
Rachel N Lord1, Victor Utomi2, David L Oxborough2, Bryony A Curry3, Megan Brown3, Keith P George2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The cardiac consequences of undertaking endurance exercise are the topic of recent debate. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on a growing body of literature, focusing on left ventricular (LV) function following prolonged endurance exercise over 2 h in duration which have employed novel techniques, including myocardial speckle tracking, to provide a more comprehensive global and regional assessment of LV mechanics.Entities:
Keywords: Echocardiography; Endurance exercise; Left ventricular mechanics
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29869711 PMCID: PMC6028893 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3906-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol ISSN: 1439-6319 Impact factor: 3.078
Fig. 1Outline of the search and filtration process for studies included in the meta-analysis
Study and participant demographics, training history and exercise stimulus detail
| Study | Male | Female | Age (years) | Distance (km) | Duration (min) | Exercise type | Training distance (km) | Training time (min) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banks et al. ( | 18 | 12 | 6 | 28 | 150 | High-intensity exercise | |||
| Banks et al. ( | 18 | 15 | 3 | 52 | 150 | High-intensity exercise | |||
| Chan Dewar et al. ( | 19 | 16 | 3 | 41 | 89 | 586 | Ultramarathon | 88 | |
| Cote et al. ( | 17 | 17 | 0 | 45 | 160 | 1740 | Run | 86 | |
| Cote et al. ( | 8 | 0 | 8 | 46 | 160 | 1554 | Run | 86 | |
| Dalla Vecchia et al. ( | 35 | 31 | 4 | 42 | 160 | Half marathon | |||
| Dawson et al. ( | 15 | 15 | 0 | 32 | 42 | 229 | Marathon | ||
| George et al. ( | 19 | 16 | 3 | 41 | 89 | 586 | Run | ||
| Hart et al. ( | 14 | 13 | 1 | 34 | 42 | 126 | Marathon | ||
| La Gerche et al. ( | 27 | 20 | 7 | 32 | 600 | Triathlon | 1152 | ||
| La Gerche et al. ( | 39 | 35 | 4 | 36 | 960 | ||||
| La Gerche et al. ( | 14 | 12 | 2 | 38 | 102 | ||||
| La Gerche et al. ( | 40 | 36 | 4 | 37 | Run/tri/cycle/ultra | ||||
| La Gerche et al. ( | 40 | 36 | 4 | 37 | Marathon, endurance triathlon, alpine cycling race and an ultra-triathlon | 978 | |||
| Lord et al. | 15 | 14 | 1 | 40 | 160 | Ultramarathon | 104 | ||
| Neilan et al. ( | 60 | 41 | 42 | 245 | Run | 67.2 | |||
| Nottin et al. ( | 23 | 23 | 0 | 40 | 840 | Triathlon | 720 | ||
| Oosthuyse et al. ( | 11 | 11 | 0 | 30 | Stimulated race cycling | 780 | |||
| Oxborough et al. ( | 17 | 17 | 0 | 33 | 42 | 209 | Marathon | ||
| Oxborough et al. ( | 16 | 12 | 4 | 42 | 161 | 1470 | Run | 104 | |
| Sahlen et al. ( | 15 | 15 | 0 | 62 | 30 | 199 | Cross-country race | 276 | |
| Scott et al. ( | 25 | 20 | 5 | 41 | 160 | 1530 | Ultramarathon | 786 | |
| Shave et al. ( | 15 | 14 | 1 | 32 | 42 | 213 | Marathon | ||
| Stewart et al. ( | 10 | 10 | 0 | 27 | 120 | 480 | |||
| Vitiello et al. ( | 21 | 21 | 0 | 40 | 166 | 2280 | Ultramarathon | ||
| Vitiello et al. ( | 16 | 16 | 0 | 23 | 180 | Cycling (ergometer) |
Fig. 2Exemplar funnel plots for (A) Ejection fraction and (B) longitudinal strain
Meta-analysis of LV functional parameters pre- and post-exercise endurance exercise (> 120 min)
| Parameter | Number of studies | Pre mean | Post mean | 95% CI | Heterogeneity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cochrane’s | |||||||||
| Systolic function | |||||||||
| HR (bpm) | 20 | 59 ± 1 (56 to 61) | 78 ± 2 (76 to 81) | 0.01 | 2 | 2–4 | 52 | 67 | 0.01 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 16 | 126 ± 2 (121 to 131) | 115 ± 3 (109 to 132) | 0.01 | − 1 | − 1.5 to − 0.6 | 30 | 73 | 0.01 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 11 | 74 ± 1 (72 to 76) | 71 ± 2 (68 to 75) | 0.01 | − 0.5 | − 0.8 to 0.3 | 4 | 0 | 0.5 |
| LVEDV | 13 | 125 ± 11 (104 to 147) | 117 ± 11 (95 to 138) | 0.01 | − 0.5 | − 0.8 to − 0.3 | 17 | 28 | 0.2 |
| EF (%) | 17 | 63 ± 1.0 (62 to 65) | 60 ± 1.0 (58 to 62) | 0.01 | − 0.8 | − 1.2 to − 0.5 | 74 | 78 | 0.01 |
| | 5 | 9.5 ± 0.8 (7.8 to 1.1) | 9.7 ± 0.9 (7.9 to 11.4) | 0.08 | − 0.7 | − 1 to − 0.4 | 2 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Longitudinal strain (%) | 22 | − 18 ± 1 (− 19 to − 17) | − 17 ± 1 (− 18 to − 16) | 0.01 | − 0.9 | − 1 to − 0.5 | 44 | 77 | 0.1 |
| Long SSR (l s−1) | 10 | − 0.99 ± 0.03 (− 1.04 to − 0.90) | − 1.01 ± 0.03 (− 1.07 to − 0.96) | 0.01 | − 0.9 | − 1.3 to − 0.5 | 44 | 77 | 0.01 |
| Circumferential strain (%) | 4 | − 19.2 ± 1.1 (− 21.4 to − 17.0) | − 17.8 ± 1.1 (− 19.9 to − 15.7) | 0.2 | − 1.1 | − 2.8 to 0.5 | 42 | 93 | 0.01 |
| Radial strain (%) | 4 | 27.4 ± 13.0 (1.8 to 53.0) | 11.2 ± 16.8 (− 21.8 to 44.2) | 0.07 | − 1 | − 2.5 to 0.1 | 28 | 89 | 0.04 |
| Twist (o) | 5 | 11.9 ± 2.2 (7.7 to 16.2) | 8.7 ± 2.2 (4.5 to 13.0) | 0.01 | − 1 | − 1.6 to − 0.3 | 19 | 78 | 0.01 |
| Diastolic function | |||||||||
| | 9 | 0.8 ± 0.02 (0.7 to 0.8) | 0.7 ± 0.02 (0.6 to 0.7) | 0.01 | − 1 | − 1.4 to − 0.6 | 50 | 74 | 0.01 |
| | 14 | 0.5 ± 0.02 (0.5 to 0.5) | 0.6 ± 0.02 (0.5 to 0.6) | 0.01 | − 0.6 | − 0.9 to − 0.2 | 49 | 73 | 0.01 |
| 18 | 1.6 ± 0.1 (1.5 to 1.7) | 1.3 ± 0.1 (1.2 to 1.4) | 0.01 | − 1.1 | − 1. to − 0.8 | 59 | 71 | 0.01 | |
| 14 | 10 ± 1 (9 to 11) | 9 ± 1 (8 to 11) | 0.01 | − 0.7 | − 1 to − 0.5 | 15 | 39 | 0.1 | |
HR heart rate, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, EF Ejection fraction, SSR strain rate in systole, E early diastolic transmitral blood flow velocity, A late diastolic transmitral blood flow velocity, E/A ratio of early to late diastolic transmitral blood flow velocity, E′ early diastolic myocardial tissue velocity, P value < 0.05,d Cohen’s standardised difference in means/effect sizes, I (%) tau squared, CI confidence interval