| Literature DB >> 29869004 |
Hella Hultin1, Katharina Stevens1, Magnus Sundbom2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: By treating obesity, one of the major epidemics of this past century, through bariatric surgery, we may cause complications due to malnourishment in a growing population. At present, vitamin D deficiency is of interest, especially in patients with inferior absorption of fat-soluble nutrients after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS).Entities:
Keywords: Biliopancreatic diversion; Cholecalciferol; Duodenal switch; Hypovitaminosis D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29869004 PMCID: PMC6153578 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3307-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obes Surg ISSN: 0960-8923 Impact factor: 4.129
Demographics of the patient population at time of entry into the study, i.e., baseline. Data is presented as a percentage of the total and median values (interquartile range)
| Injection group ( | Control group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| % female | 61.5% | 72.7% | 0.88 |
| Age (years) | 42.0 (7.0) | 38.0 (8.0) | 0.71 |
| Years postop | 4.2 (1.7) | 4.9 (1.8) | 0.15 |
| Preop BMI (kg/m2) | 54.5 (4.6) | 54.9 (2.4) | 0.60 |
| BMI at study (kg/m2) | 33.1 (5.2) | 35.0 (8.6) | 0.66 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 36.0 (5.5) | 37.0 (3.0) | 0.88 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 58.0 (13.5) | 56.0 (12.0) | 0.82 |
The p value is calculated using the Mann-Whitney non-parametric U test
Effect of a single cholecalciferol injection on 25[OH] vitamin D, PTH, and calcium from baseline to 6 months
| Baseline ( | 1 month ( | 3 months ( | 6 months ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25[OH]D (nmol/l) | ||||
| Injection group | 19.3(9.3) | 65.4 (6.3) | 66.6 (11.0) | 67.4 (16.1) |
| Controls | 23.2 (22.5) | 29.2 (13.4) | 24.0 (23.0) | 29.2 (31.4) |
| | 0.30 | < 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Intact PTH (pmol/l) | ||||
| Injection group | 12.3 (9.9) | 6.4 (2.1) | 7.3 (4.0) | 9.6 (6.2) |
| Controls | 9.5 (6.8) | 8.5 (4.3) | 8.4 (2.4) | 9.1 (1.8) |
| | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.90 |
| Calcium (mmol/l) | ||||
| Injection group | 2.2(0.14) | 2.18 (0.13) | 2.22 (0.13) | 2.19 (0.06) |
| Controls | 2.2 (0.10) | 2.20 (0.20) | 2.20 (0.20) | 2.20 (0.10) |
| | 0.33 | 0.40 | 0.84 | 1.0 |
Data is presented as median value (interquartile range) and was compared to the Mann-Whitney non-parametric U test
Fig. 1The changes in 25[OH]D and PTH levels for all patients in the two groups