Literature DB >> 29868877

Effect of Increased Inpatient Attending Physician Supervision on Medical Errors, Patient Safety, and Resident Education: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kathleen M Finn1, Joshua P Metlay1, Yuchiao Chang1, Amulya Nagarur1, Shaun Yang1, Christopher P Landrigan2,3, Christiana Iyasere1.   

Abstract

Importance: While the relationship between resident work hours and patient safety has been extensively studied, little research has evaluated the role of attending physician supervision on patient safety. Objective: To determine the effect of increased attending physician supervision on an inpatient resident general medical service on patient safety and educational outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 9-month randomized clinical trial performed on an inpatient general medical service of a large academic medical center used a crossover design. Participants were clinical teaching attending physicians and residents in an internal medicine residency program. Interventions: Twenty-two faculty provided either (1) increased direct supervision in which attending physicians joined work rounds on previously admitted patients or (2) standard supervision in which attending physicians were available but did not join work rounds. Each faculty member participated in both arms in random order. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary safety outcome was rate of medical errors. Resident education was evaluated via a time-motion study to assess resident participation on rounds and via surveys to measure resident and attending physician educational ratings.
Results: Of the 22 attending physicians, 8 (36%) were women, with 15 (68%) having more than 5 years of experience. A total of 1259 patients (5772 patient-days) were included in the analysis. The medical error rate was not significantly different between standard vs increased supervision (107.6; 95% CI, 85.8-133.7 vs 91.1; 95% CI, 76.9-104.0 per 1000 patient-days; P = .21). Time-motion analysis of 161 work rounds found no difference in mean length of time spent discussing established patients in the 2 models (202; 95% CI, 192-212 vs 202; 95% CI, 189-215 minutes; P = .99). Interns spoke less when an attending physician joined rounds (64; 95% CI, 60-68 vs 55; 95% CI, 49-60 minutes; P = .008). In surveys, interns reported feeling less efficient (41 [55%] vs 68 [73%]; P = .02) and less autonomous (53 [72%] vs 86 [91%]; P = .001) with an attending physician present and residents felt less autonomous (11 [58%] vs 30 [97%]; P < .001). Conversely, attending physicians rated the quality of care higher when they participated on work rounds (20 [100%] vs 16 [80%]; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: Increased direct attending physician supervision did not significantly reduce the medical error rate. In designing morning work rounds, residency programs should reconsider their balance of patient safety, learning needs, and resident autonomy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03318198.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29868877      PMCID: PMC6145715          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  40 in total

1.  Using chart review to screen for medication errors and adverse drug events.

Authors:  Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 2.637

2.  Can residents learn to be good doctors without harming patients?

Authors:  Kevin T Hinchey; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Resident uncertainty in clinical decision making and impact on patient care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  J M Farnan; J K Johnson; D O Meltzer; H J Humphrey; V M Arora
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2008-04

4.  Resident supervision in the operating room: does this impact on outcome?

Authors:  W F Fallon; R L Wears; J J Tepas
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1993-10

5.  Nighttime intensivist staffing and mortality among critically ill patients.

Authors:  David J Wallace; Derek C Angus; Amber E Barnato; Andrew A Kramer; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  On-site Night Float by Attending Physicians: A Model to Improve Resident Education and Patient Care.

Authors:  Andrew Paul Defilippis; Ildefonso Tellez; Neil Winawer; Lorenzo Di Francesco; Kimberly D Manning; Sunil Kripalani
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-03

7.  How residents view their clinical supervision: a reanalysis of classic national survey data.

Authors:  DeWitt C Baldwin; Steven R Daugherty; Patrick M Ryan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-03

8.  Surgical resident supervision in the operating room and outcomes of care in Veterans Affairs hospitals.

Authors:  Kamal M F Itani; Ralph G DePalma; Tracy Schifftner; Karen M Sanders; Barbara K Chang; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Supervision in the outpatient clinic: effects on teaching and patient care.

Authors:  V M Gennis; M A Gennis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Clinical oversight: conceptualizing the relationship between supervision and safety.

Authors:  Tara J T Kennedy; Lorelei Lingard; G Ross Baker; Lisa Kitchen; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  13 in total

1.  Assessment of family medicine residents.

Authors:  Roger Ladouceur
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The impact of different models of resident supervision on patient safety and resident education.

Authors:  Marco Barchiesi; Federica Leidi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  The Teacher, the Assessor, and the Patient Protector: A Conceptual Model Describing How Context Interfaces With the Supervisory Roles of Academic Emergency Physicians.

Authors:  Shelly-Anne Li; Anita Acai; Jonathan Sherbino; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-01-26

4.  Barriers to Accessing Nighttime Supervisors: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Jillian S Catalanotti; Alec B O'Connor; Michael Kisielewski; Davoren A Chick; Kathlyn E Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Supervision and autonomy of ophthalmology residents in the outpatient clinic in the United States II: a survey of senior residents.

Authors:  Eric L Singman; Michael V Boland; Jing Tian; Laura K Green; Divya Srikumaran
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Knowledge and Confidence of Final-Year Medical Students Regarding Critical Care Core-Concepts, a Comparison between Problem-Based Learning and a Traditional Curriculum.

Authors:  Mariam Al Ansari; Ali Al Bshabshe; Hadil Al Otair; Layla Layqah; Abdullah Al-Roqi; Emad Masuadi; Nawaf Alkharashi; Salim Baharoon
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2021-03-23

7.  Supervision and Care Quality as Perceived by Redeployed Attendings, Fellows, and Residents During a COVID-19 Surge: Lessons for the Future.

Authors:  John Q Young; Karen A Friedman; Krima Thakker; Marije P Hennus; Martina Hennessy; Aileen Patterson; Andrew Yacht; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 7.840

8.  The impact of COVID-19 on clinical education of internal medicine trainees.

Authors:  Brian Gaffney; Orla O'Carroll; Finbarr Conroy; Marcus W Butler; Michael P Keane; Cormac McCarthy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Development and Effectiveness of a Patient Safety Education Program for Inpatients.

Authors:  Sun Hwa Shin; Mi Jung Kim; Ho Jin Moon; Eun Hye Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Use of Virtual Reality for Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Simulation.

Authors:  Bradford H Ralston; Renee C Willett; Srihari Namperumal; Nina M Brown; Heather Walsh; Ricardo A Muñoz; Sylvia Del Castillo; Todd P Chang; Gregory K Yurasek
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.