BACKGROUND: In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education instituted common duty hour limits, and in 2008 the Institute of Medicine recommended additional limits on continuous duty hours. Using a night-float system is an accepted approach for adhering to duty hour mandates. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of an on-site night-float attending physician on resident education and patient care. METHODS: Night-float residents and daytime ward residents were surveyed at the end of their rotation about the impact of an on-site night-float attending physician on education and quality of patient care. Responses were provided on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1, strongly agree, to 5, strongly disagree. RESULTS: Overall, 92 of the 140 distributed surveys were completed (66% response rate). Night-float residents found the night-float attending physician to be helpful with cross-cover issues (mean = 2.00), initial history and physical examination (mean = 1.56), choosing appropriate diagnostic tests (mean = 1.79), developing a treatment plan (mean = 1.74), and improving overall patient care (mean = 1.91). Daytime ward residents were very satisfied with the quality of the admission workups (mean = 1.78), tests and diagnostic procedures (mean = 1.76), and initial treatment plan (mean = 1.62) provided by the night-float service. CONCLUSION: A night-float system that includes on-site attending physician supervision can provide a valuable opportunity for resident education and may help improve the quality of patient care.
BACKGROUND: In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education instituted common duty hour limits, and in 2008 the Institute of Medicine recommended additional limits on continuous duty hours. Using a night-float system is an accepted approach for adhering to duty hour mandates. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of an on-site night-float attending physician on resident education and patient care. METHODS: Night-float residents and daytime ward residents were surveyed at the end of their rotation about the impact of an on-site night-float attending physician on education and quality of patient care. Responses were provided on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1, strongly agree, to 5, strongly disagree. RESULTS: Overall, 92 of the 140 distributed surveys were completed (66% response rate). Night-float residents found the night-float attending physician to be helpful with cross-cover issues (mean = 2.00), initial history and physical examination (mean = 1.56), choosing appropriate diagnostic tests (mean = 1.79), developing a treatment plan (mean = 1.74), and improving overall patient care (mean = 1.91). Daytime ward residents were very satisfied with the quality of the admission workups (mean = 1.78), tests and diagnostic procedures (mean = 1.76), and initial treatment plan (mean = 1.62) provided by the night-float service. CONCLUSION: A night-float system that includes on-site attending physician supervision can provide a valuable opportunity for resident education and may help improve the quality of patient care.
Authors: Darcy A Reed; Rachel B Levine; Redonda G Miller; Bimal H Ashar; Eric B Bass; Tasha N Rice; Joseph Cofrancesco Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-07-23
Authors: Jessica R Golbus; David A Manly; Katherine A Wonneberger; Thomas C Hanff; Kathleen M Murphy; Daniel S Wang; Steven G McKee; Lisa Bellini Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2015-09
Authors: Benny Kai Guo Loo; Chew Lip Ng; Run Ting Chin; Lucy Jennifer Davies; Jin Yong; Andrea Ee Ling Ang; Yeh Woei Chong; Paul Ananth Tambyah Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.858
Authors: Steven K Polevoi; J Jewel Shim; Charles E McCulloch; Barbara Grimes; Prasanthi Govindarajan Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Brian T Ragel; Mark Piedra; Paul Klimo; Kim J Burchiel; Heidi Waldo; Shirley McCartney; Nathan R Selden Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2014-06
Authors: Kathleen M Finn; Joshua P Metlay; Yuchiao Chang; Amulya Nagarur; Shaun Yang; Christopher P Landrigan; Christiana Iyasere Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 21.873