| Literature DB >> 29868605 |
Priya Kalra1, Abhijeet Dhiman1,2, William C Cho3, John G Bruno4, Tarun K Sharma5,6.
Abstract
Aptamers are structured nucleic acid molecules that can bind to their targets with high affinity and specificity. However, conventional SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment) methods may not necessarily produce aptamers of desired affinity and specificity. Thus, to address these questions, this perspective is intended to suggest some approaches and tips along with novel selection methods to enhance evolution of aptamers. This perspective covers latest novel innovations as well as a broad range of well-established approaches to improve the individual binding parameters (aptamer affinity, avidity, specificity and/or selectivity) of aptamers during and/or post-SELEX. The advantages and limitations of individual aptamer selection methods and post-SELEX optimizations, along with rational approaches to overcome these limitations are elucidated in each case. Further the impact of chosen selection milieus, linker-systems, aptamer cocktails and detection modules utilized in conjunction with target-specific aptamers, on the overall assay performance are discussed in detail, each with its own advantages and limitations. The simple variations suggested are easily available for facile implementation during and/or post-SELEX to develop ultrasensitive and specific assays. Finally, success studies of established aptamer-based assays are discussed, highlighting how they utilized some of the suggested methodologies to develop commercially successful point-of-care diagnostic assays.Entities:
Keywords: Kd; SELEX; affinity; aptamers; limit of detection; selectivity; sensitivity; specificity
Year: 2018 PMID: 29868605 PMCID: PMC5966647 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Biosci ISSN: 2296-889X
Innovations to generate high affinity aptamers.
| 1. |
|
Part of artificially expanded genetic information system (AEGIS); Synthetic alternate to natural nucleic acids DNA and RNA; function as biopolymers with applications in xenobiology (Pinheiro and Holliger, AEGIS-SELEX evolved XNA aptamer with non-standard P,Z nucleotides showing high affinity (nM Kd) toward breast cancer cell line (Sefah et al., |
|
|
13 “difficult” human proteins that failed unmodified DNA SELEX, yielded high affinity (nM Kd) slow off-rate aptamers using modified DNA libraries (Gold et al., High affinity ultrasensitive detection of analytes with 1 pM−50 fM limit of detection (Brody et al., | |
|
|
Replacement of purine nucleotides in the avidin-binding aptamer with LNAs, enhanced aptamer binding affinity by 8.5 folds (Hernandez et al., | |
|
|
5′-BzdU modified nucleolin AS1411 aptamer demonstrated higher binding affinity to cancerous cells than unmodified aptamer (Lee et al., Phosphorodithioate (PS2) substitution on single nucleotide of α-thrombin specific RNA aptamer enhances binding affinity by ~1000 folds (Zandarashvili et al., | |
| 2. |
|
A bivalent aptamer constructed by connecting two identical 3R02 aptamers (300 pM Kd) via a 10-mer thymine linker demonstrated 10 folds higher binding (30 pM Kd) to VEGF than the monomer (Nonaka et al., Joining two established α-thrombin specific 15-mer and 29-mer aptamers using a flexible PEG-phosphoramidite linker, enhanced binding affinity of bivalent aptamer by 97 folds over, the individual monomers (Tian and Heyduk, Bivalent aptamer having two 15-mer thrombin specific aptamers joined by a 35-mer random region from DNA library was isolated by evolution strategy and showed >200 folds higher affinity (<10 pM Kd) than the 15-mer monomer (Ahmad et al., |
| 3. |
|
Truncated 14 nt transferrin receptor specific aptamer demonstrated 6 folds higher affinity than the 50 nt parent aptamer (Macdonald et al., Truncated VEa5 aptamer exhibits >200 fold higher binding affinity to VEGF (Kaur and Yung, |
| 4. |
|
Utilizes bead-based selection approach, bypasses the need for enzyme amplification, therefore shows high compatibility with unlimited functional groups to generate X-aptamers of nM affinity in a single round (He et al., |
| 5. |
|
NECEEM efficiently partitions aptamer-target complexes based on binding parameters (Kd, |
| 6. |
|
MARAS protocol utilizes magnetic beads and optimized amounts of externally applied rotating magnetic fields for selection of ultrasensitive aptamers having low nM Kd, without the need for iterative selection. Method is also compatible with primer-free libraries unlike conventional SELEX (Lai and Hong, |
| 7. |
|
Cho et al. ( |
| 8. |
|
Utilization of Bioinformatics tools in combination with established |
|
|
Combines microarray approach with the identification and evolution of sequences by | |
|
|
Enriched sequences with aptamer families are utilized to evolve aptamer motifs, which were screened by Microarray to evolve ~10-folds higher affinity PfLDH aptamers (Kinghorn et al., |
Figure 1Illustration of a cancer biomarker (ERK2) aptamer pull-down assay on aptamer-coated magnetic beads (MBs) performed in serum and analyzed by gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. The “clean” ~43.5 kD ERK2 band shown in the gel and clear mass spectral signature virtually free of interfering signals from serum were likely due to original aptamer selection in diluted serum as well as the addition of 2 mM EDTA to chelate free calcium ions, thereby enhancing aptamer specificity (Bruno, 2017b). Anti-ERK2 aptamers are shown as wavy red lines attached to MBs either covalently or via streptavidin-biotin linkages which then capture any free extant ERK2 or spiked recombinant ERK2 (rERK2) in serum samples. Following MB collection with a strong permanent magnet (pull-down), removal of serum, several buffer washes and elution of the ERK2 from the aptamer MBs in strong (0.1 M) HCl, followed by removal of the aptamer-MBs and neutralization of ERK2 in the acid with 0.1 M NaOH, the resultant eluate is electrophoresed in polyacrylamide and analyzed by mass spectrometry to validate its molecular weight (MW) and probable identity. A real experimental Coomassie Blue-stained 12% polyacrylamide gel and mass spectrum are shown from experimental pull-down assay runs.
Figure 2Comparison of relative sensitivities, turnaround time and cost of various Kd estimation techniques. Kd, Apparent dissociation constant (Molar); UV-Vis, Ultraviolet-Visible; ALISA, Aptamer-linked immobilized sorbent assay; ELONA, Enzyme-linked oligonucleotide sorbent assay; ELASA, Enzyme-linked aptamer sorbent assay.
Figure 3Utility of aptamer cocktail in enhancing signal detection. Schematic concept of signal enhancement by aptamer cocktails for microbial cell detection and increase in fluorescence intensity of bacterial cell suspensions by the interaction with single aptamers or aptamer cocktails.
Figure 4Identification of two candidate aptamers which were selected to bind Listeria monocytogenes specific peptide epitope (QQQTAPKAPTE). Top—initial ELISA-like (ELASA) screening assay results, which identified p60 29R and 34F as the best or highest affinity aptamers for binding to the peptide. Bottom—ELASA results for these two aptamers vs. a variety of Listeria species. Both aptamers exhibited a preference for binding to immobilized L. monocyogenes whole viable cells. Bar heights and error bars represent the Means ± 2 Standard Deviations of six independent ELASA readings (Bruno and Sivils, 2017).
Figure 5Results of initial YASARA-based 3-D molecular modeling to identify where the PSA variant isoleucine (I) vs. threonine (T) peptide regions bound to the candidate aptamer. Top—trace models of the aptamer docked with the two variant PSA peptides reveal binding to the same loop structure. Bottom−3-D space-filling ball models of the same binding events. Peptides are encircled in each case to distinguish their locations within the loop structure designated Loop 1 in the docked aptamer-ligand complexes.
Figure 6Close up views of the top PSA aptamer binding to both, the I and T peptide variants. This tube structure docking analysis revealed the presence of a common proximal adenine in the aptamer binding site as indicated by arrows directly across from the indicated isoleucine (I) or threonine (T), which could be replaced by a diaminopurine (DAP) base to alter binding in the region and potentially discriminate the I- vs. T-PSA peptide variants.
Figure 7ELASA results demonstrating differential binding of the DAP-modified aptamer to the PSA variant peptides. The DAP-modified aptamer demonstrated ~ 20% greater affinity for the PSA-isoleucine (I) vs. the PSA-threonine (T) variant. Bar heights and error bars represent the Means ± 2 Standard Deviations of four independent enzyme-linked (ELASA) absorbance at 405 nm.