| Literature DB >> 29867730 |
Finn Lennartsson1,2, Maria Nilsson3, Olof Flodmark1,2, Lena Jacobson4, Jonas Larsson5.
Abstract
Injuries to the immature optic radiation (OR) are associated with thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer and corresponding visual field (VF) defects. The aim of the current study was to seek evidence for causal retrograde trans-synaptic degeneration by exploring the correspondence between the localization and extension of the injury to the OR and the structure of the macular ganglion cell complex, and the relation to VF function. Seven adults (age range 18-35) with visual dysfunction secondary to white-matter damage of immaturity and six healthy adults (age range 22-33) underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fiber tractography was used to generate the geniculate projections to the dorsal and ventral striate cortex, delineated by retinotopic functional MRI mapping. The structure of the macular ganglion cell complex was measured with optical coherence tomography. The tractography showed overlaps between the dorsal and ventral geniculo-striate projections. However, in four patients with inferior VF defects, the dorsal projections were to a large extent traversing the space normally solely occupied by ventral projections. This is consistent with structural changes to the OR and suggests of re-organization upon injury. Diffusion parameters were significantly different between patients and controls, and most pronounced in the dorsal geniculo-striate projections, with a pattern indicating primary injury. The macular ganglion cell complex was significantly thinner in the patients and most pronounced in the superior sectors; a pattern particularly evident in the four patients with inferior VF defects. The ratio of the mean thickness of the macular ganglion cell complex in the superior and inferior sectors significantly correlated with the axial and mean diffusivities in the contra- and ipsilateral dorsal striate projections. The results suggest a causal link between injuries to the superior portion of the immature OR and secondary thinning in the macular ganglion cell complex, resulting in inferior VF defects.Entities:
Keywords: fiber tractography; optic radiation; optical coherence tomography; prematurity; retinal ganglion cell layer; retrograde trans-synaptic degeneration; visual fields
Year: 2018 PMID: 29867730 PMCID: PMC5950728 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Fiber tractography of the optic radiation (OR). Overview of the complete fiber tracking procedure of the OR illustrated in one patient (Subject F). This patient had normal OR on fiber tractography and normal GCL_IPL thickness on OCT, and no visual field defects. Upper row: (A) definition of V1d- and V1v-ROIs from the retinotopic fMRI activation maps on cortical flattened 3D-T1w maps. (B) The left side’s V1d- (pink) and V1v-ROI (turquoise) mapped on a 3D-T1w image in sagittal midline section around the calcarine sulcus. Lower row: fiber tracts for OR-V1d (pink) and OR-V1v (turquoise) overlaid on 3D-T1w image in (C) an axial, (D) a parasagittal (only tracts on left side), and (E) a coronal section at the level of the trigone [dotted blue line in (B)]. Note the spatial overlap between the OR-V1d and OR-V1v tracts along their course. Abbreviations: R, right; L, left; H/VM, horizontal/vertical meridian.
Figure 2Comparison of the spatial distribution of streamlines in the OR, the GCL_IPL measurements and the VF maps. Spatial distribution of streamlines in the OR-V1d (pink) and OR-V1v (turquoise) tracts for patients. (A) Subject A, (B) Subject C, and (C) Subject G and their corresponding GCL_IPL measurements and visual field (VF) maps. Left column: tracts overlaid on 3D-T1w images in a coronal section at the level of the trigone. Right column: maps of the macular GCL_IPL thickness topography with yellow indicating minor thinning and red more severe thinning. The ratios of the average GCL_IPL thickness in superior and inferior sectors are inserted. VF maps assessed with Humphrey field analyser. The grayscale runs from white to black, with more intense darkness illustrating deeper sensitivity reduction. Grayscale printouts illustrate the reduced sensitivity in the inferior hemifield, typical for this study group. Note the topographical correspondence between the spatial displacement of the OR-V1d tract into the space occupied by the OR-VRv tract in (A) Subject A and (B) Subject C and the relative thinning of superior sectors of the GCL_IPL and inferior VF defects. This is not the case in (C) Subject G. Despite having a large white-matter damage of immaturity [bilateral intra-ventricular hemorrhage (L > R) and right-sided periventricular hemorrhagic infarct (36)], the primary visual system is not affected in this patient. Abbreviations: R, right; L, left.
Tract parameters and the spatial overlap for the OR tracts.
| Side | Tract | FA | MD | D// | D⊥ | AFD connectivity | Spatial overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | Left | OR-V1d | 0.49 (0.46–0.54) | 6.65 (6.38–8.79) | 10.97 (10.03–13.62) | 4.66 (4.16–6.38) | 11.36 (9.46–13.34) | 0.69 (0.56–0.74) |
| OR-V1 | 0.49 (0.46–0.55) | 6.72 (6.50–9.05) | 11.16 (10.04–14.00) | 4.70 (4.21–6.57) | 12.02 (10.46–14.59) | |||
| OR-V1v | 0.49 (0.44–0.55) | 6.79 (6.58–9.29) | 11.32 (10.04–14.34) | 4.74 (4.27–6.77) | 11.00 (8.89–13.83) | |||
| Right | OR-V1d | 0.49 (0.45–0.55) | 6.59 (6.39–7.76) | 10.60 (9.93–12.57) | 4.69 (4.13–5.35) | 12.41 (10.81–17.56) | 0.64 (0.51–0.68) | |
| OR-V1 | 0.49 (0.46–0.56) | 6.63 (6.48–8.04) | 10.79 (10.17–13.03) | 4.72 (4.15–5.54) | 13.67 (12.54–19.37) | |||
| OR-V1v | 0.50 (0.47–0.56) | 6.67 (6.56–8.29) | 10.98 (10.41–13.44) | 4.73 (4.18–5.71) | 12.41 (10.46–17.49) | |||
| Patients | Left | OR-V1d | 0.45 (0.38–0.51) | 8.87 (8.00–10.32) | 13.27 (12.08–14.59) | 6.52 (5.65–8.18) | 9.88 (5.41–10.09) | 0.79 (0.56–0.83) |
| OR-V1 | 0.45 (0.39–0.51) | 8.92 (8.03–10.29) | 13.54 (12.10–14.65) | 6.76 (5.90–8.11) | 10.34 (5.83–11.18) | |||
| OR-V1v | 0.45 (0.39–0.52) | 8.70 (8.06–10.49) | 13.80 (12.11–15.52) | 6.49 (6.04–8.04) | 7.67 (5.47–10.35) | |||
| Right | OR-V1d | 0.44 (0.38–0.52) | 8.80 (7.21–9.70) | 12.88 (11.72–13.99) | 6.68 (4.94–7.63) | 10.51 (6.38–11.36) | 0.71 (0.59–0.83) | |
| OR-V1 | 0.44 (0.39–0.53) | 8.68 (7.33–9.61) | 12.95 (12.04–14.11) | 6.50 (4.98–7.48) | 11.07 (6.79–13.18) | |||
| OR-V1v | 0.45 (0.40–0.53) | 8.64 (7.45–9.92) | 13.03 (12.29–14.60) | 6.44 (5.02–7.58) | 9.01 (6.57–11.48) | |||
Measurements by side (left/right), summarized as median and range (min–max) for all controls and all patients in the different OR tracts. OR tracts are indexed as projections to the V1-area or its part dorsal part above (V1d) and ventral part below (V1v) the horizontal meridian. FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; D.
.
.
Figure 3Relationship between the GCL_IPL thickness and diffusion parameters in the OR-V1d tracts. The ratio of the average GCL_IPL thickness in superior and inferior sectors in each eye for patients (diamonds) and controls (circles) plotted against (A) mean diffusivity MD, (B) axial diffusivity (D//), (C) radial diffusivity (D⊥), (D) fractional anisotropy (FA), and (E) apparent fiber density (AFD) connectivity in the ipsilateral OR-V1d tract, as well as against the (F) spatial overlap between the ipsilateral OR-V1d and OR-V1v tracts. Data are color-coded for each patient (Subjects A–G). Diffusivity in unit 10−4 mm2/s. AFD connectivity in arbitrary unit. Spatial overlap given as the Cohen’s kappa coefficient (47).
The GCL_ILP thickness in the eyes of patient and controls.
| Subject/sex/year born | Side | Average in superior sectors | Average in inferior sectors | Ratio of averages in superior and inferior sectors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | Left | 80.35 (70–97) | 79.85 (70.3–96) | 1.005 (0.97–1.04) |
| Right | 80.5 (68.7–94.3) | 82 (71.7–95.3) | 0.995 (0.96–1.01) | |
| A/M/1977 | Left | 55.7 | 61.3 | 0.91 |
| Right | 54 | 61.7 | 0.88 | |
| B/F/1993 | Left | 68.7 | 74.7 | 0.92 |
| Right | 64.3 | 73 | 0.88 | |
| C/F/1989 | Left | 60.7 | 67.7 | 0.9 |
| Right | 62 | 67.3 | 0.92 | |
| D/F/1988 | Left | 62.7 | 71.3 | 0.88 |
| Right | 67.3 | 75.3 | 0.89 | |
| E/F/1985 | Left | 62.7 | 64.7 | 0.97 |
| Right | 65.7 | 68.7 | 0.96 | |
| G/F/1995 | Left | 78.3 | 78 | 1 |
| Right | 77.3 | 80 | 0.97 | |
| F/M/1991 | Left | 83.7 | 83.3 | 1 |
| Right | 80 | 81 | 0.99 |
The GCL_ILP thickness (in micrometers) is given as the mean value of the measurements in the superior and inferior sectors for each eye and as their corresponding ratio. This is indicated by side (left/right) for each patient (Subjects A–G) and as the range in controls [median (min–max)].
.