| Literature DB >> 26941619 |
Lotfi B Merabet1, Kathryn J Devaney2, Corinna M Bauer1, Aparna Panja2, Gena Heidary3, David C Somers2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: cortical/cerebral visual impairment; diffusion MRI; functional MRI; optic radiations; perimetry; tractography; visual cortex; visual field
Year: 2016 PMID: 26941619 PMCID: PMC4766290 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Syst Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5137
Figure 1(A) Visual field assessment of CVI patient obtained by Humphrey automated visual perimetry (see text for test details). A bilateral field defect involving the inferior visual fields (with a more dense defect involving the left side) in each eye evident on the gray scale plot (top panel) and confirmed on the pattern deviation plot (bottom panel). (B) Axial T1-weighted MRI images (MP-RAGE pulse sequence) in a normally sighted control (top panel) and CVI patient (lower panel). Enlarged lateral ventricles with irregular posterior borders are apparent in the CVI patient (black arrow). (C) Corresponding white matter tractography of the optic radiations (sagittal view) revealed with HARDI in the same individuals. Note in the control subject, the complete arborization of the superior and inferior banks of the optic radiations extending from the thalamus to the occipital cortex in both hemispheres (open arrows). In contrast, the CVI patient shows markedly fewer projections and in particular, along the superior bank of the optic radiations (white arrows). The paucity of connections along the superior bank along with a greater deficit of connections in the right (R) compared to the left (L) hemisphere correspond to the location of the visual field deficit of the CVI patient characterized by automated perimetry.
Figure 2Activation of early retinotopic areas using fMRI. (A) Cortical flattening of an occipital cortical patch from the right hemisphere of a normally sighted control. For reference, colored dashed lines are in the same position in both the inflated and flattened views (orange, calcarine sulcus; red, lateral occipital; green, medial, dorsal occipital; and blue, medial ventral occipital). The boundaries of early visual areas (V1–V3) are shown and separated in dorsal (d) and ventral (v) parts. (B) Occipital patch projections showing cortical activation in the control (upper panel) and CVI patient (lower panel) in response to visual stimulation using meridians as well as upper and lower wedges (blue and yellow colors correspond to location of activation in response to visual stimulation). Overall, the organization of early visual areas appears largely intact in the CVI patient. However, selectivity for stimulation within the lower visual field was reduced compared to the sighted control (note the left hemisphere is flipped for easier visual comparison). (C) Comparison of relative activation in V1 between the CVI patient and the control subject for the cortical representation of each visual field quadrant (expressed as a percentage) confirms that the largest impairment in activation was in dorsal V1 (V1d) and in the right hemisphere (RH) corresponding the left inferior visual field deficit obtained on perimetry.