Literature DB >> 29867310

Sparse Estimation of Resting-State Effective Connectivity From fMRI Cross-Spectra.

Carolin Lennartz1,2, Jonathan Schiefer2,3, Stefan Rotter2,3, Jürgen Hennig1,2, Pierre LeVan1,2.   

Abstract

In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), functional connectivity is conventionally characterized by correlations between fMRI time series, which are intrinsically undirected measures of connectivity. Yet, some information about the directionality of network connections can nevertheless be extracted from the matrix of pairwise temporal correlations between all considered time series, when expressed in the frequency-domain as a cross-spectral density matrix. Using a sparsity prior, it then becomes possible to determine a unique directed network topology that best explains the observed undirected correlations, without having to rely on temporal precedence relationships that may not be valid in fMRI. Applying this method on simulated data with 100 nodes yielded excellent retrieval of the underlying directed networks under a wide variety of conditions. Importantly, the method did not depend on temporal precedence to establish directionality, thus reducing susceptibility to hemodynamic variability. The computational efficiency of the algorithm was sufficient to enable whole-brain estimations, thus circumventing the problem of missing nodes that otherwise occurs in partial-brain analyses. Applying the method to real resting-state fMRI data acquired with a high temporal resolution, the inferred networks showed good consistency with structural connectivity obtained from diffusion tractography in the same subjects. Interestingly, this agreement could also be seen when considering high-frequency rather than low-frequency connectivity (average correlation: r = 0.26 for f < 0.3 Hz, r = 0.43 for 0.3 < f < 5 Hz). Moreover, this concordance was significantly better (p < 0.05) than for networks obtained with conventional functional connectivity based on correlations (average correlation r = 0.18). The presented methodology thus appears to be well-suited for fMRI, particularly given its lack of explicit dependence on temporal lag structure, and is readily applicable to whole-brain effective connectivity estimation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  correlation; effective connectivity; fMRI; functional connectivity; resting state; structural connectivity

Year:  2018        PMID: 29867310      PMCID: PMC5951985          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  77 in total

1.  Effective connectivity of fMRI data using ancestral graph theory: dealing with missing regions.

Authors:  Lourens Waldorp; Ingrid Christoffels; Vincent van de Ven
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Multivariate autoregressive modeling of fMRI time series.

Authors:  L Harrison; W D Penny; K Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Functional MRI and multivariate autoregressive models.

Authors:  Baxter P Rogers; Santosh B Katwal; Victoria L Morgan; Christopher L Asplund; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Synchronous multiscale neuroimaging environment for critically sampled physiological analysis of brain function: hepta-scan concept.

Authors:  Vesa Korhonen; Tuija Hiltunen; Teemu Myllylä; Xindi Wang; Jussi Kantola; Juha Nikkinen; Yu-Feng Zang; Pierre LeVan; Vesa Kiviniemi
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-09-26

Review 5.  The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Giulia Preti; Thomas Aw Bolton; Dimitri Van De Ville
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Comparing dynamic causal models.

Authors:  W D Penny; K E Stephan; A Mechelli; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Tracking dynamic resting-state networks at higher frequencies using MR-encephalography.

Authors:  Hsu-Lei Lee; Benjamin Zahneisen; Thimo Hugger; Pierre LeVan; Jürgen Hennig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Comparing dynamic causal models using AIC, BIC and free energy.

Authors:  W D Penny
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome.

Authors:  Matthieu Gilson; Ruben Moreno-Bote; Adrián Ponce-Alvarez; Petra Ritter; Gustavo Deco
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Increasing fMRI sampling rate improves Granger causality estimates.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Jyrki Ahveninen; Tommi Raij; Thomas Witzel; Ying-Hua Chu; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Kevin Wen-Kai Tsai; Wen-Jui Kuo; John W Belliveau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fusion of ULS Group Constrained High- and Low-Order Sparse Functional Connectivity Networks for MCI Classification.

Authors:  Yang Li; Jingyu Liu; Ziwen Peng; Can Sheng; Minjeong Kim; Pew-Thian Yap; Chong-Yaw Wee; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2020-01

2.  ACOEC-FD: Ant Colony Optimization for Learning Brain Effective Connectivity Networks From Functional MRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Authors:  Junzhong Ji; Jinduo Liu; Aixiao Zou; Aidong Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 3.  15 Years MR-encephalography.

Authors:  Juergen Hennig; Vesa Kiviniemi; Bruno Riemenschneider; Antonia Barghoorn; Burak Akin; Fei Wang; Pierre LeVan
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.310

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.