Literature DB >> 23069810

Tracking dynamic resting-state networks at higher frequencies using MR-encephalography.

Hsu-Lei Lee1, Benjamin Zahneisen, Thimo Hugger, Pierre LeVan, Jürgen Hennig.   

Abstract

Current resting-state network analysis often looks for coherent spontaneous BOLD signal fluctuations at frequencies below 0.1 Hz in a multiple-minutes scan. However hemodynamic signal variation can occur at a faster rate, causing changes in functional connectivity at a smaller time scale. In this study we proposed to use MREG technique to increase the temporal resolution of resting-state fMRI. A three-dimensional single-shot concentric shells trajectory was used instead of conventional EPI, with a TR of 100 ms and a nominal spatial resolution of 4 × 4 × 4 mm(3). With this high sampling rate we were able to resolve frequency components up to 5 Hz, which prevents major physiological noises from aliasing with the BOLD signal of interest. We used a sliding-window method on signal components at different frequency bands, to look at the non-stationary connectivity maps over the course of each scan session. The aim of the study paradigm was to specifically observe visual and motor resting-state networks. Preliminary results have found corresponding networks at frequencies above 0.1 Hz. These networks at higher frequencies showed better stability in both spatial and temporal dimensions from the sliding-window analysis of the time series, which suggests the potential of using high temporal resolution MREG sequences to track dynamic resting-state networks at sub-minute time scale.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23069810     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  72 in total

1.  Synchronization, non-linear dynamics and low-frequency fluctuations: analogy between spontaneous brain activity and networked single-transistor chaotic oscillators.

Authors:  Ludovico Minati; Pietro Chiesa; Davide Tabarelli; Ludovico D'Incerti; Jorge Jovicich
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.642

Review 2.  Noise and non-neuronal contributions to the BOLD signal: applications to and insights from animal studies.

Authors:  Shella D Keilholz; Wen-Ju Pan; Jacob Billings; Maysam Nezafati; Sadia Shakil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Dynamic brain connectivity is a better predictor of PTSD than static connectivity.

Authors:  Changfeng Jin; Hao Jia; Pradyumna Lanka; D Rangaprakash; Lingjiang Li; Tianming Liu; Xiaoping Hu; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Nuisance Regression of High-Frequency Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data: Denoising Can Be Noisy.

Authors:  Jingyuan E Chen; Hesamoddin Jahanian; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2017-01-05

5.  Enhanced subject-specific resting-state network detection and extraction with fast fMRI.

Authors:  Burak Akin; Hsu-Lei Lee; Jürgen Hennig; Pierre LeVan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  DynamicBC: a MATLAB toolbox for dynamic brain connectome analysis.

Authors:  Wei Liao; Guo-Rong Wu; Qiang Xu; Gong-Jun Ji; Zhiqiang Zhang; Yu-Feng Zang; Guangming Lu
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-12

Review 7.  The neural basis of time-varying resting-state functional connectivity.

Authors:  Shella Dawn Keilholz
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-12

8.  Synchronous multiscale neuroimaging environment for critically sampled physiological analysis of brain function: hepta-scan concept.

Authors:  Vesa Korhonen; Tuija Hiltunen; Teemu Myllylä; Xindi Wang; Jussi Kantola; Juha Nikkinen; Yu-Feng Zang; Pierre LeVan; Vesa Kiviniemi
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-09-26

9.  BOLD fractional contribution to resting-state functional connectivity above 0.1 Hz.

Authors:  Jingyuan E Chen; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Technological advances and opportunities for applications continue to abound.

Authors:  Peter van Zijl; Linda Knutsson
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.