Literature DB >> 29867175

Prospective Observational Evaluation of Time-Dependency of Adalimumab Immunogenicity and Drug Concentrations: The POETIC Study.

Bella Ungar1,1, Tal Engel1,1, Doron Yablecovitch1,1, Adi Lahat1,1, Alon Lang1,1, Benjamin Avidan1,1, Ofir Har-Noy1,1, Dan Carter1,1, Nina Levhar1,1, Limor Selinger1,1, Sandra Neuman1,1, Ola Haj Natour1,1, Miri Yavzori1,1, Ella Fudim1,1, Orit Picard1,1, Uri Kopylov1,1, Yehuda Chowers1,1, Timna Naftali1,1, Efrat Broide1,1, Eyal Shachar1,1, Rami Eliakim1,1, Shomron Ben-Horin1,1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Adalimumab is usually self-injected at home, making prospective serial-sampling studies challenging and scarce. This has led to a gap in knowledge about evolution of anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAAs) over time and its correlation with clinical and inflammatory outcomes.
METHODS: A program for home visits by physicians at induction, every 3 months and at event of relapse, was established prospectively for Crohn's disease (CD) patients. At each visit, patients' clinical scores were determined and sera were obtained for C-reactive protein, drug, and AAA levels. This cohort was compared to a parallel prospective cohort of infliximab-treated CD patients. In a subgroup of 29 patients, trough and in-between-trough levels were compared, to elucidate the importance of timing of sampling during the injection cycle.
RESULTS: Ninety-eight CD patients starting adalimumab were prospectively followed (median follow-up 44 weeks) and 621 serum samples were analyzed. Thirty-three patients (32%) developed AAA; 18/33 (55%) of them as early as week 2, and 26/33 (79%) by week 14. Induction period AAAs were strongly associated with primary non-response (odds ratio (OR) = 5.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-17.8, p = 0.005). As compared to antibodies-to-infliximab (ATI), AAA formation rate over time was significantly lower (p = 0.01) and AAA were much more specific-85% of AAA events were associated with loss-of-response compared with 58% rate for ATI (p = 0.01). In 29 patients sampled serially during an injection cycle, levels of drug and AAA seemed comparable between four time-points during a single cycle both in patients with or without AAA (n = 8, n = 21, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: When followed prospectively and serially, AAAs are found to arise earlier than previously appreciated and their impact may be more pronounced for primary rather than secondary, non-response. Drug and AAA levels were similar both at trough and in-between injections, enabling to simplify therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29867175     DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0073-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  14 in total

1.  Appropriate Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologic Agents for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papamichael; Adam S Cheifetz; Gil Y Melmed; Peter M Irving; Niels Vande Casteele; Patricia L Kozuch; Laura E Raffals; Leonard Baidoo; Brian Bressler; Shane M Devlin; Jennifer Jones; Gilaad G Kaplan; Miles P Sparrow; Fernando S Velayos; Thomas Ullman; Corey A Siegel
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: for every patient and every drug?

Authors:  Konstantinos Papamichael; Adam S Cheifetz
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.287

3.  Proactive Adalimumab Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Data and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papamichael; Adam S Cheifetz
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 9.071

Review 4.  The Future of Precision Medicine to Predict Outcomes and Control Tissue Remodeling in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Christopher A Lamb; Aamir Saifuddin; Nick Powell; Florian Rieder
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Proactive versus Reactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Why, When, and How?

Authors:  Manar Shmais; Miguel Regueiro; Jana G Hashash
Journal:  Inflamm Intest Dis       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 6.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics During Induction to Prevent Primary Non-Response.

Authors:  Miles P Sparrow; Konstantinos Papamichael; Mark G Ward; Pauline Riviere; David Laharie; Stephane Paul; Xavier Roblin
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 9.071

7.  Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Adalimumab Is Associated With Better Long-term Outcomes Compared With Standard of Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papamichael; Anna Juncadella; Danny Wong; Shana Rakowsky; Lindsey A Sattler; James P Campbell; Byron P Vaughn; Adam S Cheifetz
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 9.071

8.  Lower adalimumab trough levels are associated with higher bowel wall thickness in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Bella Ungar; Zohar Ben-Shatach; Limor Selinger; Alona Malik; Ahmad Albshesh; Shomron Ben-Horin; Rami Eliakim; Uri Kopylov; Dan Carter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Etiology and Management of Lack or Loss of Response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Sean Fine; Kostantinos Papamichael; Adam S Cheifetz
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2019-12

10.  Associations between certolizumab pegol serum levels, anti-drug antibodies and treatment response in patients with inflammatory joint diseases: data from the NOR-DMARD study.

Authors:  Johanna Elin Gehin; Guro Løvik Goll; David John Warren; Silje Watterdal Syversen; Joseph Sexton; Eldri Kveine Strand; Tore Kristian Kvien; Nils Bolstad; Elisabeth Lie
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.