| Literature DB >> 29866608 |
Simone Dealtry1, Angela Michelato Ghizelini2, Leda C S Mendonça-Hagler2, Ricardo Moreira Chaloub3, Fernanda Reinert4, Tácio M P de Campos5, Newton C M Gomes6, Kornelia Smalla7.
Abstract
Anthropogenic activity, such as accidental oil spills, are typical sources of urban mangrove pollution that may affect mangrove bacterial communities as well as their mobile genetic elements. To evaluate remediation strategies, we followed over the time the effects of a petroleum hydrocarbon degrading consortium inoculated on mangrove tree Avicennia schaueriana against artificial petroleum contamination in a phytoremediation greenhouse experiment. Interestingly, despite plant protection due to the inoculation, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene fragments amplified from the total community DNA indicated that the different treatments did not significantly affect the bacterial community composition. However, while the bacterial community was rather stable, pronounced shifts were observed in the abundance of bacteria carrying plasmids. A PCR-Southern blot hybridization analysis indicated an increase in the abundance of IncP-9 catabolic plasmids. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of naphthalene dioxygenase (ndo) genes amplified from cDNA (RNA) indicated the dominance of a specific ndo gene in the inoculated petroleum amendment treatment. The petroleum hydrocarbon degrading consortium characterization indicated the prevalence of bacteria assigned to Pseudomonas spp., Comamonas spp. and Ochrobactrum spp. IncP-9 plasmids were detected for the first time in Comamonas sp. and Ochrobactrum spp., which is a novelty of this study.Entities:
Keywords: IncP-9 plasmids; Mangrove; Phytoremediation; ndo genes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29866608 PMCID: PMC6175736 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2018.02.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Identification of bacteria isolated from the petroleum hydrocarbon degradative consortium (PHDC), based on bacterial 16S rRNA gene partial sequence and screening for the detection of incompatibility (Inc) plasmids and naphthalene dioxygenase (ndo) genes trough dot blot hybridization.
| Days of incubation | GeneBank Accession Number | IncP-1 | IncP-9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | KX061944 | − | − | − | |
| 20 | KX061948 | − | − | − | |
| 10 | KX061938 | − | − | − | |
| 10 | KX061935 | − | + | − | |
| 5 | KX061963 | − | − | − | |
| 20 | KX061950 | + | − | − | |
| 5 | KX061962 | − | − | − | |
| 5 | KX061965 | − | − | − | |
| 5 | KX061964 | − | − | − | |
| 10 | KX061936 | + | − | + | |
| 20 | KX061947 | − | + | − | |
| 10 | KX061940 | − | + | − | |
| 10 | KX061941 | − | − | (+) | |
| 10 | KX061942 | − | + | − | |
| 20 | KX061943 | − | − | + | |
| 20 | KX061949 | − | + | − | |
| 20 | KX061954 | − | + | − | |
| 20 | KX061956 | − | − | − | |
| 20 | KX061958 | − | − | − | |
| 5 | KX061959 | − | − | + | |
| 20 | KX061960 | − | + | − | |
| 5 | KX061961 | − | + | + | |
| 10 | KX061946 | − | − | − | |
| 10 | KX061937 | − | − | − | |
| 10 | KX061968 | − | − | + | |
| 10 | KX061969 | − | + | − | |
| 5 | KX061966 | − | − | (+) | |
| 20 | KX061953 | − | − | − | |
| 10 | KX061967 | − | − | − | |
| 10 | KX061939 | − | + | − | |
| 10 | KX061945 | + | − | − | |
| 20 | KX061955 | − | − | − | |
| 20 | KX061957 | − | − | − | |
| 20 | KX061951 | − | − | − | |
| 20 | KX061952 | + | + | − | |
| − | − | − | |||
| + | − | − | |||
| − | + | − |
All sequences of identified bacterial species showed 100% of similarity with the type strains compared in the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) data base.
Negative control was represented by a randomly isolated bacterium from a soil contaminated with oil, which previously PCR-Southern blot hybridization analyzes showed the absence of IncP-1, IncP-7 and IncP-9 plasmids.
R751 (IncP-1β) was obtained from E. coli CM544 and cordially provided by the group of Sørensen SJ.
pNF 142 (IncP-9) was isolated from a creosote-contaminated soil.
(+) possible variation of the ndo detected.
Fig. 1Effects of PAH contamination on A. schaueriana mangrove tree stems and blight lesions after 21 days of contamination with crude oil. (A) controls, plants without inoculum and oil; (B) inoculated plants; (C) inoculated plants artificially contaminated with 1 mL of emulsified crude oil in 10 mL of sea water; (D) plant artificially contaminated with 1 mL of emulsified crude oil in 10 mL of sea water.
Bacterial densities and PCR-Southern blot hybridization detection of plasmid replicon-specific sequences belonging to the IncP-1, IncP-7 and IncP-9 groups.
| Sample | Description of samples | IncP-1 | IncP-7 | IncP-9 | 16S rRNA gene log10/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Treatment 1.1 Time 1 | ++ | − | − | |
| 2 | Treatment 1.2 Time 1 | ++ | − | − | |
| 3 | Treatment 1.3 Time 1 | ++ | − | + | 9.02 |
| 4 | Treatment 1.4 Time 1 | + | − | − | |
| 5 | Treatment 1.1 Time 2 | ++ | − | − | |
| 6 | Treatment 1.2 Time 2 | + | − | − | |
| 7 | Treatment 1.3 Time 2 | − | − | − | 8.79 |
| 8 | Treatment 1.4 Time 2 | ++ | − | − | |
| 9 | Treatment 2.1 Time 1 | ++ | − | ++ | |
| 10 | Treatment 2.2 Time 1 | ++ | − | + | |
| 11 | Treatment 2.3 Time 1 | − | − | ++ | 8.85 |
| 12 | Treatment 2.4 Time 1 | +++ | − | ++ | |
| 13 | Treatment 2.1 Time 2 | ++ | − | + | |
| 14 | Treatment 2.2 Time 2 | ++ | − | + | |
| 15 | Treatment 2.3 Time 2 | + | − | + | 9.07 |
| 16 | Treatment 2.4 Time 2 | + | − | − | |
| 17 | Treatment 3.1 Time 1 | +++ | − | +++ | |
| 18 | Treatment 3.2 Time 1 | ++ | − | +++ | |
| 19 | Treatment 3.3 Time 1 | ++ | − | +++ | 9.07 |
| 20 | Treatment 3. Time 1 | ++ | − | ++ | |
| 21 | Treatment 3.1 Time 2 | − | − | + | |
| 22 | Treatment 3.2 Time 2 | ++ | − | + | |
| 23 | Treatment 3.3 Time 2 | ++ | − | ++ | 9.18 |
| 24 | Treatment 3.4 Time 2 | − | − | ++ | |
| 25 | Treatment 4.1 Time 1 | + | − | − | |
| 26 | Treatment 4.2 Time 1 | − | − | + | |
| 27 | Treatment 4.3 Time 1 | ++ | − | − | 8.69 |
| 28 | Treatment 4.4 Time 1 | − | − | − | |
| 29 | Treatment 4.1 Time 2 | ++ | − | − | |
| 30 | Treatment 4.2 Time 2 | + | − | + | |
| 31 | Treatment 4.3 Time 2 | ++ | − | − | 8.9 |
| 32 | Treatment 4.4 Time 2 | + | − | + | |
| 33 | Inoculum 1 | − | − | +++ | |
| 34 | Inoculum 2 | − | − | +++ | |
| 35 | Inoculum 3 | − | − | +++ | |
| − | − | − | |||
| +++ | |||||
| +++ | |||||
| +++ |
Hybridization signal: (+++) very strong, with exposure time up to 5 min; (++) strong, with exposure time up to 1 h; (+) weak, with exposure time up to 3 h; (−) none, with exposure time of more than 3 h.
Average arithmetic of 4 replicates.
Negative control was represented by a randomly isolated bacterium from a soil contaminated with oil, which previously PCR-Southern blot hybridization analyzes showed the absence of IncP-1, IncP-7 and IncP-9 plasmids.
R751 (IncP-1β) was obtained from E. coli CM544 and cordially provided by the group of Sørensen SJ.
pCAR1 (IncP-7) was obtained from Pseudomonas resinovorans CA10 and cordially provided by the group of Izmalkova TY.
pNF 142 (IncP-9) was isolated from a creosote-contaminated soil.
Time 1 = 7 days after inoculation; Time 2 = 21 days after inoculation.
Treatment 1.1; 1.2; 1.3 and 1.4: control, plants without inoculum and oil; treatment 2.1; 2.2; 2.3 and 2.4: inoculated plants; treatment 3.1; 3.2; 3.3 and 3.4: inoculated plants artificially contaminated with 1 mL of emulsified crude oil in 10 mL of sea water; treatment 4.1; 4.2; 4.3 and 4.4: plant artificially contaminated with 1 mL of emulsified crude oil in 10 mL of sea water.
Fig. 2Comparison of the bacterial community structures by DGGE based on bacterial 16S rRNA. S: (S) Standard bacterial 16S rRNA; (1) controls, plants without inoculum and oil; (2) inoculated plants; (3) inoculated plants artificially contaminated with 1 mL of emulsified crude oil in 10 mL of sea water; (4) plant artificially contaminated with 1 mL of emulsified crude oil in 10 mL of sea water.
Fig. 3Comparison of DNA and RNA (cDNA) DGGE ndo fingerprints of the mangrove microcosms artificially contaminated with petroleum at 7 (A) and 21 (B) days after contamination. Microcosms with and without inoculation are shown. Arrow indicates the ndo gene type introduced by inoculation.