| Literature DB >> 29865153 |
Edson Rodrigues Vieira1, Mariana Ingrid Dutra da Silva Xisto2, Milagre Américo Pele3, Daniela Sales Alviano4, Celuta Sales Alviano5, Eliana Barreto-Bergter6, Galba Maria de Campos-Takaki7.
Abstract
Monohexosylceramides (CMHs) are highly conserved fungal glycosphingolipids playing a role in several cellular processes such as growth, differentiation and morphological transition. In this study, we report the isolation, purification and chemical characterization of CMHs from Rhizopus stolonifer and R. microspores. Using positive ion mode ESI-MS, two major ion species were observed at m/z 750 and m/z 766, respectively. Both ion species consisted of a glucose/galactose residue attached to a ceramide moiety containing 9-methyl-4,8-sphingadienine with an amidic linkage to a hydroxylated C16:0 fatty acid. The antimicrobial activity of CMH was evaluated against Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria using the agar diffusion assay. CMH from both Rhizopus species inhibited the growth of Bacillus terrae, Micrococcus luteus (M. luteus) and Pseudomonas stutzeri (P. stutzeri) with a MIC50 of 6.25, 6.25 and 3.13 mg/mL, respectively. The bactericidal effect was detected only for M. luteus and P. stutzeri, with MBC values of 25 and 6.25 mg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, the action of CMH on the biofilm produced by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was analyzed using 12.5 and 25 mg/mL of CMH from R. microsporus. Total biofilm biomass, biofilm matrix and viability of the cells that form the biofilm structure were evaluated. CMH from R. microsporus was able to inhibit the MRSA biofilm formation in all parameters tested.Entities:
Keywords: Rhizopus; antibacterial activities; biofilm; monohexosylceramides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29865153 PMCID: PMC6100016 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23061331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(A) Isolation and purification of glycosphingolipids from Rhizopus species. (B) High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) of neutral glycosphingolipid fractions by silica gel column chromatography. P. CMH standard. Lane 1: Methanol fraction from R. stolonifer grown in potato dextrose broth (PDB). Lane 2: Methanol fraction from R. stolonifer grown in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose growth medium (YEPD). Lane 3: Methanol fraction from R. microsporus grown in PDB. Lane 4: Methanol fraction from R. microspores grown in YEPD. Solvent system: Chloroform/methanol/2 M NH4OH (40:10:1 v/v/v). Detection: iodine vapor and orcinol-sulfuric acid reagent.
Figure 2ESI-MS [M + Li] analysis of GlcCer/GalCer from Rhizopus species. (A) CMH from R. microsporus grown in PDB and YEPD, and CMH from R. stolonifer grown in YEPD. Major ions species at m/z 750. (B) CMH from R. stolonifer grown in PDB. Major ions species at m/z 766.
Antimicrobial Activity of CMHs from Rhizopus species by Agar Diffusion Assay. Lipid samples (Folch lower layer and CMH) from R. stolonifer and R. microsporus grown in PDB were dissolved in chloroform/methanol (2:1 v/v) at a concentration of 50 mg/mL (10 µL). The negative control consisted of 10 µL of chloroform/methanol (2:1 v/v).
| Bacteria Species | Inhibition (+) or No Inhibition (−) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Folch Lower Layer | CMH | ||
|
|
| − | − | − |
|
| − | ± | + | |
|
| − | − | − | |
|
| − | ± | + | |
|
| − | − | − | |
| − | − | − | ||
|
| − | + | + | |
|
|
| − | − | − |
|
| − | + | ± | |
|
| − | − | − | |
|
| − | ± | ± | |
|
| − | − | − | |
| − | − | − | ||
|
| − | + | + | |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) values from CMH of R. stolonifer and R. microsporus grown in PDB media. MIC values from Streptomycin/Penicillin as a drug control.
| CMH Fraction | Bacteria | MIC50 | MBC |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 6.25 mg/mL | >50 mg/mL |
|
| 6.25 mg/mL | 25 mg/mL | |
|
| 3.13 mg/mL | 6.25 mg/mL | |
|
|
| 3.13 mg/mL | >50 mg/mL |
|
| 6.25 mg/mL | 25 mg/mL | |
|
| 3.12 mg/mL | 6.25 mg/mL | |
| Streptomycin/Penicillin |
| 0.004 mg/mL | - |
|
| 0.004 mg/mL | - | |
|
| 0.004 mg/mL | - |
MIC50 Minimal Inhibitory Concentration; MBC Minimal Bactericidal Concentration.
Figure 3Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of CMHs from Rhizopus species against B. terrea, M. luteus and P. stutzeri analyzed by dot spot technique.
Figure 4Effect of CMH on MRSA-S. aureus biofilm formation. (A) Representative biofilm formation at different concentration of CMH (12.5 and 25 mg/mL) and control. (B) Quantification of total biofilm formed in presence or absence of CMH. Absorbance determined at 600 nm. (C) CMH effect on MRSA biofilm formation determined by absorbance measurement at 600 nm. Mean, standard deviation and standard error are represented. Statistical differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.0001) are represented by asterisks (ns = not significant).
Figure 5Effect of CMH on MRSA-S. aureus biofilm formation, after 24 h of growth. (A) Total biomass of the biofilm was quantified by crystal violet assay. (B) The biofilm matrix was quantified by safranin assay. (C) Metabolic activity of the cells inside the biofilm was detected by XTT-reduction assay. Statistical differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.0001) are represented by asterisks (ns = not significant) ((A) = absorbance). Control represent MRSA growth in absence of CMH. Values represent the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.